It's not a one card draw, Alan. So 9/47 is not relevant. You have to look at two card draw percentages.
Holding 33 you have a 28.3% chance of hitting a winner.
Holding AQJ you have a 37% chance
Holding J you have a 31.4% chance
Holding QJ you have a 37.6% chance
The winner is QJ if you are looking for the best chance of hitting a winning hand.
PS. I used winpoker and calculated the % for nada and then subtracted that from 100.
Last edited by arcimede$; 05-18-2012 at 09:45 AM.
Arc, take a look at this:
http://www.videopoker.com/learn/statistics/
You say QJ. Others say hold the pair of 3s. This should be interesting.
Arc you wrote: "It's not a one card draw, Alan. So 9/47 is not relevant."
I didn't say it was a one card draw. I said: "Now, holding AQJ you have 9 cards that would give you a winning pair. That's 9/47 remaining cards"
Where did I say it was a one card draw? After the initial deal there are 47 cards remaining. 9 of the remaining 47 cards would help you make a high pair. That's 9/47. Isn't it?
Hi Alan!
I agree here.
Highest win prob is to hold the QJ.
using the calculator(hope the link works) 3C,3S,QC,AD,JH
and Excel
SallyCode:win prob ways Held Draws EV Total 0.376441566 6104 _ _ QC _ JH 0.5 16215 0.370027752 400 _ _ QC AD JH 0.4561 1081 0.368547641 5976 _ _ _ AD JH 0.4684 16215 0.368547641 5976 _ _ QC AD _ 0.4684 16215 0.314136742 56031 _ _ _ _ JH 0.4643 178365 0.31178202 55611 _ _ QC _ _ 0.4527 178365 0.311277437 55521 _ _ _ AD _ 0.4523 178365 0.287141536 4656 3C 3S _ _ _ 0.8237 16215 0.259019426 280 3C 3S _ _ JH 0.6753 1081 0.259019426 280 3C 3S _ AD _ 0.6753 1081 0.259019426 280 3C 3S QC _ _ 0.6753 1081 0.250693802 271 _ 3S _ AD JH 0.2831 1081 0.250693802 271 _ 3S QC _ JH 0.2831 1081 0.250693802 271 _ 3S QC AD _ 0.2831 1081 0.250693802 271 3C _ _ AD JH 0.2831 1081 0.250693802 271 3C _ QC _ JH 0.2831 1081 0.250693802 271 3C _ QC AD _ 0.2831 1081 0.234227567 3798 3C _ QC _ _ 0.3505 16215 0.227998767 3697 _ 3S _ AD _ 0.3052 16215 0.227998767 3697 3C _ _ AD _ 0.3052 16215 0.224051804 3633 _ 3S _ _ JH 0.2894 16215 0.224051804 3633 _ 3S QC _ _ 0.2894 16215 0.224051804 3633 3C _ _ _ JH 0.2894 16215 0.191489362 9 _ 3S QC AD JH 0.1915 47 0.191489362 9 3C _ QC AD JH 0.1915 47 0.179981733 276081 _ _ _ _ _ 0.3128 1533939 0.170212766 8 3C 3S _ AD JH 0.383 47 0.170212766 8 3C 3S QC _ JH 0.383 47 0.170212766 8 3C 3S QC AD _ 0.383 47 0.127014829 22655 _ 3S _ _ _ 0.2285 178365 0.12608976 22490 3C _ _ _ _ 0.223 178365 0 0 3C 3S QC AD JH 0 1
I'm just starting out in VP
Only played a few times. I like talking with the seniors while playing. They all have great stories!
Last edited by mustangsally; 05-26-2012 at 06:12 PM. Reason: word wrap ruined my data table
Thanks for joining us Mustagsalley!
Well, we got the range of answers that I expected, and yes I tried to stir the pot. What I am looking for now is a discussion about a strategy to win (holding QJ for example) vs optimal strategy which says to hold the pair of 3s.
Alan, Video Poker strategy has been studied by many very educated individuals. There's nothing real complex going on from a mathematical standpoint. Maybe you should listen to the experts instead of the silly nonsense that you have been blindly accepting.
What is the point of your comment? So, let me state it again:
"Proper strategy" says to hold the pair of threes. In our problem, where the wife says get me five dollars, the correct strategy is to hold JQ. Now, there comes a time when you have to step back and say "sometimes just getting my money back might be better." When? For example, you are playing for comps, or to reach another play level such as on multi strike, or when trying to turn free play into cash.
The question is, "What would the casino prefer you do?" In almost all cases, the casino prefers you do whatever provides the lowest return, regardless of number of hands. So simply don't do what the casino wants you to do.
There is no wife telling you to make five dollars. There is no Rob Singer telling you to reach a win goal. There is only you and the video poker and the casino. So why not do the thing that gives you the best return?
I like your thinking redietz, but what is the best return? Holding 3-3 is not a paying hand, and holding QJ is more likely to at least give you your five dollars back.
Almost every book agrees that the J is the best draw because it can fit in the most hands-and I NEVER like leaving out the possibility of a Royal.
Alan, no one is arguing against your statement. IF, got that, IF your goal is to try and win a single hand then holding the QJ is the proper play. The problem is if you try to take that strategy and apply it to different goals as in "a discussion about a strategy to win (holding QJ for example) vs optimal strategy ". (Notice you said nothing about goals here.)
You simply can't take the strategy outside the goals that are stated and still expect it to be valid.
The best return over time is to hold the 3-3. In fact, it's a rather big difference in most games. Once again, you will hit more winners holding QJ than any other hold. However, those winners on average will be considerably less valuable. One probably only needs to play a few hundred hands to see the benefit of holding the 3-3.
Here's an analogy. You go to a market where they are selling oranges for .50 or 3 for a dollar. Obviously, buying one orange at .50 will be less expensive than buying 3 which would cost twice as much. Does that mean you should run to the market every day and buy one orange? Figure it out. It's exactly the same kind of math.
Last edited by arcimede$; 05-27-2012 at 06:26 AM.
The only one I kept is "Win at Video Poker" by Roger Fleming. In the back is the section on best one card draw for when the Royal hits astronomical proportions on a progressive. It also states the J is the best card to hold in any situation-if you only had one shot.
Unique situation, but very educational nonetheless.
What does this claim tell you? It should tell you that IF your goal is to hit a RF the best one card hold is a single Jack. And note, it's not because it gives you a better chance at the RF. That is the same with any single royal card. It's because the average return of all the other possible draws is higher. That is expert play logic.
It all gets back to your goal. Now, for most people (who never see an "astronomical" progressive) their goal is to win the most money possible. When that is the goal the best approach to playing VP is expert play strategy. That is what the math tells you.
Last edited by arcimede$; 05-27-2012 at 09:53 AM.
Three days ago, I was playing ddbp and the machine was tug and go, and I received two high cards with matching suited LOW cards-as has happened several times in the past few months. Once again, I swept the hand and received 4 3's for $100. One and two card draws and sweeps have been great to me in the past couple of months. Last time, it was 4 A's. This is where I go with Rob-the heck with what the math says you should do. I DID NOT say ignore it, BTW.
Interesting about the jack. The last royal I hit before my 170,000 hand drought was when I held just a jack. The drought was broken when I held three to the royal. But Ive also had a royal holding just an ace, and then twice I was dealt a royal and once I drew all five cards for a royal after holding no cards.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)