Originally Posted by
kewlJ
Originally Posted by
redietz
I sent an email to Gambling with an Edge, linking this thread and giving a brief summary of the claims. I stressed that I would not have bothered except that mickey crimm, who is a Gambling with an Edge guest, said that he believed the jackpots were won by Rob Argentino.
GWAE doesn't want to get involved with this kind of forum drama/trolling situations. I have requested they interview Mdog, because I knew they would ask the right questions, but they just don't want to be part of this kind of crap.
Mickey saying what ever he says now is irrelevant. Just go back and read everything he said 6, 8, 9 years ago, when he was being truthful and leading the charge against Singer and this exact bullcrap. It is quite clear to everyone that mickey too, now enjoys these troll games. It doesn't effect his credibilty as a real and successful AP, but you have to seperate out that on forums, he likes the troll stuff and has now injected himself directly into this crap.
Well, since Dancer and GWAE are the video poker experts, I feel like I did my due diligence. So until and unless they respond, I won't bother with this any more, as it seems ridiculous, really.
I own some site names. I could get one or two rolling and stick a forum on them. I've always intended to do that (I held onto some of these for years), but never really had the time to write chunks of copy to get one started. Plus once you start up a forum, you are at the behest of the server to make sure there is no scamming or child porn or ultra-foul language and all that, or they can toss you off. I actually started writing some copy a few weeks back for "anchor articles" for a site. I'm not sure how I'd handle a forum, however. On one hand, I think if you don't provide your real name to the forum host, regardless of whether you post under a handle, then the forum owner lacks control. I'm really not into people playing at being expert who aren't expert, or people whose posts are 50% wise ass comments relating to nothing about gambling or Socratic crap that contributes nothing except making people re-edit their original posts five times so they don't make minor mistakes.
Obviously, I don't want to make any money. The site would be non-monetized. But I would like to provide some semi-serious meeting place for multi-interest gamblers who have some experience or expertise. I'd have zero patience with things like the MaxPen/mickey exchanges or Alan pretending he doesn't know rules of journalism. Those are two different kinds of trolling, but they are still trolling, I think. I don't even know what trolling is, honestly. The MaxPen/mickey stuff is a waste of broadband. Alan pretending he thinks one thing when he knows something else is just lying that's beneath his history. So I guess rather than labeling this stuff trolling, I'd label what's wrong with it specifically. I have no issues being the expert who makes the calls on content, since I am an expert who should make the calls on content. I'm not some anonymous pretend cowboy. But my actual expert gambling knowledge is narrow, so I'm going to sound like Genghis Khan when I shut people down regarding topics I know very little about. Like would I debate MDawg regarding baccarat? No, I'd just shut down nonsensical claims that defy math.
I listened to a podcast last night previewing the authors' book, Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World. I really liked what they had to say about using a "black box" flow chart to evaluate claims when you aren't expert in the math of the claims. It makes sense to me and is very practical. They are doing a rebroadcast tonight at skepticalinquirer.org. If you get a chance, listen to the podcast and tell me what you think.