Thanks for posting this and taking the time to explain it. Much appreciated. I guess this explains why there was an "NDA" signed by Fraud Singer and the "casino." Just a way to fend off anyone asking who, when, or where. And it's why Rob.Singer got upset when I suggested that the simple evidence which could bypass fake photos and fake W2Gs was to name the casino personnel who verified the win. He scrambled away from that idea.
I just don't get why anyone would do such a thing. Mental issues, I guess.
Hear, hear! Mickey is not alone. There are a number of people "blinded by their hate of me", as you will see PV, if you haven't already. Welcome to the forum.
BTW, PV, just wait until you see Singer's response to you and your post. Get ready for every name in the book.
Great seeing PV here. Regardless of the petty shit here, he is one of the good guys. I encourage all of you to check out the Chrissy Mitchell thread on Dan’s poker forum. These guys are vicious and beat the guy into the ground. It’s a long read but not people to fuck with you if are a scammer.
I only wish Dan got involved here as he does over there.
Thanks for the welcome guys. I'm used to dealing with frauds and scammers, I can handle the name calling.
If you love the human race then it’s ok and necessary to have some
Hate towards people who want to contribute to the extinction of mankind.
We are living in a time that has the most humans in existence while at the same time glorifying and protecting groups that are the biggest contributing factor to population decline.
But whatever we can say it’s science instead of porn exposure
I am going to disagree and opine that Rob.Singer isn't going to go head-to-head with anyone for awhile. It's embarrassing, maybe not quite as embarrassing as the Newell, but pretty bad. Frankly, considering the starting point for Rob.Singer's reputation prior to the latest escapade, he hasn't fallen that far.
PV, I have an unusual request for you. Rob.Singer claimed that people working for me tried to "sell him picks." Meanwhile, Alan Mendelson made some semi-snarky comments about people knowing I don't solicit. I guess Alan was surprised my forum inbox was full, which is what happens when you don't know or care enough to sort things after 10 years. So, if in your debunking travels, you come across any comments regarding the reputation of one Bob Dietz or Bob Dietz's Integrity Sports, please post them here. Mickey, for example, referred to me as a fake or fraud or something recently. If you run into anyone with an opinion vis-a-vis my reputation or anyone who's been solicited by me via email or PM or text or anything, really, please post here and let people know what a scumbag I am. Thanks.
Oh yeah, to get you up to speed, I don't PM, email, or call anyone regarding handicapping and never have. And nobody is working for me. Anyway, carry on.
Redietz: I will keep my eyes open regarding comments about your reputation. Honestly, I think people here trust you and know you didn't solicit randoms regarding picks. As usual, just trying to get under your skin.
Rob, In all honesty I truly would be happy for you if you did Win a large jackpot. I'm not a "hater". Honestly, I think most people here would be happy for you if you won a huge jackpot, even after all the fraudulent stories you have saturated the forums with over two plus decades. I wish I could come to the conclusion that you did in fact win, but the evidence screams to the contrary.
I will post more in a couple hours regarding Singer's fraudulent $1.5 million jackpot...
Last edited by PositiveVariance; 06-07-2022 at 05:26 PM.
Can you address the blue bar with the hyphen at the top? I assumed it was a laptop but I'm curious as to what that is if it's a machine in someone's basement.
Yes, I will explain the blue bar as well.
Rob might have a bad case of smallcox.Originally Posted by redietz
What, Me Worry?
In this post I will go over the picture that Rob posted guns/Money ect. I wanted to go over the video poker picture but it’s going to take some time to type it up. So I will go over the money picture now and do the video poker fraud tomorrow. Sorry, I know you may have been eager to see it.
Anyone that has seen stacks of hundred dollar bills (which most or all of us here have)
knew instantly that the 3 stacks of hundreds (30k) was fake. Well, I take that back... It all wasn’t fake. The single 100 dollar bill on top was real. So appropriately 299 fake China bills, with one real bill.
This is something scammers love to do. They must think people are color blind. If you look at the first picture, you can see a clear difference between the color of the top bill vs. all the others. Compare this with the second picture of real money.
In the third picture you can see the 2 circled areas on the corners of 2 bills. There are 2 main differences to notice:
1. The details on the real hundred vs. virtually no details on the fake hundred. Fake hundred almost looks like a blob of ink. No quality or details on fake bill.
2. The color contrast of real bill vs. fake is night and day.
Now take a look at the forth picture. This one I love!
Take a look at the circled area on the fake cash. There are 2 small stragglers hanging off the bills. Do you know what that is? The stacks of fake money are being cut with inferior cutting equipment and/or the paper is being slightly moved when cut. You know the cutters they have for you to use at Office Depot? Or the ones you used in kindergarten to cut stacks of construction paper? Well that’s what they are using in this sweatshop that is cutting these stacks of fake notes that eventually ended up in Singers safe. Real currency wouldn’t produce tho’s stragglers hanging off the bills, and if they did they would be pulled off during quality control inspections. Also, if you look close you can see cut marks down the stacks. New stacks of real money this is not visible.
I know most of you knew the cash was fake, but hopefully if you didn’t you do now.
Rob, if you spend a little more money, you can actually buy “aged” looking currency. Looks excellent compared to the construction paper stacks that you tried to pass off.
I really need to think of a new word besides “scammer” as I usually describe people that try to take money from others. I don’t think money is Rob’s motive, not really sure what his motive is? Impress internet strangers?
Last edited by PositiveVariance; 06-07-2022 at 08:48 PM.
This is great. It's like listening to Perry Mason (I love Perry Mason).
I always argue this when it comes to motivations. We live in a hyper-capitalist culture, so people seem flummoxed when there's not some direct financial gain involved. But cultural anthropologists recognize that resources in a culture can be material or non-material. Non-material resources are things like reputation, prestige, status, respect. Non-material resources, one can argue, have every bit the utility of material resources. They're not always easy to quantify, but they can be measured. So when "scammers" acquire non-material resources through their scams, they may not be breaking whatever laws apply in a particular culture in a particular jurisdiction at a particular time, but they undeniably gain leverage and power. They're breaking social mores if they're not breaking legal laws, and the word "scam" is appropriate. Someone who offers quack cancer cures for no cost is scamming. Someone who gets laid by claiming to have a job they don't is scamming. Somebody who acquires social media followers by creating a reputation that's smoke and mirrors is scamming. Money doesn't change hands, but it's still scamming.
There are currently 1683 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1683 guests)