Sometimes 2 enemies will team up to fight a 3rd enemy. You guys just keep falling for it. Its pathetic.
Sometimes 2 enemies will team up to fight a 3rd enemy. You guys just keep falling for it. Its pathetic.
This is what makes you part of the problem. You're giving a trolling narcissist the attention he craves. You've said you were going to ignore him more than once, but you just can't quit him. That's your problem not his. He only posts to get the reactions. You're feeding that behavior. I'm sorry you don't get it. The other bullshit here is simply an ongoing hate fest. But hey. If you want to spend your life fighting windmills then you've fallen for The Perfect Storm, Don Quixote.Originally Posted by kewlJ
Hey, it's not as if this place is a font of wisdom without Singer.
Sure he's a troll, and a narcissist: that is a given, a fact that all regular posters understand.
We CHOOSE to respond to him, to dispute his ridiculous claims.
Why?
Because we can?
Just a bunch of bored guys filling up the time between trips to the casino and the toilet.
Last edited by MisterV; 06-02-2022 at 10:40 AM.
What, Me Worry?
I would agree with this but when I started fucking with him he got all wound up and twisted - kewl style.Originally Posted by unowmeRob is an Internet Troll. He's a narcissist. He's been doing this for two decades. He gets pleasure by taunting you guys and getting you all riled up....some to the point of hatred, futile bets and agreeing to meetings to one up him.
In his 10,000 posts here has he ever said anything of value? Some here seem to have made it a life's work to debunk every Singer post. That's as pathetic as Rob's trolling. Others look for a shred of plausibility in anything he says and claim "It's not impossible"
I'm not sure whether this is funny or sad, but if you just take a step back you'll see he's manipulating you to respond to him. There is some real psychology going on here. You haven't won anything. You haven't one upped him. You never have. You've given him exactly what he wants. Attention. And you've done it for years. You're co-dependents.
I had to tell him I was joking to get him to calm his tallywacker.
Yes there was real psychology going on but it told me that YES Singer takes his persona seriously.
So that throws your theory in question but you've known of him for far longer than me and seem sharp. so whatever.
It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"
These people are so stupid they take pride in learning to dance to my every command. All it took was to hit a few very large VP jackpots, and it was easy pickins' from there. The skillful use of my scalpel was and has been the defining touch.
But let's get back to the Itemization protocol. Max has not only faltered and stumbled thru his a-humma a-humma a-humma constantly changing story about how his "Caesars proof" is the evidence everyone who hates Singer needs to "put that liar in his place"...but mickey excoriated max's lying so articulately that it even brought kew to his knees (and if you're thinking it was for THAT reason, study the meaning of "disappointing").
Of course we have kew basically IMPLORING one and all to pretend my jackpot is fake. But after his strategy of "hey guys Singer has found a SECRET VP JACKPOT WEBSITE" that provides him these pictures!" went down the tubes because none of the anti-Singer sleuths here or anywhere else have been able to find a dealt four 3's with a 2, $1.5million jackpot on $25 ten-play UX. And OH MY GOD....isn't that absolutely INFURIATING for these losers to have to admit!?
Dan finally chimed in, only it only had to do with cleaning this thread up. But let's see what kew's big hopes are: first, he falsely claimed that Dan "debunked past Singer jackpot photos". But after a fact check --which no one here would ever do but me--its found that, while it's well known Dan is hardly a fan of mine, when he claimed my $100,000 win from the Wynn was a Photoshop job of some sort (which is way beyond my abilities) Alan eliminated that claim with a picture via a simple visit to the machine I hit it on. His other claim was that my RV Trader ad was a "fake ad". All it took to debunk that was a few calls or emails to RV Trader asking if proof of ownership is required from an ad placed from the state I placed it from, and if it's always required on an ad for half a million dollars sale. Yes, while I believe that Dan doesn't care much for me and would prefer my jackpot is somehow fake, he's also astute enough to know that, absent ANY evidence to the contrary, it doesn't do any good to lie about it. Most here very likely believe by now that, I hit this win, my son took two not great but adequate pictures, the jackpot existed NOWHERE ELSE prior to my posting it as mine, and every single attempt at proving it wasn't mine is nothing but blowing smoke.
Hit in a foreign country? You're getting THAT desperate max? What's next---he hit it on redietz' planet, Mars?
But just like when kew and max chose to hide instead of getting their weak hearts broken by viewing the Newell in Az., and just how everyone would rather obfuscate my visit into Caesars earlier this week where I completely and utterly demolished max's foolish claim about "knowing" they had picture proof that the jackpot I hit was instead hit there earlier....these cowards have shown again that they would rather live a lie that be destroyed by the truth.
There WILL be a corroborating W2G posted. When? Hahaha! I'm gonna let it fester with you fools for a while, and when I think that the P-A-I-N level is starting to subside, I'll make it surface once again in all it's agonizing glory. You see, just because a loser like kew wants everyone to believe it's "100% sure that Singer never hit this thing" and that he's right "because he says so" I'm gonna make it hurt as much and as slowly as possible. Sort of like waterboarding them!
BTW---the one time I posted a W2G only the haters claimed it was "fake!". No evidence given of course, only "it has to be fake because I said so". That'll happen here on this one doubtlessly. But OH the hurt it'll cause....
THE PERFECT STORM
Last edited by Rob.Singer; 06-02-2022 at 06:14 PM.
Here's what is needed: enuf with the arguing about SP. It wasn't a good idea anyway. It's obvious max would NEVER have shown his face--even if he was there--once I walked in with my son. Max has proven not to be the sharpest tool in the shed, but he's not butt-stoopid like kew either. And just happily handing over his phantom bag of money is something he'd never ever do.
I achieved my main goal anyway. The utter destruction of his foolish Caesars story was worth it's weight in platinum. Expecting the same to have any chance at happening--especially kew, when max never confirmed the meet after I added in that I'm bringing my son and the $100k bet--was not at all needed. He already suffered defeat, and he made it worse by trying to babble a new set of tunes afterwards.
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerThese people are so stupid they take pride in learning to dance to my every command. All it took was to hit a few very large VP jackpots, and it was easy pickins' from there. The skillful use of my scalpel was and has been the defining touch.
But let's get back to the Itemization protocol. Max has not only faltered and stumbled thru his a-humma a-humma a-humma constantly changing story about how his "Caesars proof" is the evidence everyone who hates Singer needs to "put that liar in his place"...but mickey excoriated max's lying so articulately that it even brought kew to his knees (and if you're thinking it was for THAT reason, study the meaning of "disappointing").
Of course we have kew basically IMPLORING one and all to pretend my jackpot is fake. But after his strategy of "hey guys Singer has found a SECRET VP JACKPOT WEBSITE" that provides him these pictures!" went down the tubes because none of the anti-Singer sleuths here or anywhere else have been able to find a dealt four 3's with a 2, $1.5million jackpot on $25 ten-play UX. And OH MY GOD....isn't that absolutely INFURIATING for these losers to have to admit!?
Dan finally chimed in, only it only had to do with cleaning this thread up. But let's see what kew's big hopes are: first, he falsely claimed that Dan "debunked past Singer jackpot photos". But after a fact check --which no one here would ever do but me--its found that, while it's well known Dan is hardly a fan of mine, when he claimed my $100,000 win from the Wynn was a Photoshop job of some sort (which is way beyond my abilities) Alan eliminated that claim with a picture via a simple visit to the machine I hit it on. His other claim was that my RV Trader ad was a "fake ad". All it took to debunk that was a few calls or emails to RV Trader asking if proof of ownership is required from an ad placed from the state I placed it from, and if it's always required on an ad for half a million dollars sale. Yes, while I believe that Dan doesn't care much for me and would prefer my jackpot is somehow fake, he's also astute enough to know that, absent ANY evidence to the contrary, it doesn't do any good to lie about it. Most here very likely believe by now that, I hit this win, my son took two not great but adequate pictures, the jackpot existed NOWHERE ELSE prior to my posting it as mine, and every single attempt at proving it wasn't mine is nothing but blowing smoke.
Hit in a foreign country? You're getting THAT desperate max? What's next---he hit it on redietz' planet, Mars?
But just like when kew and max chose to hide instead of getting their weak hearts broken by viewing the Newell in Az., and just how everyone would rather obfuscate my visit into Caesars earlier this week where I completely and utterly demolished max's foolish claim about "knowing" they had picture proof that the jackpot I hit was instead hit there earlier....these cowards have shown again that they would rather live a lie that be destroyed by the truth.
There WILL be a corroborating W2G posted. When? Hahaha! I'm gonna let it fester with you fools for a while, and when I think that the P-A-I-N level is starting to subside, I'll make it surface once again in all it's agonizing glory. You see, just because a loser like kew wants everyone to believe it's "100% sure that Singer never hit this thing" and that he's right "because he says so" I'm gonna make it hurt as much and as slowly as possible. Sort of like waterboarding them!
BTW---the one time I posted a W2G only the haters claimed it was "fake!". No evidence given of course, only "it has to be fake because I said so". That'll happen here on this one doubtlessly. But OH the hurt it'll cause....
THE PERFECT STORM
Your schtick is wore out.
Let's get the money in escrow. I say it's not your jackpot. Simple.
Take my money.
If you could you would. It really is that simple.
At this point you don't need any more back and forth. What you need is an intervention.
You're ill. I will not be entertaining your delusions anymore.
FraudJ's word is worth less than the prop cash in Singer's safe...RIP
Post #227 is pretty definitive. Hard to wriggle away from it. Free money.
I'm sure coach and mickey will be lining up for the free money, too. No reason to pass it up, after all.
Should be fun. I'll hire a videographer and narrate. Coach and mickey have no problems being on video, I take it.
Last edited by redietz; 06-02-2022 at 08:45 PM.
Ditz, how will maxiepad prove it's not Rob's jackpot? Is he going to offer up all of the imaginary scenarios dreamed up by himself and the other Brokeback Boys, YOU and KJ, as evidence. Then proclaim victory?Originally Posted by redietz
So far, the only person with a pic of the jackpot is ROB SINGER? All you have to do is debunk it. But you can't. At least you haven't so far. It's a pic of a 1.5 million dollar jackpot for Christ's sake. You can't trace that down? WTF?
You've been given some names of Caesar's employee's by Singer, a slot person named "Mahina," another slot person named Rick Simon/Simeon, and a high limit slot operations manager named Kenda High. Why are you three hiding from them?
All three of you are to chickenshit to even make a phone call over there much less show up in person. Could it be you don't want to hear what you think you will hear?
But I will say this. maxiepad is deceptive. He may have gone over to Caesar's but didn't like what he heard so is keeping it under wraps.
KJ is plain out to afraid of his own shadow to show up anywhere.
And you live in a shack in Tennessee with your toothless girlfriend.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Post #227 seems pretty definitive. Hard to wriggle away from that one. Money in verifiable escrow. Wager is Singer must provide definitive proof of the jackpot. That would have to be defined. I'd think casino employees identifying and verifying the jackpot winner, along with the W2G, would work.
Free money? Who doesn't want free money?
I'll pay for the videographer. And do the narration. Very exciting. I'll work on my radio voice. Maybe my filmmaker friend, Dennison, could do the narration instead. He has a better radio voice. I have a semi-Philly accent.
Who doesn't want free money?
So much entertainment value from just a couple jealous people! And SO many pages.
Allow me to simplify things for everyone.
Item no. 1: A few weeks ago I asked for help finding $25 five-play UX for my final video poker exercise. Reason: I now feel uncomfortable playing such a game at my ridiculous age, so I wanted to risk quite a bit to possibly go out with a final meaningful win.
Item no. 2: max presented the idea of negotiating with hi-limit rooms with a commitment because it was doubtful that game was available anywhere. So I researched and/or called every Hi-limit slots room across Nevada that exists, and as expected, the game did not exist. So shortly afterwards, I asked my son to accompany me on the short trip as I hit the HL rooms in LV. His job was to carry the bag of cash. The first room I went to accepted, and the rest is history.
Item no. 3: Surprising deals can appear at any time. I just had one of those on a $5 machine recently. Denomination doesn't matter and paytable doesn't matter. They happen. And this wasn't me---claiming to "beat the math" or "use special plays" or whatever. This was me receiving a Pure Luck Deal--apparently when all (or at least most of) the stars were aligned. And that's all it is. If it were anyone other than me, congrats would have been given for the stunning win and no one would be forcing themselves to make believe it wasn't real.
Item no. 4: No one here has experienced the extraordinary chaos a hit like this creates, even in the middle of the night. People show up, the machine gets opened up and is checked, re-checked, and checked again. Video I'm sure gets reviewed. I had to review the correct amount of the taxable wins log, choose how I wanted to be paid, sign paperwork etc., so I asked my son to take a couple pics for his mom. And believe this: the LAST thing on my mind was thinking about what posting it was gonna create. It just isn't important at that point in time.
Item no. 5: When I got home I actually thought about NOT posting it. All it would do is be one more reason to be hated, the squad would jump thru hoops to try and discredit it, and there would be non-stop insults and arguments. And as time passed with no evidence to the contrary being possible, as I of course already knew, the pages of hate grew. And as everyone should know, the best way to separate yourself from the noise is to simply stay away and the feeling will quickly pass. That's where I am now--a brief read of a few posts for flavor, while I toss in a few of the refining ingredients.
Item no. 6: Ignore my latest trip to Caesars and SP. The only part of it that was helpful was the CP part, and all that did was cause even more insults. Alternatively, just think: this was the largest VP jackpot of all time. The squad wants to believe it existed prior and that I "stole it from somewhere else". OK it's their right to want to believe that. But while I've completely debunked the Caesars theory, if this exact win existed before, why can nobody else find it.... especially after a computer-clunker like myself supposedly found it? Does that make any sense? And afterwards, it's certainly a casino's right to ask that this event not be publicized to their embarrassment and it is my choice to abide by their wishes or not. And my choice is not to identify where I hit this unless and until they do, if that ever happens.
Item no. 7: I took the unusual step of giving the person I worked with to set this play up (as well as it was this same person who told me the game was also available in ten-play) a two-stack tip. This wasn't me just handing out money in a state of euphoria. I was "paying" someone for their work in making this moment possible. It was the right thing to do.
Item no. 8: I already know the tax form won't give any of the squad a warm and fuzzy because they won't let it. Redietz has already chimed in with some weird scenario where I call the people in who were at the original scene and repeat their performances from that morning. Naturally that's not happening. But I've got the form right here....can't you hear it crackling as I run it thru my fingers?
THE PERFECT STORM
It is clear you're a loser who can't put up evidence of anything. <snicker>Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
I talk to a few sharp people from this forum and they universally quit reading these pages of nonsensical repetitive text. It works with Kewl and that gives your life meaning but honestly bro lots of others don't even pay any attention to you. Maybe you should take a nap or find a different forum where people aren't familiar with your rep. Stick with Kewl?
It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"
....HOOK, LINE AND SINKER!!!!!!!!
For this to be a valid theory I think we'd need to measure the lengths of the posts made in these threads. Im fairly certain Rob has put far more effort into this shit.Originally Posted by jbjb
It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"
Originally Posted by regnisI have to disagree here. If you are using American English, as opposed to British (English) English, the period goes inside the quotation marks.Originally Posted by Garnabby---> National Register of Historic Places listings in Devils Tower National Monument.Originally Posted by monet
https://anagram-solver.net/Imagine%2...0?partial=true
Monet, the period goes after, unless the phrase is a full sentence. Ask any English teacher. Besides, it just looks stupid, the way that you did it above.
Garnabby
Garnabby is online now
Gold
Garnabby's Avatar
Join Date
Aug 2020
Posts
741 ---> Just text 741741
The following is from Grammarly.com but if you google the rule is pretty clear.
Do commas and periods go inside or outside quotation marks?
Commas and periods always go inside the quotation marks in American English; dashes, colons, and semicolons almost always go outside the quotation marks; question marks and exclamation marks sometimes go inside, sometimes stay outside.
In British English it is the opposite with some exceptions. Garnabby--if you are in Canada I am not sure which would be correct but I assume your way would be correct.The way I figure it is that a word that is emphasized or whatever by quotation marks can be shifted throughout a sentence from its start to its end. Then there is no reason to punctuate it in a different way. A comma, or period, in the quotation marks can't change the emphasis or whatever, and, to shift the quotation marks past the end of the sentence, to include the period or whatever, neither, makes much sense.
I was kind of "tongue in cheek" with the remark to ask any English teacher about it. It's one of the never-ending arguments about the language.
Here is one question about it at an English forum. Yargs is one of the top experts there.
https://english.stackexchange.com/qu...&s=7%7C52.9207
Last edited by Garnabby; 06-04-2022 at 11:54 AM.
Every one /everyone knows it all; yet, no thing /nothing is truly known by any one /anyone. Similarly, the suckers think that they win, but, the house always wins, unless to hand out an even worse beating.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsa6ojQcYXQ
Garnabby + OppsIdidItAgain + ThomasClines (or TomasHClines) + The Grim Reaper + LMR + OneHitWonder (or 1HitWonder, 1Hit1der) + Bill Yung ---> GOTTLOB1, or GOTTLOB = Praise to God!
Blog at https://garnabby.blogspot.com/
Secret VCT codeword, RIP + ...
--->Originally Posted by tableplay
The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literature.
Comprehensive list of Threats to Authentication Procedures and Data.
Hidden Terrors: The Truth About U.S. Police Operations in Latin America.
North of Ireland Operative Butchers' and Allied Workers' Association.
https://anagram-solver.net/Secret%20....?partial=true
Well, the first line must have to do with, spilled over from, the above dispute about English and usage. Tablepooey's "comments" came on the heels of Regnis' reply.
Yeah, threats, terrors, and butchers, form and emanate from the aura of Tablepooey.
Last edited by Garnabby; 06-04-2022 at 11:47 AM.
Every one /everyone knows it all; yet, no thing /nothing is truly known by any one /anyone. Similarly, the suckers think that they win, but, the house always wins, unless to hand out an even worse beating.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsa6ojQcYXQ
Garnabby + OppsIdidItAgain + ThomasClines (or TomasHClines) + The Grim Reaper + LMR + OneHitWonder (or 1HitWonder, 1Hit1der) + Bill Yung ---> GOTTLOB1, or GOTTLOB = Praise to God!
Blog at https://garnabby.blogspot.com/
Maybe, if old Tablepooey got his "shit" in order, than old, "introspective" Monet might be able to follow suit. Monet has a very hard time trying to figure out what is real. Ha.Originally Posted by monetHe means well.Originally Posted by tableplayYou continue to demonstrate what a pile of shit you are with your unprovoked attacks Bill.Originally Posted by Garnabby
I give him a pass because, you know, he has to live in Canada.
Not Easy.
He has a Prime Minister who is pretty darn close to Hitler.
They make the best Maple Syrup though.
That is, if you can actually get the authentic version.
I read somewhere that 76% of Honey sold in the United States is Fake.
This makes me wonder how much of Canadian Labeled Maple Syrup is genuine?
Every one /everyone knows it all; yet, no thing /nothing is truly known by any one /anyone. Similarly, the suckers think that they win, but, the house always wins, unless to hand out an even worse beating.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsa6ojQcYXQ
Garnabby + OppsIdidItAgain + ThomasClines (or TomasHClines) + The Grim Reaper + LMR + OneHitWonder (or 1HitWonder, 1Hit1der) + Bill Yung ---> GOTTLOB1, or GOTTLOB = Praise to God!
Blog at https://garnabby.blogspot.com/
Bill the troll is an evil old soul. He stirs the pot and he does it a lot.Originally Posted by GarnabbyMaybe, if old Tablepooey got his "shit" in order, than old, "introspective" Monet might be able to follow suit. Monet has a very hard time trying to figure out what is real. Ha.Originally Posted by monetHe means well.Originally Posted by tableplay
I give him a pass because, you know, he has to live in Canada.
Not Easy.
He has a Prime Minister who is pretty darn close to Hitler.
They make the best Maple Syrup though.
That is, if you can actually get the authentic version.
I read somewhere that 76% of Honey sold in the United States is Fake.
This makes me wonder how much of Canadian Labeled Maple Syrup is genuine?
Fixed it up for you, the one speaking in tongues.Originally Posted by tableplay
--->
I ain't the sharpest tool in the shed. [What you're actually saying. Ha.]
https://anagram-solver.net/%E2%91%AC...0?partial=true
Note that 36 = (-1 + 37) ---> 137, and, 63 ---> 36 = (-1 + 37) ---> 1√97 ---> 197. And, that with a = 1, b = 2, ... z = 26, and, ⑬ = 0, the above expression resolves to 666. Or, 720 ---> 72, in reverse ordinal, with z = 1 to a = 26, which, I guess, is the me-part of all of this without getting directly into the "secret VCT codeword, RIP" part. As in July 2.
http://www.gematrinator.com/calculator/index.php
Today, 08:13 PM #239
Garnabby
Garnabby is online now
Gold
Garnabby's Avatar
Join Date
Aug 2020
Posts
750 ------> 720, with 5 ---> 2, the other way.
Last edited by Garnabby; 06-04-2022 at 09:49 PM.
Every one /everyone knows it all; yet, no thing /nothing is truly known by any one /anyone. Similarly, the suckers think that they win, but, the house always wins, unless to hand out an even worse beating.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsa6ojQcYXQ
Garnabby + OppsIdidItAgain + ThomasClines (or TomasHClines) + The Grim Reaper + LMR + OneHitWonder (or 1HitWonder, 1Hit1der) + Bill Yung ---> GOTTLOB1, or GOTTLOB = Praise to God!
Blog at https://garnabby.blogspot.com/
The great part about the above is that I had to put in the 36's, which each lowered the count by 36, to get the reverse ordinal count of 720, which was my part in all of it. Ie, the ordinal count was 666 with only the numeral 13 as zero in it. Pooey's part as 666 with 13 was invariant wrt the 36's. Some really and actually bad "shit" going on there. Ha.
Anyway, it's was bitch to try to find one of those seven-segment display numerals, so, I attached merely an image of such a 2, and a 5. Oh well.
I group the integers up to a dozen, number base 12, as {0, 3, 6, 9}, {1, 2, 7, 8}, and, (4, 5, 10, 11} in between, as in {0, √9 = √(3^2), 6, 9}, and, {1, 2, 7, 2^3}. There's a slightly different way with , say, {1, 4, 7}, but, it goes back to {1, 2^2, 7}.
--------------->
resolves to 666.
Incidentally, the full reduction, and reverse full reduction, gematria counts were 243, and 306. The 306 ---> 36, or 2*153, and, the 243 = 3^5^1 ---> 153.
243 is 3303 in base 4, 300 in base 9, 183 in base 12, and, 113 in base 15.
306 is 132 = 2*66 in base 16, 216 = 6*6*6 in base 12, 370 in base 9, and, 1230 = 30*41 in base 6.
306 = (9^2 + 15^2), and, is the telephone area code for Saskatchewan, Canada - likely home to some good maple syrup, the real stuff.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saska...yrup-1.3579794
Garnabby
Garnabby is online now
Gold
Garnabby's Avatar
Join Date
Aug 2020
Posts
751 ----------> Pretty sure that it's a prime, but, it goes 721.
Last edited by Garnabby; 06-05-2022 at 08:10 AM.
Every one /everyone knows it all; yet, no thing /nothing is truly known by any one /anyone. Similarly, the suckers think that they win, but, the house always wins, unless to hand out an even worse beating.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsa6ojQcYXQ
Garnabby + OppsIdidItAgain + ThomasClines (or TomasHClines) + The Grim Reaper + LMR + OneHitWonder (or 1HitWonder, 1Hit1der) + Bill Yung ---> GOTTLOB1, or GOTTLOB = Praise to God!
Blog at https://garnabby.blogspot.com/
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
