The Interview With Alan M. On June 16

[MaxPen]

adding to my opinion above, I would like to post word for word a post by "our" mickeycrimm at WoV from August 2013. I am also linking to the thread for context. I have highlighted a few key phrases, my point being this shit of Singer's just keeps coming. THIS was 9 years ago. Of course mickey has changed a bit since then. But Singer....not one single bit. Bitter angry losing player, attacking players that win legitimately based on math and never stopping with his escalating BS claims that defy math.

From mickeycrim:
I got a couple of hate mails from Rob Singer last night. Someone tipped him off to this thread. He is now following it. If you've never had the pleasure of receiving a Singer hate mail his motus operandi is to belittle, demean, brow beat, smear, disparage, slight and insult you. I think he looks for some sort of reaction. It's like he gets his jollies off if he can drag you down to his level. Others who know more about it than me describe him as malignant narcissistic.

What was he blasting me about? My criticism of Bob (dancer) over the Revel promotion. I know Singer well enough to know that he will come up with any reason, any pretext, to insult and demean someone. Not long ago he tried to enlist me in denouncing Dancer as a sick, pathetic, degenerate, compulsive gambler, which caused his marriage to fail. Singer has been bashing Bob like that for years. I told Singer that I didn't think Bob was any of those things....and I wasn't the least bit interested in his personal life. So Singer emailed me back calling ME a sick, pathetic, degenerate, compulsive gambler, and a few other things that I won't repeat here. And the hate mail didn't let up for a week. I'm damned if I DON'T criticize Dancer. I'm damned if I DO criticize Dancer. Like I said, Singer will use any pretext to insult and demean.

I don't have any more time to waste on Singer. There is no value, nothing to be gained in exchanging with him. I've told him not to ever contact me again and blocked his emails. There is a reason he has been thrown off of every forum he has ever participated in.

https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-...or-everyone/9/

That's how he grooms his future servants. The weak amongst us break down and climb full on the whole 9.5. Once aboard the Singer train they are usually lost forever.

RIP hobo Man Servant

[Ozzy]

adding to my opinion above, I would like to post word for word a post by "our" mickeycrimm at WoV from August 2013. I am also linking to the thread for context. I have highlighted a few key phrases, my point being this shit of Singer's just keeps coming. THIS was 9 years ago. Of course mickey has changed a bit since then. But Singer....not one single bit. Bitter angry losing player, attacking players that win legitimately based on math and never stopping with his escalating BS claims that defy math.

From mickeycrim:
I got a couple of hate mails from Rob Singer last night. Someone tipped him off to this thread. He is now following it. If you've never had the pleasure of receiving a Singer hate mail his motus operandi is to belittle, demean, brow beat, smear, disparage, slight and insult you. I think he looks for some sort of reaction. It's like he gets his jollies off if he can drag you down to his level. Others who know more about it than me describe him as malignant narcissistic.

What was he blasting me about? My criticism of Bob (dancer) over the Revel promotion. I know Singer well enough to know that he will come up with any reason, any pretext, to insult and demean someone. Not long ago he tried to enlist me in denouncing Dancer as a sick, pathetic, degenerate, compulsive gambler, which caused his marriage to fail. Singer has been bashing Bob like that for years. I told Singer that I didn't think Bob was any of those things....and I wasn't the least bit interested in his personal life. So Singer emailed me back calling ME a sick, pathetic, degenerate, compulsive gambler, and a few other things that I won't repeat here. And the hate mail didn't let up for a week. I'm damned if I DON'T criticize Dancer. I'm damned if I DO criticize Dancer. Like I said, Singer will use any pretext to insult and demean.

I don't have any more time to waste on Singer. There is no value, nothing to be gained in exchanging with him. I've told him not to ever contact me again and blocked his emails. There is a reason he has been thrown off of every forum he has ever participated in.

https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-...or-everyone/9/

No way that's Crimm

[redietz]

Today was the definition of pathetic. I'm not going to comment further on an old man off the rails. It's a cautionary tale. If I lose discipline or intelligence, that could be me in 10 years.

[Garnabby]

Today was the definition of pathetic. I'm not going to comment further on an old man off the rails. It's a cautionary tale. If I lose discipline or intelligence, that could be me in 10 years.

That's you now.

Sorry, Red, but, it is what it is. Obsession with past stuff that didn't really or actually mean anything back then, either.

Same with Alan.

[kewlJ]

I don't think anyone on this forum will believe anything I might post about contacting Caesars. So I suggest that jbjb, Maxpen, Redietz, jdaewoo and everyone else who has challenged my career or called me an idiot to call Caesars themselves. But don't forget to get those photos from Caesars!

By the way... what if Singer was pulling your chain about a trip to Vegas?

I would believe you Alan. Go get a quote from one of these people to confirm or deny and name who it is and lets go from there.

"what is Singer was pulling our chain about this trip to Vegas" you ask?

Alan this is renegging on a wager and a rather large one. AND invoking the name of respected Gambling Attorny Bob Nersesian in his BS lies that he deposited $700k with Mr. Nersesian. On any other forum, these things would be grounds for permanent banning. When is enough, enough for you Alan?

Where is that guy who two years was so upset that Singer had "used him and lied to him"? remember this quote Alan? "always an explanation, but never any proof".

[MaxPen]

I don't think anyone on this forum will believe anything I might post about contacting Caesars. So I suggest that jbjb, Maxpen, Redietz, jdaewoo and everyone else who has challenged my career or called me an idiot to call Caesars themselves. But don't forget to get those photos from Caesars!

By the way... what if Singer was pulling your chain about a trip to Vegas?

I would believe you Alan. Go get a quote from one of these people to confirm or deny and name who it is and lets go from there.

"what is Singer was pulling our chain about this trip to Vegas" you ask?

Alan this is renegging on a wager and a rather large one. AND invoking the name of respected Gambling Attorny Bob Nersesian in his BS lies that he deposited $700k with Mr. Nersesian. On any other forum, these things would be grounds for permanent banning. When is enough, enough for you Alan?

Where is that guy who two years was so upset that Singer had "used him and lied to him"? remember this quote Alan? "always an explanation, but never any proof".

Alan is the other fully groomed Singer disciple. Once on board the Singer 9.5 there is no coming back. Him and the hobo will forever be known as the Brokeback Boys......RIP

[Garnabby]

Come on KJ, let the bullgarbage fly! People want to hear bullgarbage, not, the truth. May the best bullgarbage win. Anyway, the only believable stuff out of Vegas is the bullgarbage. Ha.

[Garnabby]

Alan is the other fully groomed Singer deciphel. Once on board the Singer 9.5 there is no coming back. Him and the hobo will forever be known as the Brokeback Boys......RIP

--->

Let There Be Light: Modern Cosmology and Kabbalah, a New Conversation Between Science and Religion.

Conventions for mediating and coordinating interactions between members of large groups.

Golden Globe Award for Best Performance by an Actor In A Television Series - Musical Or Comedy.

https://anagram-solver.net/Alanisthe...0?partial=true


P.S. Special thanks to Max, who couldn't spell if his life depended on it. Ha.

[unowme]

I have a different take than most of you. I think these two threads and the reactions to Rob were hilarious. Of course I'm just a troublemaker who like to stir the pot and who knew Rob when he was trolling the Las Vegas Advisor forums (under several aliases) 20 years ago. Alan (MoneyLA) was there too....so it's like old home week for me. Rob caused quite a stir to the point where he was banned. I actually think there's some interesting psychology at work.

I can't wait to read Alan's article on this one. Alan always contributed a lot of good Vegas tidbits back then and I always enjoyed his posts.

Here's the thread where Rob was banned back in 2007. Both myself (as AlanLeroy) and rdietz both posted in that thread. No matter how much things change, they kind of stay the same. Like 'The Perfect Storm'.

https://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/foru...ll-rob-singer/

Until the next kerfuffle! Good luck to all.

[Garnabby]

Here's the thread where Rob was banned back in 2007. Both myself (as AlanLeroy) and rdietz both posted in that thread. No matter how much things change, they kind of stay the same.

Makes total "sense" now. It's called a fifty-year-old grudge match (between fools who still don't know any better). Corny as Goddamned Hell. Ha.

[mickeycrimm]

I'm still open to receiving suggested questions for the interview. But they need to be relevant.

So far Redietz has said he was going to send me questions via private messages but I received nothing. When I tried to message Redietz I discovered he has such a backlog of private messages that the system will not accept any new messages for him.

Ask to see the original jackpot photo on his phone and a copy of his May bank statement showing him depositing the million dollar check. I explained above how to get details on the photo for Android or IPhone.

If anyone were doing a piece for any newspaper from my beloved Pottsville Republican (Pulitzer winner, by the way) to the New York Times, here are the classic questions:

1) In what casino was the jackpot won?
2) What day and time was it won?
3) Who verified the jackpot for the casino?
4) How was the payment made?
5) How does Rob intend to spend the money?
.

Redietz' 2nd cousins wife's brother knew a man that was a janitor at the New York Times. So redietz knows all about journalism.

[mickeycrimm]

If anyone were doing a piece for any newspaper from my beloved Pottsville Republican (Pulitzer winner, by the way) to the New York Times, here are the classic questions:

1) In what casino was the jackpot won?
2) What day and time was it won?
3) Who verified the jackpot for the casino?
4) How was the payment made?
5) How does Rob intend to spend the money?

If someone skips any of these questions, and there is no valid reason to skip any of them, the interview is silly. I think you'll agree that any editor would assume you asked all of these.

If someone is posting publicly about having won a jackpot, then the reasons for an NDA go out the window. Wife or children finding out? Read VCT. Debtors? Read VCT. People hitting you up for cash from afar? They can read VCT. I don't know why someone would write that they signed an NDA with a casino while posting publicly about what they signed the NDA for. Don't want anyone to know because you may blow it all back to the casinos and that would be embarrassing? Why post about it on VCT?

The cherry on top, of course, is Alan's researching the use of NDAs between casinos and jackpot winners.

Redietz I think you've reported that you only play 25-cents video poker. W2Gs are rare for 25-cent players.

Let me assure you that items 1-3 of your list are on a W2G.

Item #4 might be noted. I've had notations about split payments.

Item #5 is interesting. Maybe he'll buy another Newell. Do you really care?

I don't know of any casino that will allow a member of the general public to inquire about another player. But there is info on a W2G that will show if it is true.

I am not bound by any NDA. And a casino doesnt need an NDA to say "we dont comment on our patrons."

Clear out your private messages. I wonder why you have made so many?

You're missing the point. These are questions any reporter would ask, and any editor would require that they ask. What's on a W2G is irrelevant from my perspective in terms of establishing who won a particular jackpot. All the W2G establishes is who is claiming the tax burden. You've ignored what I've had to say regarding W2Gs, but I'll repeat it.

All that a W2G demonstrates is who is paying taxes for a particular win. That is all that it establishes. Unless you look at a feed of the time of the win, a W2G has limited corroborative power.

So asking all of the questions I listed, which any editor would want, opens the person being interviewed up to independent investigation and corroboration. For example, I'm reasonably sure that a win of that magnitude would be kept on video for ages. If you ask the alleged winner where in the casino it was won or who was around when it was won, then you have details which can be corroborated.

You wonder why I have so many messages? LOL. I'm popular. Or I'm trying to recruit children for porn movies. One or the other.

I don't play with folders or know how to rearrange things, so every message stays put until I need to create space, in which case I delete ones I think have the least long term use. That creates some poignant historical moments, like I have messages when you gave me Frank Kneeland's email and I bought his book. I hate to just delete those. I keep some of the exchanges, like when you saw that I won the Race to the Super Bowl for 25K and you told me to post a link and I didn't because I wanted you to admit in print that you saw that I won it. And then Rob went off saying I didn't win it, and you wouldn't confirm that I did. Exchanges like that have historical value.

Why would someone themselves to pay taxes on a jackpot they didn't hit?

[Garnabby]

You and old, mad Max were made for each other, Mickey. Keep it up!

[redietz]

Redietz I think you've reported that you only play 25-cents video poker. W2Gs are rare for 25-cent players.

Let me assure you that items 1-3 of your list are on a W2G.

Item #4 might be noted. I've had notations about split payments.

Item #5 is interesting. Maybe he'll buy another Newell. Do you really care?

I don't know of any casino that will allow a member of the general public to inquire about another player. But there is info on a W2G that will show if it is true.

I am not bound by any NDA. And a casino doesnt need an NDA to say "we dont comment on our patrons."

Clear out your private messages. I wonder why you have made so many?

You're missing the point. These are questions any reporter would ask, and any editor would require that they ask. What's on a W2G is irrelevant from my perspective in terms of establishing who won a particular jackpot. All the W2G establishes is who is claiming the tax burden. You've ignored what I've had to say regarding W2Gs, but I'll repeat it.

All that a W2G demonstrates is who is paying taxes for a particular win. That is all that it establishes. Unless you look at a feed of the time of the win, a W2G has limited corroborative power.

So asking all of the questions I listed, which any editor would want, opens the person being interviewed up to independent investigation and corroboration. For example, I'm reasonably sure that a win of that magnitude would be kept on video for ages. If you ask the alleged winner where in the casino it was won or who was around when it was won, then you have details which can be corroborated.

You wonder why I have so many messages? LOL. I'm popular. Or I'm trying to recruit children for porn movies. One or the other.

I don't play with folders or know how to rearrange things, so every message stays put until I need to create space, in which case I delete ones I think have the least long term use. That creates some poignant historical moments, like I have messages when you gave me Frank Kneeland's email and I bought his book. I hate to just delete those. I keep some of the exchanges, like when you saw that I won the Race to the Super Bowl for 25K and you told me to post a link and I didn't because I wanted you to admit in print that you saw that I won it. And then Rob went off saying I didn't win it, and you wouldn't confirm that I did. Exchanges like that have historical value.

Why would someone themselves to pay taxes on a jackpot they didn't hit?

Please, mickey. You've gotta be smarter than this.

[Garnabby]

Red, Mickey goes from casino to casino for money that people leave in the slot machines. Quarters most likely. He'll never be any more than he is now.

[mickeycrimm]

Redietz I really can't help you. But if you really think Rob would accept the tax liability on someone else's $1.6+-million of wins then he has more money than anyone thinks.

Best of luck Perry White. You're the best editor. Great Caesars Ghost!

I wanted to correct one thing. I just got back from lunch. The book I bought was Frank Scoblete's, not Frank Kneeland's. I conflated the Franks' last names. I asked for Kneeland's email at some point, and I also asked for Scoblete's, which led to me getting Scoblete's book. Both Franks were very polite and easy to get along with.

And Alan, if you really think Person A hasn't accept Person B's tax liability on a regular basis, you haven't hung out at many racetracks or sports books the last 50 years. In other words, you're pretty naive for the son of mob lawyer.

Instead of playing games and trying to impress everyone with your highly secret knowledge why don't you explain to us the purpose of one gambler accepting the tax liability of another gambler.

I know one reason it's done but I don't think it's the same way you are talking about.

[redietz]

Ask to see the original jackpot photo on his phone and a copy of his May bank statement showing him depositing the million dollar check. I explained above how to get details on the photo for Android or IPhone.

If anyone were doing a piece for any newspaper from my beloved Pottsville Republican (Pulitzer winner, by the way) to the New York Times, here are the classic questions:

1) In what casino was the jackpot won?
2) What day and time was it won?
3) Who verified the jackpot for the casino?
4) How was the payment made?
5) How does Rob intend to spend the money?
.

Redietz' 2nd cousins wife's brother knew a man that was a janitor at the New York Times. So redietz knows all about journalism.

Well, I was a journalism major for two years until I switched over to English/writing option at Penn State. My first "real job" was as sportswriter/photographer for a weekly newspaper in Pennsylvania. I covered and photographed all sports, wrote the columns, and did a handicapping column. Previously, while in college, I wrote and co-wrote sports columns for small local papers and had my photos published. Back then I developed my own photos using the newspaper's darkrooms. My mother-in-law wrote for the local papers and my father-in-law took photos. He had taught me how to use a darkroom.

The guy I trained under in college was one of the best science writers of that generation. He was my advisor. His name was Bob Gannon, and if you haven't heard of him, you probably should have. He had more than a hundred feature stories published in Popular Science. He was the "adventure editor." He taught me the rules and regs of science writing and he was my go-to guy when I needed a reference letter for grad school or jobs.

https://www.popsci.com/military-avia...non-1931-2003/


Now this isn't the same as having worked a lifetime in journalism as Alan has, but it's possible I'm the second most experienced journalist on this forum. I have had a handful of op eds published in various papers during my 40-year stint as a handicapper. Plus an award-winning essay in The Humanist. Plus some other stuff. My blog is, I guess, a kind of pseudo-journalism, but it's up to between 500 and 900 reads a month, so somebody is reading it.

I guess, if anybody is going to criticize the best journalist on this forum, the duty falls to arguably the second most experienced journalist on the forum.

[redietz]

Redietz I really can't help you. But if you really think Rob would accept the tax liability on someone else's $1.6+-million of wins then he has more money than anyone thinks.

Best of luck Perry White. You're the best editor. Great Caesars Ghost!

I wanted to correct one thing. I just got back from lunch. The book I bought was Frank Scoblete's, not Frank Kneeland's. I conflated the Franks' last names. I asked for Kneeland's email at some point, and I also asked for Scoblete's, which led to me getting Scoblete's book. Both Franks were very polite and easy to get along with.

And Alan, if you really think Person A hasn't accept Person B's tax liability on a regular basis, you haven't hung out at many racetracks or sports books the last 50 years. In other words, you're pretty naive for the son of mob lawyer.

Instead of playing games and trying to impress everyone with your highly secret knowledge why don't you explain to us the purpose of one gambler accepting the tax liability of another gambler.

I know one reason it's done but I don't think it's the same way you are talking about.

Figure it out, mickey. Jesus.

[mickeycrimm]

When I have important meetings I always show up and then leave before the scheduled starting time.

Me too. Why waste time with meetings when you can spend weeks and hours of writing prepping for a meeting, and then skip the meeting and go right on to prepping for the next meeting?

I hope Max unleashes the dogs of war. Rob.Singer deserves it.

He really does deserve some retribution. It just takes effort to execute. I am pretty lazy. Life has kind of delivered some comeuppance to the despicable old man. Is that enough? That's the question.

What? You don't like getting played, maxie?

Elderly retired person with to much time on his hands finds way to get young smart alecky idiots to waste months of their time on stupid bullshit in a futile attempt to show they are intelligent. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

[Garnabby]

Figure it out, mickey. Jesus.

---> Cities of Turkey.

https://anagram-solver.net/Figure%20...0?partial=true