Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 56

Thread: Got it All Right

  1. #1
    Mickey will love me for this, but for those following my blog's "Propaganda Files" entries, especially this last week, I appear to have gotten almost everything correct on multiple fronts. Either I'm prescient, or professional gamblers have a nose for the news.

    First, I will post the links to recent blog entries. Then, I will post a link to the NYTimes story coming out today regarding CDC data.


    https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...ation-and.html

    https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...d-tactics.html

    https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...-two-what.html


    Here's the NYTimes report:

    https://news.yahoo.com/cdc-isnt-publ...124915536.html

  2. #2
    News flash: no one follows your blog

  3. #3
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Mickey will love me for this, but for those following my blog's "Propaganda Files" entries, especially this last week, I appear to have gotten almost everything correct on multiple fronts. Either I'm prescient, or professional gamblers have a nose for the news.

    First, I will post the links to recent blog entries. Then, I will post a link to the NYTimes story coming out today regarding CDC data.


    https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...ation-and.html

    https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...d-tactics.html

    https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...-two-what.html


    Here's the NYTimes report:

    https://news.yahoo.com/cdc-isnt-publ...124915536.html
    Damn bro you nailed it.

    All those cucked out by faker'n fake news on this board will have nothing to say though.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  4. #4
    Originally Posted by mcap View Post
    News flash: no one follows your blog

    I agree. Last month it was around 600. Modest by any standards.

  5. #5
    I think I clicked on it once. I don't really read blogs though.
    FraudJ's word is worth less than the prop cash in Singer's safe...RIP

  6. #6
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Damn bro you nailed it.

    All those cucked out by faker'n fake news on this board will have nothing to say though.
    Just like ComRed, you are delusional.
    If anything, the members on this board, actually listen to conversations and decide for themselves.
    FOX, CNN, MSNBC and the MSM are all in the Entertainment Industry.
    CNN is probably the worst right now as they have to fire everyone.
    The difference between our thinking and yours is that we believe in "Live and Let Live".
    We want the Government and our Neighbors to leave us the Fuck Alone.
    Your sick, twisted side is all about Control and Neb-Nosing.
    You guys are never happy and you always want more.
    I'm not even sure most members here are independent as they probably are like me and don't register or vote.
    We don't want to be a part of your system.
    We are Anti-Establishment.
    Hence all the Vulturing, VP Play and out right degenerate behavior.
    Leave us the Fuck alone!

  7. #7
    Originally Posted by mcap View Post
    News flash: no one follows your blog
    I have no idea what Redietz's blog says about this stuff because I didn't click on any of the links. I am never going to click on any of the links.

  8. #8
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    I have no idea what Redietz's blog says about this stuff because I didn't click on any of the links. I am never going to click on any of the links.
    #METOO

    Anyways, I go downstairs to get something to drink.
    My uncle is watching TV and a Hershey's Commercial comes on.
    I literally can't find this commercial on the internet as of right now.
    But it's something about Gay this and Gay that and SHE something.
    They literally have little girls promoting how proud they are to be Gay.
    That sort of thing used to be considered child abuse.

    This is what I am talking about.
    The Fucking Liberals can't leave us the Fuck alone.
    They have to cram their shit down our throats every chance they get.
    Why do we have to celebrate Gay's or Women or Women of Color?
    Can't we all just buy a Fucking Chocolate Bar and Celebrate people and or life?
    Or maybe just eat the Fucking Chocolate Bar and enjoy the endorphin rush?
    I mean the world isn't fair and it will never be some sort of Utopia.
    What would happen if some company came out with a commercial stating that we are celebrating White People for the month of March???
    The Left would lose their Fucking Minds is what would happen.
    Didn't Coca-Cola just force their new employees to be less white?
    lol
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  9. #9
    Originally Posted by monet View Post
    Didn't Coca-Cola just force their new employees to be less white?
    lol
    Thanks Monet, I didn't hear about the Coca-Cola thing but I totally believe it.

  10. #10
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    Thanks Monet, I didn't hear about the Coca-Cola thing but I totally believe it.
    Got to be more careful now.
    It seems this is the beginning of the end of free speech in America.


  11. #11
    Originally Posted by monet View Post
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    Thanks Monet, I didn't hear about the Coca-Cola thing but I totally believe it.
    Got to be more careful now.
    It seems this is the beginning of the end of free speech in America.

    Thanks for the link Monet: Russell showed one caption that said the government was forcing social media companies to suppress dissenting views. I disagree with this. I think social media companies are complicit with the government in suppressing dissenting (i.e. the truth) views.
    Anyhow, Russell's podcasts overall are great and this one was mostly spot on IMHO.

  12. #12
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    Thanks for the link Monet: Russell showed one caption that said the government was forcing social media companies to suppress dissenting views. I disagree with this. I think social media companies are complicit with the government in suppressing dissenting (i.e. the truth) views.
    Anyhow, Russell's podcasts overall are great and this one was mostly spot on IMHO.
    He made a couple good points and this was one of them...

    What the Government wants is control.
    What the Corporate World wants is money.
    What both of them want is power.
    What neither of them care about is YOU!

  13. #13
    Originally Posted by monet View Post
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    Thanks for the link Monet: Russell showed one caption that said the government was forcing social media companies to suppress dissenting views. I disagree with this. I think social media companies are complicit with the government in suppressing dissenting (i.e. the truth) views.
    Anyhow, Russell's podcasts overall are great and this one was mostly spot on IMHO.
    He made a couple good points and this was one of them...

    What the Government wants is control.
    What the Corporate World wants is money.
    What both of them want is power.
    What neither of them care about is YOU!
    Yes. Additionally the Corporate World wants control.

  14. #14
    Originally Posted by monet View Post
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Damn bro you nailed it.

    All those cucked out by faker'n fake news on this board will have nothing to say though.
    Just like ComRed, you are delusional.
    If anything, the members on this board, actually listen to conversations and decide for themselves.
    FOX, CNN, MSNBC and the MSM are all in the Entertainment Industry.
    CNN is probably the worst right now as they have to fire everyone.
    The difference between our thinking and yours is that we believe in "Live and Let Live".
    We want the Government and our Neighbors to leave us the Fuck Alone.
    Your sick, twisted side is all about Control and Neb-Nosing.
    You guys are never happy and you always want more.
    I'm not even sure most members here are independent as they probably are like me and don't register or vote.
    We don't want to be a part of your system.
    We are Anti-Establishment.
    Hence all the Vulturing, VP Play and out right degenerate behavior.
    Leave us the Fuck alone!
    I forgot about this thead.

    Yea, I'm all about control because I believe vaccines work even if they're not near as good as we had hoped.

    "my system"

    "anti-establishment" So much you go to fake news to get your scoops.

    Anyway, that was a good response you gave. I'll pat myself on the back.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  15. #15
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Mickey will love me for this, but for those following my blog's "Propaganda Files" entries, especially this last week, I appear to have gotten almost everything correct on multiple fronts. Either I'm prescient, or professional gamblers have a nose for the news.

    First, I will post the links to recent blog entries. Then, I will post a link to the NYTimes story coming out today regarding CDC data.


    https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...ation-and.html

    https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...d-tactics.html

    https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...-two-what.html


    Here's the NYTimes report:

    https://news.yahoo.com/cdc-isnt-publ...124915536.html
    Damn bro you nailed it.

    All those cucked out by faker'n fake news on this board will have nothing to say though.
    What were you right about?
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  16. #16
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Yea, I'm all about control because I believe vaccines work even if they're not near as good as we had hoped.

    "my system"

    "anti-establishment" So much you go to fake news to get your scoops.

    Anyway, that was a good response you gave. I'll pat myself on the back.
    In March of 2021 Rachel Maddow said "A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them, the virus cannot use that person to go anywhere else. It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people."

    Was the above statement fake news?
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  17. #17
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Yea, I'm all about control because I believe vaccines work even if they're not near as good as we had hoped.

    "my system"

    "anti-establishment" So much you go to fake news to get your scoops.

    Anyway, that was a good response you gave. I'll pat myself on the back.
    In March of 2021 Rachel Maddow said "A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them, the virus cannot use that person to go anywhere else. It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people."

    Was the above statement fake news?

    It was dead wrong. Ignorant is a better word. Or propaganda. I try to save the phrase "fake news" for things like interviews where responses are for the most part known in advance -- Fox, MSNBC, and CNN do a lot of those. In my opinion, Fox and CNN are actually worse than MSBC for "scripted interviews."

    Do you have a specific source for the attribution to Maddow? If I haven't personally heard the quote, I try to attribute the source whenever possible.

    If Maddow said that, she was clueless from the beginning. With the original variant, viral loads were higher for unvaccinated infected than vaccinated, but that's no longer really the case, which is why you don't hear about viral loads any more.

  18. #18
    I looked this up. This seems to have actually been a result of both Maddow saying this on March 29 and Maddow interviewing Dr. Rochelle Walensky, who said this (of our CDC, of course). The reporting of this is March 30, with a reference to it having been said Tuesday, which is that date.

    Maddow and Walensky are engaged in propaganda here. Maddow should have been less arrogant about declaring things, and Walensky should have been savvy enough to anticipate variants eventually finding ways around the vaccine's initial effectiveness, which happened in a couple of months.

    Really, very irresponsible, bordering on criminal. And certainly there should be civil liability, because at any given time, variants exist in real time in the population to which what the CDC expert said does not apply. So even in the case of the CDC expert being correct for 90% of the population, that left a huge chunk for which it was irresponsible.

    As I say often in the "Propaganda Files," institutions do not have the right to lie to you to get what they deem is an optimal result in service of the "greater good."

  19. #19
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Mickey will love me for this, but for those following my blog's "Propaganda Files" entries, especially this last week, I appear to have gotten almost everything correct on multiple fronts. Either I'm prescient, or professional gamblers have a nose for the news.

    First, I will post the links to recent blog entries. Then, I will post a link to the NYTimes story coming out today regarding CDC data.


    https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...ation-and.html

    https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...d-tactics.html

    https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...-two-what.html


    Here's the NYTimes report:

    https://news.yahoo.com/cdc-isnt-publ...124915536.html
    How did your advocacy of a long lockdown square with the Johns Hopkins study?
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  20. #20
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Mickey will love me for this, but for those following my blog's "Propaganda Files" entries, especially this last week, I appear to have gotten almost everything correct on multiple fronts. Either I'm prescient, or professional gamblers have a nose for the news.

    First, I will post the links to recent blog entries. Then, I will post a link to the NYTimes story coming out today regarding CDC data.


    https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...ation-and.html

    https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...d-tactics.html

    https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...-two-what.html


    Here's the NYTimes report:

    https://news.yahoo.com/cdc-isnt-publ...124915536.html
    How did your advocacy of a long lockdown square with the Johns Hopkins study?


    If you'll notice, the Johns Hopkins study conclusions had to do with just the U.S. and western Europe, which is not the majority of the planet. And lockdowns did reduce deaths in Europe and the U.S. I suppose the calculus is they didn't prevent enough deaths in the U.S. and Europe to make them "worthwhile."

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •