Page 15 of 30 FirstFirst ... 511121314151617181925 ... LastLast
Results 281 to 300 of 587

Thread: Recent interview with Eliot Jacobson

  1. #281
    Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    Eliot,


    Over the years, were you ever asked to consult regarding roulette APs or did you usually out source that to someone else like Zender or Allison?
    I've really enjoyed reading your articles over the years, especially regarding the Lucky Nines side bets. I appreciated the detailed math.
    From another thread I now understand that you are a roulette AP. Fabulous stuff, if you can do it. I saw a talk by a pro at a conference I went to in 2012 and was absolutely convinced.

    And no, I personally never did anything other than loss-rebate & match play stuff with roulette AP. Of course, if a casino offers you a 20% loss rebate deal on single-0 roulette with no minimum play time, that's a good life.

  2. #282
    Elliot,

    I zoomed in on your comment, " I would sometimes discuss the physical features and mechanics that lead to roulette wheels becoming biased."

    That has always been the secret to success with bias wheel play...being able to identify the physical bias causes on sight, and then tracking to confirm that the defects (wear, or assembly flaws) were indeed correlating with the predicted . Meaning, finding the biased wheel first, rather than tracking raw numbers in the blind hope of finding bias. Having access to various wheels that I could assemble, and disassemble gave me unique insights into what to look for. By using the overhead lights in the casino and tracking the way their reflections moved over the various components on the wheels, I could quickly find the best wheels. As a team, we did exploit some rebates, but nothing as large as 20%. The single zero wheels are not usually as biased as the double zero wheels. Partly because casinos consider the double zero wheel to be an unbeatable carnival game.
    Last edited by Snowman; 08-04-2022 at 09:18 PM.

  3. #283
    Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    Elliot,

    I zoomed in on your comment, " I would sometimes discuss the physical features and mechanics that lead to roulette wheels becoming biased."

    That has always been the secret to success with bias wheel play...being able to identify the physical bias causes on sight, and then tracking to confirm that the defects (wear, or assembly flaws) were indeed correlating with the predicted . Meaning, finding the biased wheel first, rather than tracking raw numbers in the blind hope of finding bias. Having access to various wheels that I could assemble, and disassemble gave me unique insights into what to look for. By using the overhead lights in the casino and tracking the way their reflections moved over the various components on the wheels, I could quickly find the best wheels. As a team, we did exploit some rebates, but nothing as large as 20%. The single zero wheels are not usually as biased as the double zero wheels. Partly because casinos consider the double zero wheel to be an unbeatable carnival game.
    Do you know anything about legitimate AP?
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  4. #284

  5. #285
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    Math proficiency has very little to do with today's top earning players. As a matter of fact if you find yourself needing a math expert the play is not worth your time.

    I know a lot of exceptional mathletes that know next to nothing about exploiting advantages that are right in front of their face. Because they are focused on the details all the time.
    If thats the only kind of math guys you know then all you know is idiots. All you're doing is making excuses for your lack of knowledge.

    I know someone that made a lot of money off my knowledge. I taught him the plays. He wound up like you. Talking that shit about math guys are to dumb to make money.

    I quit showing him anything. The old plays left and new plays came out. But he left my area saying there was no money to be made anymore. Little did he know. He couldn't recognize the new big fat plays and didn't have me to show him anymore.

    The truth is you have an inferiority complex so have to talk shit about math guys can't do anything. It's total unadulterated BULLSHIT being thrown about by a poser pro.
    I didn't say all math guys. But a lot for sure. No inferiority complex here. I don't need anyone's input. I run my own show. Not many people can say that.

    You don’t run shit

    Riddle me this KewJefferytj

    What’s Lauberge and Dowagiac have in common?

    Did big tampa have a Somke and take in the view at Lauberge ? Maybe he should have
    . Did Raymond go blind trying to the tame the wolf at palace and Just miss it ?@9@9@


    I’m sorry these offers are voided because it seems your lose exceeds coin in that must be a malfunction.

    Perfect swapping is not the play……. you seek 8 … but 4 and 7 are the play. Back door you say ?

    Service through charter communications ? Perhaps

  6. #286
    https://mobile.twitter.com/EliotJaco...98408617394177 nah nothing to see here. Just more elites trying to grab control. Everything will be if we resist. For the love of freedom dont let the elites enslave us. Very very important.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  7. #287
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  8. #288
    This is something I've never realized. https://www.resilience.org/stories/2...ergy-skeptics/ As the demand for rare earth minerals go up they will become increasingly rare. This means MORE ENERGY to mine as the easier sources become used up.

    All bandaids. Let the hippies think they have a chance.

    There really is no way out. THere will be mass collapse of societies and IMO very likely nuclear conflicts.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  9. #289
    https://www.wired.co.uk/article/europe-drought-2023 Such a drought that in France they've banned the building of new homes ? It has just started.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  10. #290
    Originally Posted by Eliot View Post
    Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    Eliot,


    Over the years, were you ever asked to consult regarding roulette APs or did you usually out source that to someone else like Zender or Allison?
    I've really enjoyed reading your articles over the years, especially regarding the Lucky Nines side bets. I appreciated the detailed math.
    From another thread I now understand that you are a roulette AP. Fabulous stuff, if you can do it. I saw a talk by a pro at a conference I went to in 2012 and was absolutely convinced.

    And no, I personally never did anything other than loss-rebate & match play stuff with roulette AP. Of course, if a casino offers you a 20% loss rebate deal on single-0 roulette with no minimum play time, that's a good life.
    https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2...igures-it-out/

    Just making sure you people are reading my thread so you know without a doubt that we (humanity) will be going to the shitters real fast real quick in the grand scheme of things. This doesn't mean tomorrow or the next decade but in the context of Earth's history it will be immediate.

    Regardless, I didn't see the roulette article posted on here. There is a chance that our gentle readers will have missed it. Real solid read. Roulette AP still seems many more times more probable than dice control but <shrug> what do I know?
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  11. #291
    https://edition.cnn.com/2023/04/13/c...hnk/index.html sea around Shanghai rising 4 mms a year. It'll keep increasing for forseeable future. Infrastructure won't be able to keep up. Dams seem to have a peculiar way of not working
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  12. #292
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Originally Posted by Eliot View Post
    Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    Eliot,


    Over the years, were you ever asked to consult regarding roulette APs or did you usually out source that to someone else like Zender or Allison?
    I've really enjoyed reading your articles over the years, especially regarding the Lucky Nines side bets. I appreciated the detailed math.
    From another thread I now understand that you are a roulette AP. Fabulous stuff, if you can do it. I saw a talk by a pro at a conference I went to in 2012 and was absolutely convinced.

    And no, I personally never did anything other than loss-rebate & match play stuff with roulette AP. Of course, if a casino offers you a 20% loss rebate deal on single-0 roulette with no minimum play time, that's a good life.
    https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2...igures-it-out/

    Just making sure you people are reading my thread so you know without a doubt that we (humanity) will be going to the shitters real fast real quick in the grand scheme of things. This doesn't mean tomorrow or the next decade but in the context of Earth's history it will be immediate.

    Regardless, I didn't see the roulette article posted on here. There is a chance that our gentle readers will have missed it. Real solid read. Roulette AP still seems many more times more probable than dice control but <shrug> what do I know?
    Same bullshit story for 5000 years.
    Humans are like Ants.
    As soon as you tear down their home they scurry around and build it back up better than before.
    Eventually they get reset back to square one losing all information, but the cycle repeats itself.
    STFU and enjoy your life while you still can because it goes fast and then you're dead.

  13. #293
    Originally Posted by monet View Post
    Eventually they get reset back to square one losing all information, but the cycle repeats itself.
    And of course, if the Silurian hypothesis is true, there were resets of non-human advanced civilizations which went extinct after some number of resets in the very distant past of ancient earth.

  14. #294
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    Originally Posted by monet View Post
    Eventually they get reset back to square one losing all information, but the cycle repeats itself.
    And of course, if the Silurian hypothesis is true, there were resets of non-human advanced civilizations which went extinct after some number of resets in the very distant past of ancient earth.
    If and when humanity dies out how long do you think our last evidence of existence will be?
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  15. #295
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/clima...e-southern-us/ T

    his is a straight-forward extrapolation of an empirical observation. Houses will be flooded before mortgage paid off.

    Ok, so you don't live on the coast but many many millions do and they're likely going to need to relocate and in a world where resources become increasingly expensive.

    HMMMM. And this is only an American perspective.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  16. #296
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    Originally Posted by monet View Post
    Eventually they get reset back to square one losing all information, but the cycle repeats itself.
    And of course, if the Silurian hypothesis is true, there were resets of non-human advanced civilizations which went extinct after some number of resets in the very distant past of ancient earth.
    If and when humanity dies out how long do you think our last evidence of existence will be?
    It depends on the technological sophistication of our non-human successors at their zenith assuming this hypothesis is true. When the sun uses up all of its hydrogen fuel, it will turn into a red giant and probably consume the earth. There will be no evidence of mankind after that since the earth will either be gone or burnt to a crisp if it still exists. Mars will have some rovers on it and the Voyager probes may still exist, along with other human probes but this is beyond the scope of terrestrial successors. Eventually the heat death of the universe will occur due to its unending and ever accelerating expansion and all life in the universe will cease to exist. Other universes will bubble into existence and then new questions will be asked and answered in forums including responses identical to this one.

  17. #297
    .


    the link provides an alternative, less pessimistic view of climate change


    https://www.heritage.org/environment...global-warming


    .
    please don't feed the trolls

  18. #298
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    And of course, if the Silurian hypothesis is true, there were resets of non-human advanced civilizations which went extinct after some number of resets in the very distant past of ancient earth.
    If and when humanity dies out how long do you think our last evidence of existence will be?
    It depends on the technological sophistication of our non-human successors at their zenith assuming this hypothesis is true. When the sun uses up all of its hydrogen fuel, it will turn into a red giant and probably consume the earth. There will be no evidence of mankind after that since the earth will either be gone or burnt to a crisp if it still exists. Mars will have some rovers on it and the Voyager probes may still exist, along with other human probes but this is beyond the scope of terrestrial successors. Eventually the heat death of the universe will occur due to its unending and ever accelerating expansion and all life in the universe will cease to exist. Other universes will bubble into existence and then new questions will be asked and answered in forums including responses identical to this one.
    And also don’t forget that Leave it to Beaver episodes that were broadcast in the 50s will drift out through space at light speed until the universe ends so that will also be evidence of humanities existence.

  19. #299
    Originally Posted by DGenBen View Post
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post

    If and when humanity dies out how long do you think our last evidence of existence will be?
    It depends on the technological sophistication of our non-human successors at their zenith assuming this hypothesis is true. When the sun uses up all of its hydrogen fuel, it will turn into a red giant and probably consume the earth. There will be no evidence of mankind after that since the earth will either be gone or burnt to a crisp if it still exists. Mars will have some rovers on it and the Voyager probes may still exist, along with other human probes but this is beyond the scope of terrestrial successors. Eventually the heat death of the universe will occur due to its unending and ever accelerating expansion and all life in the universe will cease to exist. Other universes will bubble into existence and then new questions will be asked and answered in forums including responses identical to this one.
    And also don’t forget that Leave it to Beaver episodes that were broadcast in the 50s will drift out through space at light speed until the universe ends so that will also be evidence of humanities existence.
    lol. Don't forget Gilligan's Island which IMO is far more important.

    Tableplay -
    I'd never heard of the Silurian hypothese. Do the proponents of this believe that it may have happened with the Sun at its (roughly) current stage?
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  20. #300
    Originally Posted by Half Smoke View Post
    .


    the link provides an alternative, less pessimistic view of climate change


    https://www.heritage.org/environment...global-warming


    .
    Except this is a political take and has nothing to do with a scientific take. Those arguments are basically "everything isn't known - therefore we shouldn't do much".

    Any scientific phenomena that will intercede on people's lives has someone taking a contrarian view. Almost always conservative/right-wing voices. At some point you just sorta learn to ignore that stuff.

    I was curious why this "analyst" who wrote this doesn't have any credentials listed except her bestowed title. So I go to her linkedin to see if she has accomplished anything that should make her worthy of listening to.

    This is the sum of her education - A bachelor's in history from "Grove City College".

    Lots of people say - hey! These scientists are doing it for the grant money - just follow the money! THat is a standard fall back argument, but let me ask you this. Who has more job skills - a guy who got a PhD from a respectable institution (selective and difficult) or a woman who puts Excel and Word as job skills on her linkedin?

    Anyway, lets pick apart her article's takeaways because it sure ain't worth reading.

    Climate trends don’t support rapid economy-altering responses, and areas of uncertainty in our scientific understanding caution for humility in policymaking -
    Simply not true. I'm not sure what humility means exactly but we're really not doing that much to begin with and 100% we should be skeptical. All this greenwashing is bullshit at best and will slow the warming rate to some extent but the cost of power is going to have to go way up.


    Too many politicians have assumed the answers and ignored nuance. The reality is, there is considerable uncertainty.
    There will always be uncertainty when predicting the weather. It is complicated enough just predicting weather trends a few days out. This statement means so little.

    As we continue to improve our scientific understanding of climate, skepticism about climate policy is merited.
    To me, she seems to be saying roughly the same thing as her other points. LOL.

    My takeaway -
    You can always find stuff like this on the internet.

    I've continually posted direct observations of things happening around the globe. Perhaps the frequency of these events hasn't change and it is just our perspective however realize that our media has no incentive to report on this stuff. People don't want to read it. I post empirical observations SPECIFICALLY because the focus of this woman's 3 takeaways - "uncertainty". By the time we are certain it'll be far too late. I think it is possible but the chance are near 0 given the behavior of the typical human.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Unders in the NBA -- a recent trend
    By Dan Druff in forum Sports & Sportsbetting
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-11-2021, 07:52 PM
  2. Eliot and Don Feud
    By Midwest Player in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 136
    Last Post: 10-20-2020, 04:36 PM
  3. Another GWAE Interview
    By mickeycrimm in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 04-30-2019, 02:46 PM
  4. Interview with an AP
    By Guy Incognito in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 09-04-2018, 04:24 PM
  5. Regarding recent trolling threads/messages here
    By Dan Druff in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-10-2018, 11:47 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •