Recent interview with Eliot Jacobson

[accountinquestion]

Grab some popcorn for apocoporn. We used to have ruin-porn. Then we got your basic Ukrainian war porn but this is an all new fresh genre.

People dying of heat stroke and such isn't really that interesting. Starving. blah blah who cares it is all about the historical floods.



4 km tunnels filled with water and cars. Happened within minutes.A huge graveyard of hte cars they pull out. Censoring the flowers people bring. Never in the history of man has there been anything like wtf is going on there. It is on so many levels of fucked. The level of spying and control seems unlikely to occur again with humankind. Things going to go to the shitter too much first.

Anyway, these 2 guys are one of my favorite youtubers. Watch enough of these and you get a good idea of how awful China is.


China has to be the most fascinating of all countries. It seems the most foreign to the West given how their government works and the high tech fascist stuff going on plus the insane amount of waste and corruption. (oops sorry if I offended anyone by using F word.. sensitive subject) One of these guy's shows back when they were in China - they snuck around on their motorcycles and would find these cities with a dozen or more skyscrapers just empty. Buildings with a fancy facade that were total and utter garbage underneath. Making cooking oil out of the gutter and repackaging it and selling it.... sounds absurd but they covered it recently. Fascinating stuff.

[accountinquestion]

Meh only the first hour is worth watching but definitely worth watching.

Here is the spit/gutter episode. Holy fuck that is nasty. I have no desire to visit that country even if it wasn't so anti-US these days.

[accountinquestion]

Meh only the first hour is worth watching but definitely worth watching.

Here is the spit/gutter episode. Holy fuck that is nasty. I have no desire to visit that country even if it wasn't so anti-US these days.

oops left out the URL.

"If you have visited or lived in china - YOU have used gutter oil". Lol so glad to only visit via Youtube. Such a nasty concept. I'm sure it'll only get worse given the decline of civilization occuring now and for foreseeable future.

[mickeycrimm]

Climate alarmists making big bucks:

[Rob.Singer]

Meh only the first hour is worth watching but definitely worth watching.

Here is the spit/gutter episode. Holy fuck that is nasty. I have no desire to visit that country even if it wasn't so anti-US these days.

oops left out the URL.

"If you have visited or lived in china - YOU have used gutter oil". Lol so glad to only visit via Youtube. Such a nasty concept. I'm sure it'll only get worse given the decline of civilization occuring now and for foreseeable future.

And if you have been to China and have eaten at any of the smaller local restaurants or food street shacks, you have eaten cat and dog.

[accountinquestion]

Climate alarmists making big bucks:

"big bucks" meaning tiny fraction of an oil company CEO who funds denialism ?

What do you think the salaries of the typical research/academic are relative to the CEO of a public oil company ?

Serious question.

[mickeycrimm]

Climate alarmists making big bucks:

"big bucks" meaning tiny fraction of an oil company CEO who funds denialism ?

What do you think the salaries of the typical research/academic are relative to the CEO of a public oil company ?

Serious question.

Research/Academics are a dime a dozen. There are multi-thousands of them. CEO of a major oil company is a pretty rare position. Not many of them on the planet. So not a valid comparison. Now, if there were multi thousands of oil company CEO's you might be on to something.

You made no comments about Judith Curry's assertions. She believes that climate change is a problem but not near to the level the alarmists scream about. Is she also a denialist in your eyes?

[accountinquestion]

Climate alarmists making big bucks:

"big bucks" meaning tiny fraction of an oil company CEO who funds denialism ?

What do you think the salaries of the typical research/academic are relative to the CEO of a public oil company ?

Serious question.

Research/Academics are a dime a dozen. There are multi-thousands of them. CEO of a major oil company is a pretty rare position. Not many of them on the planet. So not a valid comparison. Now, if there were multi thousands of oil company CEO's you might be on to something.

You made no comments about Judith Curry's assertions. She believes that climate change is a problem but not near to the level the alarmists scream about. Is she also a denialist in your eyes?

Huh? CEOs get in their position for far different reasons. It isn't necessarily their expertise. The talk was of money and incentives. I'm not sure your point though. There aren't near enough public oil companies to have many CEOs. They are not going through a particularly rigorous vetting process but I suppose a lot of academics aren't that different. A lot of it is politics and being at the right place and right time but that isn't the case with the best researchers. They do ground breaking stuff that advances humanity. They're not giving handjobs under the corporate meeting table hoping to be promoted in the future to pad their salary with an extra 0.

Researchers didn't get into their jobs to make $$. We've talked about this before. Not everyone has a value system based on cash. Some people value learning and truth. These people would never become CEOs in the first place. Only the guys chasing the "big bucks".

Regardless, we're talking about the incentives of the CEO to fund all this denialism crap amongst the simps. You are the one who talked about "big bucks' funding this. But the bucks just aren't near as big on the researcher's side.

Researchers are not exactly a dime a dozen. Not the legitimate ones you can trust. Sure we could each call ourselves researchers because we watch youtube videos but that doesn't count.

You know anything about Hawaii? Or wait we want to talk about the warm waters in Florida? East or West my man. What about so many other countries? Look around or watch a handful of youtube channels desperately cling to nonsense in their hope to get clicks.

July hottest month on record but hey it is Summer so it ain't going to be January that beats the records! Of course it'd be July. right?! You see this level of reasoning so often. Many times in this thread alone.

This shit is done with bro. Write humanity OFF.

I'm actually moving most of my $$ into ETFs based on slowing/mitigating climate change effects. Not sure when to enter the stock market though. That is beyond me.

I believe I watched some of this Judith woman. Anyone can make a point and it may seem logical in a vacuum but we don't live in a vacuum. It is all most unfortunate. I really really wish I was wrong. I like nature. I like eating a variety of food.

I don't like forests being ravaged across the globe. You can't blame it on Democrats, buddy. There are pretty much infinite things I don't like about this but nothing I can do.

[tableplay]

[accountinquestion]

Here is a new one.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/mark...08e61b4e&ei=12

[mickeycrimm]

Here is a new one.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/mark...08e61b4e&ei=12

Panama has probably had 50 draughts in the past 500 years. Look at California. Their latest draught was all blamed on climate change by the alarmists. But a dozen draughts have been recorded in Cali in the past 200 years.

[accountinquestion]

Here is a new one.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/mark...08e61b4e&ei=12

Panama has probably had 50 draughts in the past 500 years. Look at California. Their latest draught was all blamed on climate change by the alarmists. But a dozen draughts have been recorded in Cali in the past 200 years.

Sure there have always been droughts but it is the frequency and magnitude that are the concern.

I'm not sure what you are suggesting here. That it can only be climate change if we never leave droughts and it is the new normal? Because as long as there are "droughts" then well that is all it is because droughts have existed in the past?

Basically things have to by hyper-fucked before you'll start believing. Yea, you change your mind a lot.

Doesn't really matter. It is all inevitable at this point. Not that Americans could have prevented it on their own but they could have helped lead the way. But no one wants to give up anything. Not even "Christans" who like to see themselves as superior. They'll sit around screaming about abortion but when it comes to fucking their own kids. No problemo !

And thats the truth.

[mickeycrimm]

Here is a new one.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/mark...08e61b4e&ei=12

Panama has probably had 50 draughts in the past 500 years. Look at California. Their latest draught was all blamed on climate change by the alarmists. But a dozen draughts have been recorded in Cali in the past 200 years.

Sure there have always been droughts but it is the frequency and magnitude that are the concern.

I'm not sure what you are suggesting here. That it can only be climate change if we never leave droughts and it is the new normal? Because as long as there are "droughts" then well that is all it is because droughts have existed in the past?

Basically things have to by hyper-fucked before you'll start believing. Yea, you change your mind a lot.

Doesn't really matter. It is all inevitable at this point. Not that Americans could have prevented it on their own but they could have helped lead the way. But no one wants to give up anything. Not even "Christans" who like to see themselves as superior. They'll sit around screaming about abortion but when it comes to fucking their own kids. No problemo !

And thats the truth.

The frequency and magnitude is no worse today than it was in the past. Give it up. Climate alarmists blame every weather event on climate change. STFU! Climate alarmists told us climate change caused more hurricanes. That got debunked. You guys are just full of it.

[accountinquestion]

Panama has probably had 50 draughts in the past 500 years. Look at California. Their latest draught was all blamed on climate change by the alarmists. But a dozen draughts have been recorded in Cali in the past 200 years.

Sure there have always been droughts but it is the frequency and magnitude that are the concern.

I'm not sure what you are suggesting here. That it can only be climate change if we never leave droughts and it is the new normal? Because as long as there are "droughts" then well that is all it is because droughts have existed in the past?

Basically things have to by hyper-fucked before you'll start believing. Yea, you change your mind a lot.

Doesn't really matter. It is all inevitable at this point. Not that Americans could have prevented it on their own but they could have helped lead the way. But no one wants to give up anything. Not even "Christans" who like to see themselves as superior. They'll sit around screaming about abortion but when it comes to fucking their own kids. No problemo !

And thats the truth.

The frequency and magnitude is no worse today than it was in the past. Give it up. Climate alarmists blame every weather event on climate change. STFU! Climate alarmists told us climate change caused more hurricanes. That got debunked. You guys are just full of it.

You're the same guy a couple months ago that said records were not being broken at a higher rate. When I come across a good source of all the records being broken I will post it here as a response.

Where I'm from has DEFINITELY had records broken and not just 1 day this Summer sorta deal. Really bad ones. I'm curious how many trees are going to die. Hopefully not many. Last time this happened all the larger ones that relied on creeks and such died. All I can do though is fire mitigation. Will be buying a tractor when I get back to do some work.

Regardless though your point is at least a little true. No one can precisely say how much of the weather anomalies are impacted by climate change. Given all the random variance the cause can't be separated. Maybe we would have had a drought anyway. No one can be very very certain. Yes that is all true.

One thing that is baffling is that you understand variance but it is another universal excuse sort of deal. Maybe you're right maybe not but you guys point out to the weather being nice wherever you are is the like telling us a machine is lucky or it is +EV because you won the first spin.

You were literally mocking the idea of records being broken but seriously.. look the fuck around.

You seem to think that because everything has a possible other explanation then somehow it invalidates the observations and views of many many others.

I'm not taking a shot at you. I'm very impressed by how you are self-educated. The reality though is that many many smart people agree about this stuff and very few disagree. These are not people who spent their life chasing dollars. You say they're the ones going after the "big bucks" but you just ignore the fact that one can say the same about the other side which is DEFINITELY money oriented. You're beyond biased.

You'll go to some hack youtube channel from a person who has likely not accomplished anything until they started pandering. A person with no particular skill or knowledge. Nothing there to suggest that we should listen to them in regards to this. From their view - All at once they don't even have to work if they get their clicks! But nah, they're not chasing the bucks.

It is the guys who who spent all their younger life studying and learning and improving themselves in that regard and not chasing money. THEY are the ones chasing the "big bucks".

Wonder if you could ever change your mind about you not changing your mind?!?!

[Gottlob1]

It is the guys who who spent all their younger life studying and learning and improving themselves in that regard and not chasing money. THEY are the ones chasing the "big bucks".

Is it inconceivable that some of us chase what's enough of each? I guess not, given your latest "signature line".

VCT - the finest of all sites with only the finest gamblers one will ever encounter. Book it.

The reason that those persons were such jokes, went dark, is that they went for both, and, so, failed miserably.



Well, on second thought, it's a whole other sort and degree of joke even when you go for, and garner, either. Just look at the fruitcakes that MrV, and Blackhole turned out to be. And, the MDawg. Ha.

[Gottlob1]

Well, on second thought, it's a whole other sort and degree of joke even when you go for, and garner, either. Just look at the fruitcakes that MrV, and Blackhole turned out to be. And, the MDawg. Ha.

Speaking of Blackhole, check out the latest action over at GF's. Old Red must have a target painted on him. Ha.

Let me be honest here Redietz. I do not give a fuck about you or your Gangster Chronicles. I do not give a fuck about George Anastasia, who he is, or his fucking contracts.

I do not give a fuck about your personal documented history or your bio. You got a better chance of winning the Mega Bucks lotto then me sending you anything, especially how to reach me.

As far as I am concerned, you are a hard gambler and always have been. I do not give a fuck if you have a million dollars or twenty bucks to your name and have trouble paying a $500.00 tax lean.

You obviously are just another two-faced, back-stabbing degenerate gambler, who would do anything for your next bet, and would say anything, be it the truth or a lie that would help you get your next bet.

The only thing I will ask nicely for you to do is “go fuck yourself.”

I guess that the Hole lives in one of those gated communities that they bring you to, blindfolded.

That would be me -- the classic degenerate. That would explain why 85% of my annual betting volume is college football, a 12-week endeavor.

It's okay, blackhole. I understand. It is harsh when Person A is behind lifetime, by quite a few dollars, and Person B is ahead lifetime, by quite a few dollars. I don't disagree with Person A calling Person B a "degenerate."

The question, the kicker if you will, is if Person B is a degenerate, what does that make Person A?

The answer, of course, is a "recreational gambler."

I'm getting a new phone with a much better camera next week. I'll try to post that Who's Who in Sports Gambling bio here and give blackhole a shout out for the idea.

And blackhole, why don't you list all the lies I've told during my 20 years of posting? Don't be shy. We lying degenerates need to be made to own up to our deficiencies. So one day, if we're lucky, we can be recreational gamblers, too.

Now there's another soy boy response. I would have told the Hole to go jump in one. Ha.

[mcap]

Speaking of Blackhole, check out the latest action over at GF's. Old Red must have a target painted on him. Ha.



I guess that the Hole lives in one of those gated communities that they bring you to, blindfolded.

That would be me -- the classic degenerate. That would explain why 85% of my annual betting volume is college football, a 12-week endeavor.

It's okay, blackhole. I understand. It is harsh when Person A is behind lifetime, by quite a few dollars, and Person B is ahead lifetime, by quite a few dollars. I don't disagree with Person A calling Person B a "degenerate."

The question, the kicker if you will, is if Person B is a degenerate, what does that make Person A?

The answer, of course, is a "recreational gambler."

I'm getting a new phone with a much better camera next week. I'll try to post that Who's Who in Sports Gambling bio here and give blackhole a shout out for the idea.

And blackhole, why don't you list all the lies I've told during my 20 years of posting? Don't be shy. We lying degenerates need to be made to own up to our deficiencies. So one day, if we're lucky, we can be recreational gamblers, too.

Now there's another soy boy response. I would have told the Hole to go jump in one. Ha.

Maybe you should crawl back into the Hole you came from Gottlob. Ha!

[Gottlob1]

Maybe you should crawl back into the Hole you came from Gottlob. Ha!

---> Church of St Mary Magdalene, Wookey Hole.

https://anagram-solver.net/Maybe%20y...0?partial=true


Somebody got up on the wrong side. Ha.

The Church of St Mary Magdalene is a Church of England church in Wookey Hole, Somerset, England, dedicated to Jesus' companion Mary Magdalene. The church, which was designed by Benjamin Ferrey and his son, was built in 1873-74 and has been a Grade II listed building since 2004.

Gee, the image number is 5162 = (5172 - 10) ---> 1/7152, my randomly assigned, user-numeral on the gematria forums.

[mcap]

93. For your inverted 36. 3 6’s. 1000%

[tableplay]

I guess that the Hole lives in one of those gated communities that they bring you to, blindfolded.

And usually such communities have pentagrams inscribed in the gates and gargoyles mounted on top of the gates.