Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 146

Thread: The Unofficial Alan is a Fucktard thread

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Since one can’t say anything negative at the place he posts I figured this would be a good place to reply since he calls this place a cesspool.

    Feel free to comment on his stupidity and claims here…or don’t.


    Anyways to start now he is using a Tax Relief company, which most of us understand are pure scams and always have been. And somehow Alan is now in need of one, imagine that.

    I don’t trust the IRS either but if one ends up in a audit situation you pay a good attorney that specializes in tax law. You don’t call someone who advertises free services on satellite radio for a percentage of what they “save” you. Who falls for this shit? Alan, of course.

    Here is some reviews and warnings of the places he is currently recommending at that other forum where he posts and gets laughed at for his life.

    https://law.alaska.gov/press/consume.../0810-tax.html

    https://www.ag.state.mn.us/consumer/...eliefscams.asp

    https://www.debt.com/news/how-to-tel...ce-and-a-scam/



    And if he means he is working “with” them as an employee, why the hell is a 70 year old man taking a job. He must be bored or broke, I’ll let you guess.

    Either way, it’s appropriate for what we know of his and his career after being a “reporter”.

  2. #2
    Hard to understand why he'd go a cesspool to receive sympathy and grieve over his ex-wife dying.

    Strange times.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  3. #3
    Alan may be a fucktard, but he's still the 2nd biggest legend in VCT history

  4. #4
    In calling this forum a cesspool (which I don't argue ) I just find it funny that Alan forgets to mention that he started this forum and began it on its path to cesspool-ism.

    Alan also was arguing that anonymous forums shouldn't be anonymous. THAT is what they are....and for a reason. And gambling forums even more of a reason for certain players.

    I realize not being an AP, Alan and some others just don't understand at all the need for AP's to be anonymous if they do decide to post. These goofballs like Alan don't have an entire industry, trying to stop them from playing. Really two industries counting the database/consulting industry.

    I think the only reason Alan uses his real name, is because he always thought of and still does think of himself as a celebrity. I can't speak for any of you, but I never heard of Alan Mendelson until I got to this forum. And now that I know who he is (and was), I just don't consider former field news reporters as celebrities. And I certainly don't consider, infomercial pitchmen celebrities. But that is just me.

    One other thing. People have been able to look into Rob Singer if they want to and discover that his finances and records just don't match his claims, because his real name is known. You can also look into Alan Mendelson if you want to. And what financial info there is and hints of his current financial situation are not very flattering compared to 15-20 years ago. I am sure this surprises no one and everyone understands why and where most of that went. But that is why people don't and use their real names and identities.

    And you know what? It is exactly why the Mdog person doesn't use a real name. Unlike AP's who wish to remain unknown to the casinos, Mdog wants to remain unknown to the members of various forums, because if everyone looked into him, and what he really wins (and you can do that with a real name and identity), his gig would have been up 2 years ago.
    Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".

  5. #5
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Feel free to comment on his stupidity and claims here…or don’t.
    18 yo's in a row...'nuf said.

    I have to group him with Rob and douchedawg as being an attention whore; not to the same decree as to the other two, but he's up there on the pantheon nonetheless.

    He and I have knocked heads for decades on various forums, but I kind of "like" the guy; he has an opinion on everything and many are from far left field.

    That in part is what drives these forums, i.e. people making claims that most dispute.

    It works, sort of, for Alan and worked quite well for Rob, but the prominent Badge of Bullshit festooned on douchedawg has been an epic fail.
    What, Me Worry?

  6. #6
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post

    18 yo's in a row...'nuf said.

    I have to group him with Rob and douchedawg as being an attention whore; not to the same decree as to the other two, but he's up there on the pantheon nonetheless.
    Attention whore? Can't you say we ALL are to some degree?

    I certainly don't put Alan anywhere near the other two trolls\scammers mentioned.

    I have never found a single claim of Alan's regarding his own gambling to be anything I would question, from $100k royals hit, down to his dwindling mailer offers for his lower limit play now. The only gambling related thing he has said that I question is of course the 18 y.o.s in a row, and I am convinced there is selective memory at play there. That is honesty what he thinks he saw. Remember Alan doesn't claim to have made one cent off of that.

    Now I have labeled Alan as dishonest (shyster) in that he intentionally says things he absolutely knows is not true to back a position he has or has taken. But his gambling claims, I just have seen nothing that I even slightly have thought can't be.
    Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".

  7. #7
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Attention whore? Can't you say we ALL are to some degree? I certainly don't put Alan anywhere near the other two trolls\scammers mentioned.
    Nor do I.

    But here's the thing: I have a much longer history with Alan than you do, and I clearly remember how he made many ridiculous posts seemingly just for attention.

    But yeah, there's a dollop of attention whore in all prolific forum posters.
    What, Me Worry?

  8. #8
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Attention whore? Can't you say we ALL are to some degree?
    No. Most of us are here for entertainment. Whether we entertain others or annoy them for our own entertainment - that is why we're here.

    Oh and sometimes we learn things.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  9. #9
    I share Alan's preference that forums, unless specific topical forums (which this is not), should be non-anonymous.

    This isn't China. There's no pressing need, outside of paranoia or culture-induced fear, to worry about putting your actual name with your words. This country got along fine with things called white pages and phone books, featuring everyone's names and addresses. Fifty years ago, anonymous communication was the province of scaredy cats and damaged minds. Things have not improved via anonymity.

    This culture of anyone can say anything anonymously online with no regard for "they know where you live" contributes to the juvenification of Americans. Mommy, daddy, and anonymity allow you to spew whatever comes to mind, regardless of truth value or consequences. Civility goes out the window. Responsibility for your words goes out the window.

    There's a reason people put their actual names on academic papers, on military reports, on police reports, on engineering analyses. People have to take responsibility for their reporting, for their opinions, for their expertise (real or not). Nobody built a bridge based on an anonymous engineer's reportage.

    In my opinion, in the grand scheme of things, the necessity of anonymity for APs counts for very little against the enormous lack of responsibility and accountability anonymity provides and the detrimental effects anonymity has had on the culture in general. This is where Alan and I see eye to eye.

  10. #10
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    I share Alan's preference that forums, unless specific topical forums (which this is not), should be non-anonymous.

    This isn't China. There's no pressing need, outside of paranoia or culture-induced fear, to worry about putting your actual name with your words.
    I beg to differ. I have had someone from these forums show up at my home trying to get past security to find me. And this after he announced right here on this forum that he intended to do just that. And there have been several other members (or maybe a variation of one member) that have publicly posted on two other forums, WoV and one of the blackjack forums, asking members for information on me and how they can find me and even pictures of me. You don't have to take my word on these things, they happened right on public forums.

    And of course more recently, within the last year, someone on these forums, posted that he had hired someone to find me and then doxed and sent information to the casinos. And this little incident will probably cost me 50k by the time the year is though having to have laid low for a period.

    So don't talk to me about paranoia, until you have had someone come find you, snap some pictures and distribute them to the casinos sportsbooks here in Vegas disrupting what you do to make a living.


    If you want forums to be a place where no one can participate unless they are willing to sign their real name, well, there will be no AP's on any gambling forum. There aren't many now. Most won't go near a public forum and think those of us that do are idiots.

    Let's have a gambling forum, but make it so no real professional player will participate. Does THAT really make sense to you?
    Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".

  11. #11
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    I share Alan's preference that forums, unless specific topical forums (which this is not), should be non-anonymous.

    This isn't China. There's no pressing need, outside of paranoia or culture-induced fear, to worry about putting your actual name with your words. This country got along fine with things called white pages and phone books, featuring everyone's names and addresses. Fifty years ago, anonymous communication was the province of scaredy cats and damaged minds. Things have not improved via anonymity.

    This culture of anyone can say anything anonymously online with no regard for "they know where you live" contributes to the juvenification of Americans. Mommy, daddy, and anonymity allow you to spew whatever comes to mind, regardless of truth value or consequences. Civility goes out the window. Responsibility for your words goes out the window.

    There's a reason people put their actual names on academic papers, on military reports, on police reports, on engineering analyses. People have to take responsibility for their reporting, for their opinions, for their expertise (real or not). Nobody built a bridge based on an anonymous engineer's reportage.

    In my opinion, in the grand scheme of things, the necessity of anonymity for APs counts for very little against the enormous lack of responsibility and accountability anonymity provides and the detrimental effects anonymity has had on the culture in general. This is where Alan and I see eye to eye.
    Offucking course you do, because it benefits you(and Alan). It's actually abnormal for someone to use their real name on a forum. As someone pointed out already, your real name has value, AND that's exactly why you guys have chosen to use it... because the benefits to you outweigh the risks. It's about all self-promotion.

    There are some vindictive crazy nutjobs out there, there are people looking to harass and stalk people. There are people looking to rob people who might have money. I think KJ has been a victim of all 3 and he doesn't even use his real name, I can only just imagine if he did.

    I choose not to use my real name online since it's fairly unique and I'm an advantage player. I have gone out of my way to make myself seem like a ploppy at locations that haven't been figured out I'm an advantage player, there are also new casinos popping up all the time, and many casinos I haven't yet been to. The last thing advantage players need is for the casinos to do a simple google search and make it official where one is admitting to it. Advantage players oftentimes play together at casinos for example a table game where they would rather the pit know as little about them as possible. I would much rather just engrain their forum name in my head or I'll fuck up and use their real name at some point or people at a gathering where they don't want their real name used.

    Also, I frequently play online, oftentimes the terms and conditions have rules against advantage play.

    So don't go getting up on your high horse because you oddly and selfishly use your real name online.

    Wait a minute, that's not even your real name.

  12. #12
    redietz, I am trying to think who would and wouldn't be here if we were required to use real names.

    Mickeycrimm wouldn't be here, Maxpen, JBJB, Monet, accountinquestion, Axelwolf, tableplay, desertrunner, and many more....none of them would be here.

    You would because you are ok with using your name, and Alan (when he posts here), and tasha, and Dan Druff.
    Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".

  13. #13
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    redietz, I am trying to think who would and wouldn't be here if we were required to use real names.

    Mickeycrimm wouldn't be here, Maxpen, JBJB, Monet, accountinquestion, Axelwolf, tableplay, desertrunner, and many more....none of them would be here.

    You would because you are ok with using your name, and Alan (when he posts here), and tasha, and Dan Druff.
    UNKOOL wrong again. "Desertrunner" with his whopping 200 posts vs his 3000 over at PFA, is not even an AP. The others have made bank. Account would be put in the fringe category.

  14. #14
    Originally Posted by Ozzy View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    redietz, I am trying to think who would and wouldn't be here if we were required to use real names.

    Mickeycrimm wouldn't be here, Maxpen, JBJB, Monet, accountinquestion, Axelwolf, tableplay, desertrunner, and many more....none of them would be here.

    You would because you are ok with using your name, and Alan (when he posts here), and tasha, and Dan Druff.
    UNKOOL wrong again. "Desertrunner" with his whopping 200 posts vs his 3000 over at PFA, is not even an AP. The others have made bank. Account would be put in the fringe category.
    Ozzy, I guess YOU are the authority on who is and isn't an AP and has made "bank". I go by who I have seen contribute anything that would lead me to believe they know what they are talking about and are an advantage player, and that is why YOU weren't on my list. I have never seen you contribute anything that would lead me to beleive you are anything but a troll, and troll loving agitator.
    Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".

  15. #15
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Ozzy View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    redietz, I am trying to think who would and wouldn't be here if we were required to use real names.

    Mickeycrimm wouldn't be here, Maxpen, JBJB, Monet, accountinquestion, Axelwolf, tableplay, desertrunner, and many more....none of them would be here.

    You would because you are ok with using your name, and Alan (when he posts here), and tasha, and Dan Druff.
    UNKOOL wrong again. "Desertrunner" with his whopping 200 posts vs his 3000 over at PFA, is not even an AP. The others have made bank. Account would be put in the fringe category.
    Ozzy, I guess YOU are the authority on who is and isn't an AP and has made "bank". I go by who I have seen contribute anything that would lead me to believe they know what they are talking about and are an advantage player, and that is why YOU weren't on my list. I have never seen you contribute anything that would lead me to beleive you are anything but a troll, and troll loving agitator.
    Once again proving that you are horrendous at reading the playing field. Just because I'm not as vocal as attention whores such as yourself, or others that want to prove they are elite, I could care less, about the recognition. Insecure little wimps like yourself need that to feel warranted. I've written enough over the years, to adequately display that I know a thing or two. The fact you fail to recognize that, shows your incompetence at reading forum personalities. I come here mostly for a laugh and post on occasion to try and lighten things up or shine a light on bullshit. I don't whine like a fairy and have my panties in a bunch, like a repetitive whining UNKOOL poster.

  16. #16
    Originally Posted by Ozzy View Post
    I've written enough over the years, to adequately display that I know a thing or two.
    Maybe you are an AP and maybe you did write enough over the years to adequately display that. I haven't seen it. NOW, it appears all you do is troll and hate and show what a homophobic bigot and nasty person you are, as evident by the rest of your post. Would it kill you to not be a complete asshole all the time?
    Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".

  17. #17
    Sorry RED, I’m with KJ and V on the anonymous stuff. Too many crazies with nothing to lose who disagreed with my comments over the years who have posted my personal information out there. Would anyone actually show up in my gated community to rob me? I doubt it but there are crazies who can try to use the information of us who have assets to try and use it to open accounts and other notorious things.

    Most everyone I’ve either talked to on here enough or “trust” knows my name and personal history. If that wasn’t wise, it’s on me. But I see no reason why to put it out there in most cases. And like everyone else here, I’m not ready to defend myself in court for shooting some fuck who showed up at my door.

    But back on track, I agree with V that much of the shit Alan says is to get a reaction because if he really believes it I feel worse for him than I already do. And I’m not exactly a sympathetic individual. I put my feelings toward Alan right up there with V’s thoughts on the homeless bums at the intersection.

    Semi funny Alan story. I knew of the guy from the forums but about a decade ago I was staying in Anaheim on a CA trip and came home late after hitting some breweries. Couldn’t sleep and sometime overnight trying to find something to watch I found his Best Buys show. Was a bunch of shitty carpet cleaning services, discount Asian designer clothing outlets and such. It was actually sad watching this guy “report” on these places like a legitimate reporter. Even my drunken ass had to feel bad for him at that point. The years of dealing with him afterwards made it all make sense.

  18. #18
    No, I'm not in need of www.taxreliefinfo.org but I am writing articles for their website and handling their advertising and marketing. I have a 15 year long relationship with this company doing marketing and advertising for them. I invite you to check their records and history with the BBB or any organization of your choice.

    Just because I'm 70 years old doesn't mean I drop my clients like a hot potato or a burnt pizza pie.

  19. #19
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    No, I'm not in need of www.taxreliefinfo.org but I am writing articles for their website and handling their advertising and marketing. I have a 15 year long relationship with this company doing marketing and advertising for them. I invite you to check their records and history with the BBB or any organization of your choice.

    Just because I'm 70 years old doesn't mean I drop my clients like a hot potato or a burnt pizza pie.
    15 years with them? So who is behind the site? They created this new “taxreliefinfo.org” website just 2 months ago. The first story on the site from you is on June 23rd, which is a week after theycreated it.

    https://lookup.icann.org/en/lookup

    Appears to be an Arizona corporation behind it. What other businesses are they in that you worked with them on in the past? What are they selling and who are they working with in the tax relief industry?

    And remember Alan, you are the one that started this by shilling for them and drawing attention to the company and website that are very (intentionally?) vague.

    Name:  ABA110BB-5011-42FB-B50C-8426DE5B092C.jpg
Views: 304
Size:  34.0 KB

  20. #20
    As I suspected this site is a clearinghouse to find potential customers for Tax Relief firms. It has a form to get your personal information and then you get this screen.

    Name:  885CBFE9-A457-45D9-958C-F7A2799317FE.jpg
Views: 288
Size:  21.5 KB

    Again the question is what tax relief firms is this site selling the information of potential customers to? This is the only way to evaluate the credibility of these firms in an industry well known for scams and fraud to the point state governments and the IRS themselves warn taxpayers about them.

    Wouldn’t a good reporter put all the details out there for any potential customers to review? After all, you Alan are the one promoting this very vague website online.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The WoV Thread
    By mickeycrimm in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 10012
    Last Post: 03-24-2024, 11:31 AM
  2. The Genealogy Thread
    By mickeycrimm in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 115
    Last Post: 04-27-2018, 06:29 AM
  3. Closed Thread
    By coach belly in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-30-2017, 08:29 PM
  4. Sportsbetting ONLY thread
    By LoneStarHorse in forum Sports & Sportsbetting
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 02-05-2016, 04:48 PM
  5. The Alan's Motives Thread
    By redietz in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 107
    Last Post: 08-29-2012, 05:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •