Is this book real or fiction???
If this is real, I suggest you read it now before it gets taken down.
I find it amazing what they do that nobody knows about with our tax dollars.
Human Brain Project since the early 90s you say, eh!?
Future Strategic Issues/Warfare [circa 2025] by NASA
https://archive.org/details/FutureSt...e/n19/mode/2up
Well this bullet point from the slide you linked to: "GENERATES new ideas/concepts via starving a trained neural net of meaningful inputs, forcing it to "dream"/"cavitate," create new concepts, etc. An attendant neural net used to capture/record/evaluate and report on these "writings." is nonsensical.
It's possible it might not be fictional, but I'm very surprised that a NASA scientist doesn't know how a neural network works. A neural network is just a highly complex mathematical model - it can't be starved of inputs or made to dream by starving it. If you provide it with garbage inputs (explanatory variables) or give it less variables than the model requires (causing it to impute the values for the missing variables if it is coded to impute missing inputs), it will just have a garbage output(s) (response variable(s)).
It's probably a hoax or some work of fiction with sprinkles of truth.
I know for a fact that our government does this secret shit with our money all the time.
The so called "book" was worth a mention so that smarter people like you could evaluate it better, thanks for taking the time.
Yes it is a bit absurd to suggest a neural network with some of the inputs nulled out will dream. But a lot of these government grants will suggest s*** like that just to get their funding from whoever is in charge of making these decisions. I would not assume that the writing is b******* based off of that.
It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"
And this response here is a prime example of the mad ravings that get posted when the insane asylum allows a crazed and delusional lunatic on the internet. He writes about the "river got flooded" and the "river dried up" in the same post. Lunacy.
You need to stick to things where maybe people will respect your opinion. On your so called "climate crisis" you make an illiterate assclown of yourself.
"Some river somewhere?" Damn you're stupid. Not just regular stupid either. Stupid to the 11th power.
Do us a favor. The next time you want to argue with yourself do it in the bathroom mirror instead of on the forum.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
First line in this song from 1981 is:
"Preacher mans says it's the end of time
And the Mississippi River she's goin' dry."
That was over 40 years ago Acunt. You think this is the first time the Mississippi River has been down. It ain't. It happened 40 years ago and has happened a hundred times in the last 500 years.
And while you are perishing from being a pussy us country boys will survive.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
I'm only posting facts. I get it. This is why you like Trump. Doesn't matter what bullshit he feeds you, even if it conflicts with reality, you're going to believe it.
I'm not sure where I said both things about a river in one post. It isn't on this page. I'd suggest you show the link otherwise you're redietzing me. I could look myself but if I can't find it all I've done is waste my time responding to nutball.
I'm not arguing with anyone. You're arguing with me. Lol. JFC dude.
I've just posting things that are readily verifiable. If you don't have the intelligence to spot the pattern there is nothing I can do with you directly. I can however keep posting facts of things are happening now. No studies.
My point with the Pakistan (or whatever country it was) wasn't so much that it was flooding there - I was showing how issues between countries is now starting. These things will continue to become worse and go against mitigation efforts and possibly balloon into some sort of wars.
It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"
And did I say you did or didn't do any of the above? lol dude. Calm down. Monet was trying to decide how uhm credible it was and my comment was addressing that.
I don't even see why one would care. It didn't seem conspiratorial.
Well speaking of which.
https://www.defense.gov/News/Speeche...rticle/605617/
It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"
Here's another one.
https://www.science.org/content/arti...rity-challenge
Trump's boy .. wonder what our biggest Trumper will say about this.
It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"
Anyone who thinks that because the slide says something about neuro-networks dreaming that it is likely fake.
I'm not even sure what Monet was concerned about, that the DOD/whomever might want to try to model the human brain as part of some research grant !?! I guess it is the sort of thing conspiracies are born from.
My only real point is it is likely a real slide and it really didn't seem disconcerting at all after I skimmed ~10 pages.
And just to calm any fears - this shit will never happen. The human brain will never be modeled in the way one might think. AI will likely never be particularly robust. It can now spit out a lot of cool text but that text is just some predictive model from taking in a ton of text of the internet.
It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Bump. Here you go, acunt. Your link is about rivers flooding in pakistan. Then your last paragraph is about rivers running out (goinig dry). Fucking bozo.
And your question about people and desalination? You might not know it but all ships make their own fresh water with desalination tanks.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
I see. Yes but I was addressing all the rivers mentioned before in this thread. I wrote in a very confusing manner. Pakistan running out of water won't matter so much for us, but the Mississippi and the Lake Mead river will.
Besides your made up quotes just weren't something I said. You 100% redietzed me.
I never actually said anything about rivers flooding. The article might have something about it, but it was flooding in general AFAIK and the demand for reparations I was referencing.
You're trying way too hard. My trolling must be top-notch for you guys to try this hard. I'm not even saying I'm always right. I can and do communicate rather poorly but still...
Yep, desalination exists but it takes a lot of power. So yes, we can try to rely on that but shrug. Good luck piping water across states at anywhere near the level of water we have now. Those baths and shit going to be extra pricey.
Resources needed for mitigation going to go to shit like this. Not mitigation of future effects, just keeping infrastructure up and going.
Kinda funny. Global warming doesn't exist because some scientists somewhere in the past said we'd have global cooling. Global warming is a joke because it was renamed to climate change. Oh wait it doesn't have universal effects across the globe simultaneously ?!
It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)