kewlJ can we have a Rob Singer update?

[mickeycrimm]

There was no casino nor any $1.5m UX jackpot. Only a crackhead would buy such bullshit!

Pass the crackpipe.

[mickeycrimm]

And you actually believes Rob when he said the casino did not want the fact that he won $1.5M to be known?

Bwa ha ha ha

You know better than that Mickey.

But here's a suggestion: you are a ramblin' gamblin' man who travels a lot; why don't YOU visit or failing that, call, the alleged casino and inquire on your own?

Your first question should be "If a patron hit a $1.5M jackpot, would you want to prevent news of it from getting out?"

Your comments about KJ are a red herring, Mickey: this ain't about him, it's about the veracity and the alleged exploits of Rob Singer.

It's not about the "alleged exploits of Rob Singer." It's about how Singer owns you guys. You can't get him out of your heads. Your every waking hour is spent waiting on him to post.

And you've obviously mistaken me for someone who cares whether Rob hit the jackpot or not. I don't. So you guys do me a favor and quit trying to get me to do shit for you. Do it yourselves.

[kewlJ]

Put a dick in your mouth and Shut the Fuck up Faggot.

You shut the fuck up you fat disgusting pig! Shove some more greasy fast food in you big mouth so you die even sooner. Can you imagine that this complete piece of shit is so fat he probably can't even reach to wipe his own ass. What a fucking waste of life.

[Ozzy]

At least he's not tree fitty !

[monet]

At least he's not tree fitty !

I'm trying though.
Can't seem to get over 260 for some reason.
Sucks.

[MisterV]

And you've obviously mistaken me for someone who cares whether Rob hit the jackpot or not. I don't.

Were that the case, why then did you post that he told you the name of the casino?

Why would he tell you of all people when you don't give a shit, and if you don't care, why not tell those us who are mildly interested in unmasking Rob once again?

[mickeycrimm]

And you've obviously mistaken me for someone who cares whether Rob hit the jackpot or not. I don't.

Were that the case, why then did you post that he told you the name of the casino?

Why would he tell you of all people when you don't give a shit, and if you don't care, why not tell those us who are mildly interested in unmasking Rob once again?

Mildly interested? C'mon, dude. You can do better than that. You, KJ and his crew, are all chomping at the bit to know which casino. You are slobbering all over yourselves. But you won't get it from me. Fuck you idiots.

[redietz]

LOL. I already know what casino it was, also, just like Mickey "The Truth" Crimm. See, two can play at this idiocy.

P.S. MrV, if you're wondering, it was The Tangiers. People say there's no such place, but I have a coin cup proving otherwise.

P.S.S. No, seriously, I know which casino it was. They leaked Rob's win to me. But they also said he blew 1.45 of the 1.5 mil in the last three months. He got great comps, though. Of course, I'm sworn to not give the casino name publicly. They said something like, "We'd be embarrassed he won it. Plus he'd be embarrassed that he lost it back." They said if I didn't believe them, just ask for a copy of his tax return.

I said that I didn't think Mickey would make a wager with me based on Rob's tax return so people would just have to decide who was telling the truth, me or "The Truth."

Double P.S.S. Nobody believes Rob, obviously. Which means nobody believes Mickey. It's a shame when a polyglot like Mickey, winning at machines, poker, and various sports, makes the "Not Likely to be Believed" roster of alleged APs. Damned shame. I hear Mickey still kills it at The Tangiers, however.

[TheGrimReaper]

Double P.S.S.

Had to google that one.

Did you mean: Double P.A.S.S.

A double pass is a trick play in American football. A double pass is a lateral thrown out wide with a second pass then thrown downfield. The play starts with the quarterback throwing an overhand lateral, called a screen pass, to a player split... Wikipedia

Nobody believes Rob, obviously. Which means nobody believes Mickey. It's a shame when a polyglot like Mickey, winning at machines, poker, and various sports, makes the "Not Likely to be Believed" roster of alleged APs.

Some guy who drives from one shithole casino, to the next, in search of quarters people let in slot machines. The open secret to becoming a legend in one's own head. I'd write, mind, but, seriously ... .


P.S. Merry Christmas, Red. Hope you're not offended by that. Ha.

[TheGrimReaper]

At least he's not tree fitty !

I'm trying though. Can't seem to get over 260 for some reason. Sucks.

Your scales are broken?

Scales have a limited weight capacity, with most standard scales having a maximum weight of 300 pounds. However, older models tend to be less accurate for people who weigh over 250 pounds.

[accountinquestion]

LOL. I already know what casino it was, also, just like Mickey "The Truth" Crimm. See, two can play at this idiocy.

P.S. MrV, if you're wondering, it was The Tangiers. People say there's no such place, but I have a coin cup proving otherwise.

P.S.S. No, seriously, I know which casino it was. They leaked Rob's win to me. But they also said he blew 1.45 of the 1.5 mil in the last three months. He got great comps, though. Of course, I'm sworn to not give the casino name publicly. They said something like, "We'd be embarrassed he won it. Plus he'd be embarrassed that he lost it back." They said if I didn't believe them, just ask for a copy of his tax return.

I said that I didn't think Mickey would make a wager with me based on Rob's tax return so people would just have to decide who was telling the truth, me or "The Truth."

Double P.S.S. Nobody believes Rob, obviously. Which means nobody believes Mickey. It's a shame when a polyglot like Mickey, winning at machines, poker, and various sports, makes the "Not Likely to be Believed" roster of alleged APs. Damned shame. I hear Mickey still kills it at The Tangiers, however.

Double P.S.S. Nobody believes Rob, obviously. Which means nobody believes Mickey. It's a shame when a polyglot like Mickey, winning at machines, poker, and various sports, makes the "Not Likely to be Believed" roster of alleged APs. Damned shame. I hear Mickey still kills it at The Tangiers, however.

[/QUOTE]

Your jealousy shows. Mickey is lol .. fairly pathetic making his signature over me. Knock yourself out Mickey BUT as far as Redietz?.... Sooo jealous that APs beat sports when the situation is right. You want so hard to believe your handicapping crap. Outside of his lover of Singer, pretty sure people believe Mickey over any claims you've made.

I'd say that Mickey believing Singer isn't near as absurd as you thinking all these APs haven't been able to beat sports like they claim. No one here claiming to be a handicapper except you. Sure they have picks.. but not sure anyone has claimed to be some great handicapper. If you can't figure out what people say makes sense in whatever situation they found themselves in as AP+sportsbettors then that is your malfunction. You need to believe this for your own sake as you've pumped up yourself in your own mind and it shows.

Maybe that is part of your sarcasm?

Seriously bro, when you have barnaby on your side I'd go seriously reconsider my positions.

Mickey's big problem is once he achieves man-love for someone he doesn't let up. Whether Singer or Trump. That's just how his brain works. Who cares if he believes Singer. That shit has been rehashed repeatedly.

[TheGrimReaper]

Seriously bro, when you have barnaby on your side I'd go seriously reconsider my positions.

--->

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
Subterranean Homeboy Blues (Law & Order episode).

https://anagram-solver.net/%20Seriou....?partial=true


"Suberranean Homeboy" went from shitting all over himself, to finally flushing himself down the VCT toilet. I mean, I didn't say anything about it, until now. Looks like he has/had me on "ignore", again, and, so, was winging it, like Crimm, running fantasies in their heads. Thus seeking some truly weird angle.

Anyway, he's again thus inadvertently become the Reaper's "little helper", as with my post-37. Just look at where the homeboy link leads, and, then, look at the next entry.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_%2...(season_1)#ep2

I wonder that he's on tilt, or something. Not that long ago, he was trying to figure out how to get a line of credit from a casino.


TheGrimReaper
TheGrimReaper is online now
Silver
TheGrimReaper's Avatar

Join Date
Sep 2022
Posts
43 ----------------> 43 = (1 + 42) ---> 1/42.


Double P.S. The reversed time of the Springfield song, in my last post.

https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...l=1#post152285

37 is sort of the opposite of 42, to do with the electromagnetic fine-structure constants in the alternate forms of our universe. We live in the corrupt form.

Similarly, 42 = (10*4 + 2) ---> 142

[redietz]

Well, it comes down to this, basically, regarding the Leonardo da AP narrative.

1) What's more likely, (A1) that experts in particular sports have managed to win, grinding and battling each season or (A2) a population of self-proclaimed APs have managed to solve "sports betting" -- across all or most sports -- based on angles and principles and shopping?

2) That (B1) experts in particular sports can anticipate line moves based on their experience with the public, their experience with where most money will come from, and their experience with interpreting media coverage so as to provide the occasional arbitrage opportunity or consistent middle shots or (B2) APs can arbitrage most sports most of the time?

3) That (C1) line moves are erratic, based as often on media coverage, how the public interprets information, and vulnerable to zig-zagging by someone like Billy Walters or (C2) taking advantage of "slow" or "weak" lines is something APs can do on a regular basis?

4) That (D1) winning handicappers are specialists, focusing on particular sports where they have massive experience and intimate knowledge or (D2) winning handicappers are APs using their generalized approach to conquer all sports?

5) That (E1) winning handicappers are few and far between and have lifetimes of records backing them up or (E2) APs can be winning handicappers with some insight and application of their ideas as to what comprises an edge, but have no public records of such edges?

What's more likely, really, that many APs are jacks of all trades, conquering the betting world from every direction or that they are overestimating their abilities because they prefer to think of themselves as conquering polymaths?

One would expect the APs to be dominating all of the handicapping competitions. But they do not.

I leave the reader to draw his or her own conclusions.

[mcap]

Why does everything always circle back to handicapping contests with Redeitz?

[monet]

Well, it comes down to this, basically, regarding the Leonardo da AP narrative.

1) What's more likely, (A1) that experts in particular sports have managed to win, grinding and battling each season or (A2) a population of self-proclaimed APs have managed to solve "sports betting" -- across all or most sports -- based on angles and principles and shopping?

2) That (B1) experts in particular sports can anticipate line moves based on their experience with the public, their experience with where most money will come from, and their experience with interpreting media coverage so as to provide the occasional arbitrage opportunity or consistent middle shots or (B2) APs can arbitrage most sports most of the time?

3) That (C1) line moves are erratic, based as often on media coverage, how the public interprets information, and vulnerable to zig-zagging by someone like Billy Walters or (C2) taking advantage of "slow" or "weak" lines is something APs can do on a regular basis?

4) That (D1) winning handicappers are specialists, focusing on particular sports where they have massive experience and intimate knowledge or (D2) winning handicappers are APs using their generalized approach to conquer all sports?

5) That (E1) winning handicappers are few and far between and have lifetimes of records backing them up or (E2) APs can be winning handicappers with some insight and application of their ideas as to what comprises an edge, but have no public records of such edges?

What's more likely, really, that many APs are jacks of all trades, conquering the betting world from every direction or that they are overestimating their abilities because they prefer to think of themselves as conquering polymaths?

One would expect the APs to be dominating all of the handicapping competitions. But they do not.

I leave the reader to draw his or her own conclusions.

Diversify.

[coach belly]

I leave the reader to draw his or her own conclusions.

Not a problem...what a big player you are, in the money 40+ years...right?

Do you own that home on Forrest Gump Lane?

You wrote about other handicappers living there.

2BR 2BA....how many human roommates do you have?...you never did say.

[kewlJ]

I'd say that Mickey believing Singer isn't near as absurd as you thinking all these APs haven't been able to beat sports like they claim.

Mickey's big problem is once he achieves man-love for someone he doesn't let up. Whether Singer or Trump. That's just how his brain works. Who cares if he believes Singer. That shit has been rehashed repeatedly.

Ok, first, I am trying to figure out the proper protocol here. Am I supposed to come to redietz's aid and back him up because he is part of my "crew" or "posse"? So happens this is one of several re-occurring things redietz brings up that I don't agree with. I think advantage play can be applied and incorporated into being part of winning sports betting strategy or play. The other re-occurring thing that he brings up is the anonymity of AP's. When I agree with someone, I say so. When I disagree, I say so.

I hope this proves to mickeycrimm, one and for all (doubt it will though) that there are no, teams, or crews or posse's. There are just members that agree or disagree on certain subjects, and the majority of people don't believe Singer or any of his many, many silly claims now. No crews. No posse's. Just reasonable people reaching the reasonable conclusion.

Now to what I quoted above. Wrong AiQ. Mickey believing Singer is more absurd that almost anything else, because it is NOT true. Mickey doesn't believe Singer. He just made a deal with him and now is playing games. Mickey has all but announced that he is just playing games.

[coach belly]

I hope this proves to mickeycrimm, one and for all (doubt it will though) that there are no, teams, or crews or posse's.

You originated the "crew" conspiracy among members here...now you disavow all that?

Fine...let's keep that in mind for future reference.

Here's another crossed-wires complaint you recently made....

I complained to management here about things said about me that are just flat out lies. Management responded that the way to handle that was to demand that the person prove what they are saying or link to where it was said. I have done that with both Rob and Mdawg and they just ignore it.

You have got to be kidding with that bullshit...have you no shame?

[accountinquestion]

Well, it comes down to this, basically, regarding the Leonardo da AP narrative.

1) What's more likely, (A1) that experts in particular sports have managed to win, grinding and battling each season or (A2) a population of self-proclaimed APs have managed to solve "sports betting" -- across all or most sports -- based on angles and principles and shopping?

2) That (B1) experts in particular sports can anticipate line moves based on their experience with the public, their experience with where most money will come from, and their experience with interpreting media coverage so as to provide the occasional arbitrage opportunity or consistent middle shots or (B2) APs can arbitrage most sports most of the time?

3) That (C1) line moves are erratic, based as often on media coverage, how the public interprets information, and vulnerable to zig-zagging by someone like Billy Walters or (C2) taking advantage of "slow" or "weak" lines is something APs can do on a regular basis?

4) That (D1) winning handicappers are specialists, focusing on particular sports where they have massive experience and intimate knowledge or (D2) winning handicappers are APs using their generalized approach to conquer all sports?

5) That (E1) winning handicappers are few and far between and have lifetimes of records backing them up or (E2) APs can be winning handicappers with some insight and application of their ideas as to what comprises an edge, but have no public records of such edges?

What's more likely, really, that many APs are jacks of all trades, conquering the betting world from every direction or that they are overestimating their abilities because they prefer to think of themselves as conquering polymaths?

One would expect the APs to be dominating all of the handicapping competitions. But they do not.

I leave the reader to draw his or her own conclusions.

It all comes down to weak lines. You have to find a source of what is equivalent to handicapping. You have to be able to do the math to figure out it is +EV. There are oodles of ways to fall within this. Doesn't matter what people tell you, your whole sense of self is tied into being some handicapper and you think that is the only way to beat sports.

It is funny how you make up shit to disagree with it. Who has said APs are "conquering the betting world from every direction"? Sure, but not some singular AP. Even positive handicappers fall under AP umbrella which makes your whole argument stupid.

You're such a fool if you think you'd know all secondary business of people in "handicapping competitions".

I'm pretty sure everyone here have described these situations as opportunities.

Perhaps the only reason you're so into these fucking contests is because you can beat them. If you had to beat juice I have a solid feeling you'd be/been a loser. This is why you're so quick to dismiss all the talk of prices and finding positive spots.

Not only that, but the market is going to be far less efficient because the house has no real interest in the outcome. You're playing against a bunch of amateurs. Oh you beat it huh? You should have cleaned up on fantasy sports like a lot of other APs did........... but you didn't ... we'll let the reader draw his or her own conclusions.

Actually maybe you are an AP because you only play contests. lol

[accountinquestion]

Why does everything always circle back to handicapping contests with Redeitz?

See above for my theory.