Page 20 of 105 FirstFirst ... 101617181920212223243070 ... LastLast
Results 381 to 400 of 2100

Thread: Professional Sportsbetting

  1. #381
    Originally Posted by monet View Post
    I'm just gonna drop this song reco here since it makes more sense in this thread...

    RIP Milton Berle.

  2. #382
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    Originally Posted by Seedvalue View Post
    And I can cash any check you can write 10 times over little dick
    Bwa ha ha ha

    You are just SO full of shit.

    Imagine, a mouth breathing hustler claiming he'd eclipse a trial attorney.

    Go fuck yourself.
    On the life of my dead father I’m confident I have more money then you. It’s doubtful you have 7 figures let alone 8. At anytime you would like to bet feel free to let me know. You’re just another fraud probably the biggest on these boards besides queerj. Trial lawyers lol. Fraud

  3. #383
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    Originally Posted by Seedvalue View Post
    Bet your net worth against mine.
    Oh, still trying to play "mine is bigger than yours?"

    I'll concede one thing: you ARE the biggest prick on the board.
    Yeah read your post over the last 10 years. What a trial lawyer doing posting on these boards ? One that says openly he’s a plop gambler ?

    Hopefully your life ends soon as I said you have not provided anything of value for one person in your entire life. I honestly hate your existence. You came
    To the defense of a guy who beat his wife and did time for multiple felonies. Your life means nothing just for that

  4. #384
    Originally Posted by Seedvalue View Post
    On the life of my dead father I’m confident I have more money then you.
    What, did you kill your father to collect the life insurance?

    Sleazy but effective.

    What an AP !

    As for my gambling I play for the fun of it, so I need not bet huge sums on negative expectation games.

    Unlike you I've already succeeded in life, now I enjoy (and willingly piss away some of) the fruits of my success.
    What, Me Worry?

  5. #385
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    There is no "the math" for sports betting.

    LOL. That's something, like the tooth fairy and Santa Claus, people tell themselves to justify why they think they're getting something for nothing.

    I like that analogy. May have to copyright it.

    "The math" is personal speculation. It's like anuses. Everybody has one and some are more full of it than others. I can't copyright that. Somebody beat me to it.

    There's nothing wrong with personal speculation. Heuristics. That's the gist of sports betting. Just don't call it "the math" or "EV." That's like calling your pickup line in a bar "The Method."

    One of my partners always asks, "If you have the 60K, why do you need the 1.3?"

    And finally, if it's correct that Fezzik rarely plays that type of money, I hope for his sake that he did not repeat his faux pas from 10 or 12 years ago. That would have been a Nicky Santoro kind of faux pas.
    LOL Where do the numbers come from for sides, totals and money lines if no math is involved. Can you get a noted professional sportsbettor to agree with you? No, you can't. So far, saying no math is involved is the stupidest thing you've ever said.

    Who said Fezzik needed the 1.3K? He obviously didn't need the 60K or he wouldn't have bet it.

    Professional Sportsbettors appearing in this thread that use the math:

    Frank B.
    Spanky
    Porter
    Capt. Jack Andrews
    Steve Fezzik

    Professional Sportsbettors appearing in this thread that don't use the math:

    Bob Dietz
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  6. #386
    This sportsbettor, Mathew Buchalter, like Fezzik, is an actuary. Amazing how many of these guys have math based degree's. This guy's website is called Plus EV Analytics. He teaches the mathematics of sportsbetting:



    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  7. #387
    More Buchalter on a podcast called Profit From Perspective:

    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  8. #388

  9. #389
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    More Buchalter on a podcast called Profit From Perspective:


    Here's hoping "Plus EV Analytics" heads a "seminar" at BetBash.

    The great thing about running a shop called Plus EV Analytics is that you don't have to know diddly about sports. LOL. They're not just Jacks of All Trades. Their PhD's ( I say that with both ironic sarcasm and respect, as my late wife had two of them).

    And then we have the rather obvious question. What's to prevent someone who knows sports (or rather, a particular sport) from exercising every math skill the alleged "Plus EV Analytics" folks display? Do they have secret formulas? Wisdom handed down from gnostic masters? Clairvoyance? Venusian calculus?

    I mean, there's nothing that prevents some poor soul such as, say -- wait for it -- Billy Walters, from hiring the absolute best from math fields, getting the best programmers, and the best minds, and simply folding all of that into what he does.

    Oh wait, he already has been doing that. For about 40 years.

  10. #390
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    More Buchalter on a podcast called Profit From Perspective:


    Here's hoping "Plus EV Analytics" heads a "seminar" at BetBash.

    The great thing about running a shop called Plus EV Analytics is that you don't have to know diddly about sports. LOL. They're not just Jacks of All Trades. Their PhD's ( I say that with both ironic sarcasm and respect, as my late wife had two of them).

    And then we have the rather obvious question. What's to prevent someone who knows sports (or rather, a particular sport) from exercising every math skill the alleged "Plus EV Analytics" folks display? Do they have secret formulas? Wisdom handed down from gnostic masters? Clairvoyance? Venusian calculus?

    I mean, there's nothing that prevents some poor soul such as, say -- wait for it -- Billy Walters, from hiring the absolute best from math fields, getting the best programmers, and the best minds, and simply folding all of that into what he does.

    Oh wait, he already has been doing that. For about 40 years.

    What a bizarre argument.

  11. #391
    You guys are a trip. Sports betting has, for decades, been a much larger enterprise than all of the various AP angled nonsense on this forum combined. Do you really believe over the last 60 years that multi-millionaires haven't been hiring the best programmers to data mine every sport for every correlation on the planet, to run simulations out the wazoo, to hire math experts from all fields -- logistics, probability, calculus, and programming -- in attempts to solve each sport?

    I mean, to quote Wesley Snipes in the movie Dolemite, what planet are you from? There have been shingles hung claiming to have attacked sports betting from every cutting-edge angle with whatever was available at that point in time, and it's been going on for 60 years.

    This ain't card counting.

  12. #392
    How can you give a ROI on your tout service without the concept of EV?

    Redietz, you're becoming more and more nonsensical if you don't realize it.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  13. #393
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    This ain't card counting.
    Did you really just stoop to this level? I have heard that you can be condescending and talk down to people.

    The basis of card counting may be elementary and nothing new. But finding ways to implement it and apply variations of age old techniques against an industry that has spent more time, money, technology trying to stop card counters in particular is what takes innovation and creativity that people like you can't possibly understand. YOU try earning a living via card counting for just one year and then get back to me and see if you still want to put card counters down. I think you would last about a week.

    You aren't even arguing with a card counter and yet you felt the need to put card counters down trying to elevate yourself (I guess), simply because you are having a hard time these days explaining what you do and have done.

    You may look down on card counters, but I can tell you this much...anyone who has looked into me, my brother (as a number have done recently) or any other card counter that I know, won't find unpaid tax bills.

  14. #394
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    How can you give a ROI on your tout service without the concept of EV?

    Redietz, you're becoming more and more nonsensical if you don't realize it.
    would you feel better about his service if he posted some screenshots of the tickets on his winning wagers_______?

    he's offered to do that in the past



    Name:  hysterical-laughter.gif
Views: 299
Size:  417.0 KB
    please don't feed the trolls

  15. #395
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    You guys are a trip. Sports betting has, for decades, been a much larger enterprise than all of the various AP angled nonsense on this forum combined. Do you really believe over the last 60 years that multi-millionaires haven't been hiring the best programmers to data mine every sport for every correlation on the planet, to run simulations out the wazoo, to hire math experts from all fields -- logistics, probability, calculus, and programming -- in attempts to solve each sport?

    I mean, to quote Wesley Snipes in the movie Dolemite, what planet are you from? There have been shingles hung claiming to have attacked sports betting from every cutting-edge angle with whatever was available at that point in time, and it's been going on for 60 years.

    This ain't card counting.

    What is the position you think you are arguing against?

  16. #396
    https://twitter.com/bookslimitingus lol Redietz and his nonsense.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  17. #397
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    More Buchalter on a podcast called Profit From Perspective:


    Here's hoping "Plus EV Analytics" heads a "seminar" at BetBash.

    The great thing about running a shop called Plus EV Analytics is that you don't have to know diddly about sports. LOL. They're not just Jacks of All Trades. Their PhD's ( I say that with both ironic sarcasm and respect, as my late wife had two of them).

    And then we have the rather obvious question. What's to prevent someone who knows sports (or rather, a particular sport) from exercising every math skill the alleged "Plus EV Analytics" folks display? Do they have secret formulas? Wisdom handed down from gnostic masters? Clairvoyance? Venusian calculus?

    I mean, there's nothing that prevents some poor soul such as, say -- wait for it -- Billy Walters, from hiring the absolute best from math fields, getting the best programmers, and the best minds, and simply folding all of that into what he does.

    Oh wait, he already has been doing that. For about 40 years.
    Ditz, you are getting more and more bizarre....taking my side of the argument. Lay off the weed. You just admitted Walter's was doing exactly what I'VE BEEN SAYING he was doing.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  18. #398
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    You guys are a trip. Sports betting has, for decades, been a much larger enterprise than all of the various AP angled nonsense on this forum combined. Do you really believe over the last 60 years that multi-millionaires haven't been hiring the best programmers to data mine every sport for every correlation on the planet, to run simulations out the wazoo, to hire math experts from all fields -- logistics, probability, calculus, and programming -- in attempts to solve each sport?

    I mean, to quote Wesley Snipes in the movie Dolemite, what planet are you from? There have been shingles hung claiming to have attacked sports betting from every cutting-edge angle with whatever was available at that point in time, and it's been going on for 60 years.

    This ain't card counting.
    Thanks for confirming that math is used in sports betting. If AP's, as you say, don't have what it takes to make it in sports betting, could you explain to us why journalists have the right background to be excellent professional sports bettors?
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  19. #399
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    You guys are a trip. Sports betting has, for decades, been a much larger enterprise than all of the various AP angled nonsense on this forum combined. Do you really believe over the last 60 years that multi-millionaires haven't been hiring the best programmers to data mine every sport for every correlation on the planet, to run simulations out the wazoo, to hire math experts from all fields -- logistics, probability, calculus, and programming -- in attempts to solve each sport?

    I mean, to quote Wesley Snipes in the movie Dolemite, what planet are you from? There have been shingles hung claiming to have attacked sports betting from every cutting-edge angle with whatever was available at that point in time, and it's been going on for 60 years.

    This ain't card counting.
    Thanks for confirming that math is used in sports betting. If AP's, as you say, don't have what it takes to make it in sports betting, could you explain to us why journalists have the right background to be excellent professional sports bettors?

    When interviewed in the past as to why I've been able to win betting college football, I have always given the same answer as to what I'd suggest is necessary (but not sufficient). A degree in journalism is not one of the requirements.

  20. #400
    Mickey Crimm on Gambling With an Edge. The YouTube version is better than the LV Advisor site
    JSTAT on casinos, poker, and blackjack/baccarat card counting without charge. Saying what needs to said at https://twitter.com/Casino_Examiner

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. What are best sportsbetting apps in Vegas?
    By PIGGY BANKER in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-14-2020, 12:44 PM
  2. The Future of Sportsbetting
    By mickeycrimm in forum Sports & Sportsbetting
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-05-2018, 08:03 AM
  3. Sportsbetting ONLY thread
    By LoneStarHorse in forum Sports & Sportsbetting
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 02-05-2016, 04:48 PM
  4. Sportsbetting
    By LoneStarHorse in forum Sports & Sportsbetting
    Replies: 143
    Last Post: 02-03-2016, 07:09 PM
  5. Sportsbetting Anguish
    By Rob.Singer in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 12-21-2011, 11:17 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •