Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 80

Thread: Note to Regnis

  1. #21
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    Hey Red, I'm still waiting to hear from the producer of the show you told me about; you know, you were going to try to hook us up because of your appreciation of my creative writing / flaming in Tasha's Young Axl Rose and Cake Cream in 2022 thread in the Whatever's On Your Mind section.

    In all candor, Ilovebigknockers is knocking 'em out of the park as well.

    Gotta say that retirement is swell, it gives me time to fuck around with such meaningless yet fun things.

    Hoping that phone will ring and BAM, off to Hollywood...
    No Hollywood for me, man. My dialogue writing is so bad, but it turns out as long as I just repeat what I've already heard, I'm fine. I do have to tread lightly, though. As someone said to me, "If four people knew the story, and three of them are dead, they're going to know who leaked the story." Wisdom to ponder.

  2. #22
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    In summary, we have comments by account, Axelwolf, and smurgerburger who demonstrate they had literally no idea what they were looking at or talking about, and account couldn't be bothered to figure out what he was reading. I assume Axelwolf didn't bother to read it. He just decided to comment. Who knows if smurger read anything before commenting.

    Standard "AP" brilliance in action.
    Basically irrelevant stuff red. None of it should bother you, and instead of arguing with these guys you should be posting about how your GWAE interview is shaping up. That---and showing your appreciation to mickey for doing all the legwork in trying to get you folks hooked up.

    Kew, obviously you never listen to people who know what they're talking about. But blabbing about running "half marathons" with your tender ticker just shows more of your stupidity. I was running 4-5 miles per day no matter where I was in the world when I was your age. My feet now tell me walking would have been a lot better. Many "runners" suffer bad knees, nerve damage, need hip replacements etc. as they age. Shouldn't be a problem for you though; you'll be lucky to see 50

  3. #23
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post

    Kew, obviously you never listen to people who know what they're talking about. But blabbing about running "half marathons" with your tender ticker just shows more of your stupidity. I was running 4-5 miles per day no matter where I was in the world when I was your age. My feet now tell me walking would have been a lot better. Many "runners" suffer bad knees, nerve damage, need hip replacements etc. as they age. Shouldn't be a problem for you though; you'll be lucky to see 50
    This is more Ron Singer desperately seeking my attention. No one cares Ron, you are a has been.

  4. #24
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    No one cares Ron, you are a has been.
    He cannot be a "has been" because he's always been a "never was".

  5. #25
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post

    Kew, obviously you never listen to people who know what they're talking about. But blabbing about running "half marathons" with your tender ticker just shows more of your stupidity. I was running 4-5 miles per day no matter where I was in the world when I was your age. My feet now tell me walking would have been a lot better. Many "runners" suffer bad knees, nerve damage, need hip replacements etc. as they age. Shouldn't be a problem for you though; you'll be lucky to see 50
    This is more Ron Singer desperately seeking my attention. No one cares Ron, you are a has been.
    Something you've never learned about forum-posting kew: when you truly believe you "don't care" and/or someone's "seeking your attention" you simply ignore them, and they'll more often than not, stop the torture.

    And you apparently haven't heard--Better to be a "has been" than the person who gets "mocked and laughed at for his faults" in the present.

    You have a lot to learn. Too bad your infections, diseases, and death-defying promiscuous lifestyle will never allow you the opportunity.

  6. #26
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    No one cares Ron, you are a has been.
    He cannot be a "has been" because he's always been a "never was".
    Yes, I thought about that when I posted it.

    He is a never was as far as the winning player that he has always wanted to be. But apparently, he was a top troll for years, even decades, for those that celebrate and appreciate that kind of thing. But now he is just a washed up, "has been" as even trolls go. I mean seriously, it is the same old recycled schtick and attacks that he has used on many others over the decades. It is like watching reruns of a TV show or some comedian using the same material he used 10, 15 years ago.

  7. #27
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post

    Something you've never learned about forum-posting kew: when you truly believe you "don't care" and/or someone's "seeking your attention" you simply ignore them, and they'll more often than not, stop the torture.
    I did ignore you Ron. I stopped posting on that GForum you slunk (is that a word) off to with your tail between your legs when Dan Druff humiliated you here in June. But you are so obsessed with me, and so desperately seek and need my attention that you have returned here, a forum you said you would never post at again. Pathetic Ron, just really, really pathetic.

  8. #28
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    In summary, we have comments by account, Axelwolf, and smurgerburger who demonstrate they had literally no idea what they were looking at or talking about, and account couldn't be bothered to figure out what he was reading. I assume Axelwolf didn't bother to read it. He just decided to comment. Who knows if smurger read anything before commenting.

    Standard "AP" brilliance in action.
    I read enough.

    It is fairly clear you were fishing for some sort of redemption after the absolute beating you took in that other thread. Then you got Kewl coming in with his standard routine. lol. You gave us the bait, now don't be too upset someone took it.

    I would get on GWAE ASAP to try and get your name elevated so maybe you have more opportunities.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  9. #29
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Really, you guys are unbelievable. You are posting negatively about somebody competing with live bankroll for two months and finishing in the top five out of 650 people.

    You must have a problem with folks who are actually capable of doing something.
    If you'd at least explained what your point was and given a link. Instead of talking to someone else about "our favorite handicapper". I have seen this behavior somewhere... oh yea 5th grade. I remember now.

    Literally not only should it have only been a private message, you intentionally went vague to help ensure there was nothing of interest to anyone. Then you whine.. So stop being a loser, red.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  10. #30
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    It is not that unbelievable, regnis. Whatever new thread comes along is immediately hijacked by accountinquestion and a few others, into continuing whatever trolling they are doing at the time, in this case trolling redietz and his sportsbetting.

    THAT is what this forum has been reduced to for several years now. I have complained about it for years now and am repeatedly told by AinQ and other trolls, that this is the way they like it.....a troll forum. Druff doesn't seem to care one way or the other.
    Amazing that you are blind to all the trolling that ditz is doing. But they say love is blind. He's actually taken your place as the number one troll.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  11. #31
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    I have seen this behavior somewhere... oh yea 5th grade. I remember now.
    But do you remember which of your 3 years in the 5th grade it was?

  12. #32
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    I have seen this behavior somewhere... oh yea 5th grade. I remember now.
    But do you remember which of your 3 years in the 5th grade it was?
    Tewlj quit school in the 3rd grade when he got his driver's license.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  13. #33
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Amazing that you are blind to all the trolling that ditz is doing. But they say love is blind. He's actually taken your place as the number one troll.
    No I am not blind to anything mickey. I have repeatedly stated some things that redietz is wrong about in my opinion.

    But here is the way I see what is/has happened here. Redietz is a bit old school in what he does. As often happens, he seems unable or unwilling to accept that there are other ways to gain an advantage other than what he has done for decades.

    Now we could have gotten into an honest discussion about that, that could have benefited many, and many of us could have learned something, except you and other that don't like redietz, some that have even admitted it saying "because he is arrogant and looks and talks down to people", have decided to just gang up on and attack him instead. And now he has turned defensive as would be expected and we are deeper into the usual trolling and attacking that this forum is famous for.

    One big pissing contest with no one benefiting the way it always is.

  14. #34
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    I have seen this behavior somewhere... oh yea 5th grade. I remember now.
    But do you remember which of your 3 years in the 5th grade it was?
    You're so right you're not a troll. This attempt is so goddam weak it can't even be considered a troll.

    Now we could have gotten into an honest discussion about that, that could have benefited many, and many of us could have learned something, except you and other that don't like redietz, some that have even admitted it saying "because he is arrogant and looks and talks down to people", have decided to just gang up on and attack him instead. And now he has turned defensive as would be expected and we are deeper into the usual trolling and attacking that this forum is famous for.
    Redietz has never made any attempt at a serious discussion. Never any sort of back and forth. Ask him a serious question that doesn't jive with his nonsense and it is crickets.

    Red's main problem is he has no clue what he doesn't know and thats what gets him in trouble.

    Now he's trying to suggest he knows some mafia secrets and he would be in danger. At some point I should just feel sorry for him given how hard he tries to impress but then I remember who I am dealing with.

    Kewl likes Redietz because they have more in common with each than others on this forum. 2 characters who will the same 2 characters forever.

    Although in fairness to Kewl. Kewl does answer questions and loves to share info on blackjack. I do believe he is an expert. I'm not sure about BJ in Vegas being Kewl's source of income or not. Redietz on the other hand never talks about any sorts of specifics. Ask him a tough question and you'll get silence. Kewl will at least make an effort to share. Redietz puts more energy into telling people how they're wrong and it is almost always some bullshit semantical argument he makes.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  15. #35
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    In summary, we have comments by account, Axelwolf, and smurgerburger who demonstrate they had literally no idea what they were looking at or talking about, and account couldn't be bothered to figure out what he was reading. I assume Axelwolf didn't bother to read it. He just decided to comment. Who knows if smurger read anything before commenting.

    Standard "AP" brilliance in action.
    Oh my gawd!!! I was just joking and fucking with YOU, not Regnis. Obviously, I barely knew what you guys are talking about, I didn't even look.

    FFS, you guys get so sensitive over little shit that is clearly a joke, I even said J/K.

    P.S. I asked you a few legitimate questions in the other thread and got nothing but crickets.

  16. #36
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post

    You're so right you're not a troll. This attempt is so goddam weak it can't even be considered a troll.

    Now we could have gotten into an honest discussion about that, that could have benefited many, and many of us could have learned something, except you and other that don't like redietz, some that have even admitted it saying "because he is arrogant and looks and talks down to people", have decided to just gang up on and attack him instead. And now he has turned defensive as would be expected and we are deeper into the usual trolling and attacking that this forum is famous for.
    Redietz has never made any attempt at a serious discussion. Never any sort of back and forth. Ask him a serious question that doesn't jive with his nonsense and it is crickets.

    Red's main problem is he has no clue what he doesn't know and thats what gets him in trouble.

    Now he's trying to suggest he knows some mafia secrets and he would be in danger. At some point I should just feel sorry for him given how hard he tries to impress but then I remember who I am dealing with.

    Kewl likes Redietz because they have more in common with each than others on this forum. 2 characters who will the same 2 characters forever.

    Although in fairness to Kewl. Kewl does answer questions and loves to share info on blackjack. I do believe he is an expert. I'm not sure about BJ in Vegas being Kewl's source of income or not. Redietz on the other hand never talks about any sorts of specifics. Ask him a tough question and you'll get silence. Kewl will at least make an effort to share. Redietz puts more energy into telling people how they're wrong and it is almost always some bullshit semantical argument he makes.
    Redietz's main problem is that, outside of current transient bonus whoring and promotional parlay boosters, every angle that "APs" are using was available and used by handicappers for the last 40 years. Not only that, the mechanics of doing what "APs" are claiming to do to make money across all sports were easier 40 years ago. Much easier. So when "APs" claim to be cruising through sports betting, it's comical. Handicappers have been doing what the current "APs" claim to do, have done it in more favorable environments for doing it, and are aware it's logistically difficult and nowhere near guaranteed. But the crop of "APs" on this site have decided a poor old handicapper doesn't have the savvy to recognize these huge advantages featuring "soft numbers" -- my favorite, "steam chasing" -- gag me with a spoon, and arbitrage.

    All of these things were easier 40 years ago, and every handicapper worth his salt was doing them 24/7. Except, for example, we didn't call them "soft numbers" because that's a misnomer. Wrong verbiage there. Middles shooting and arbitrage have existed forever.

    The only thing the "APs" have going for them versus an experienced handicapper from 30 years ago are bonuses (gimmickry that will not sustain you), parlay boosters (the percent advantage of which are technically figured incorrectly, by the way, because the comparison should be with straight plays, not other parlays). Programs that alert one to arbitrage or middles were being used by Larry Fletcher (AKA Southern Comfort) before Windows existed. Meanwhile, the current crop of "APs," versus handicappers from 30 years ago, has numerous disadvantages of which they are blithely unaware.

    But the narrative, as so beautifully put by account, is that I just don't understand the inner secrets of "AP" sports wagering. They have secrets, abilities, and priorities that can create continual winning across all sports. I just cannot grasp it. I've done what they do, sans bonuses (which I am saving for a rainy day) for 40 years, but I just can't see the opportunities they see.

    That's quite a storyline. The secret world of "AP" sports betting. What is it that you maroons do that you think handicappers haven't been doing since the dawn of time, and under better conditions?

  17. #37
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Redietz on the other hand never talks about any sorts of specifics. Ask him a tough question and you'll get silence.
    Don't know what happened to my original response to this, as it disappeared during my edit process. So I will try again.

    Dude, you do realize that MOST AP's, whether professional playing for a living or recreational, but playing seriously, rarely get too specific about what they do. There is a good reason for that.

    I am in a liile bit of a different boat, since what I do, card counting is completely known by everyone, casinos included. Nothing new here, so I can't get into too much trouble describing some of what I do. I can get into a little trouble being too specific about some of the ways I apply different things that allows for longevity, which is why I only reveal some of that.

    So I don't know why you are giving redeitz shit for something almost all AP, and winning players do...not get too specific or share everything they do.
    Last edited by kewlJ; 02-27-2023 at 06:39 PM.

  18. #38
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Redietz's main problem is that, outside of current transient bonus whoring and promotional parlay boosters, every angle that "APs" are using was available and used by handicappers for the last 40 years. Not only that, the mechanics of doing what "APs" are claiming to do to make money across all sports were easier 40 years ago. Much easier. So when "APs" claim to be cruising through sports betting, it's comical. Handicappers have been doing what the current "APs" claim to do, have done it in more favorable environments for doing it, and are aware it's logistically difficult and nowhere near guaranteed. But the crop of "APs" on this site have decided a poor old handicapper doesn't have the savvy to recognize these huge advantages featuring "soft numbers" -- my favorite, "steam chasing" -- gag me with a spoon, and arbitrage.

    All of these things were easier 40 years ago, and every handicapper worth his salt was doing them 24/7. Except, for example, we didn't call them "soft numbers" because that's a misnomer. Wrong verbiage there. Middles shooting and arbitrage have existed forever.

    The only thing the "APs" have going for them versus an experienced handicapper from 30 years ago are bonuses (gimmickry that will not sustain you), parlay boosters (the percent advantage of which are technically figured incorrectly, by the way, because the comparison should be with straight plays, not other parlays). Programs that alert one to arbitrage or middles were being used by Larry Fletcher (AKA Southern Comfort) before Windows existed. Meanwhile, the current crop of "APs," versus handicappers from 30 years ago, has numerous disadvantages of which they are blithely unaware.

    But the narrative, as so beautifully put by account, is that I just don't understand the inner secrets of "AP" sports wagering. They have secrets, abilities, and priorities that can create continual winning across all sports. I just cannot grasp it. I've done what they do, sans bonuses (which I am saving for a rainy day) for 40 years, but I just can't see the opportunities they see.

    That's quite a storyline. The secret world of "AP" sports betting. What is it that you maroons do that you think handicappers haven't been doing since the dawn of time, and under better conditions?
    Well this post is confusing and a contradiction, at least to me. On one hand you are saying the things AP's are doing in regard to sports betting are not sustainable. On the other hand, you say that handicappers have been doing these same things for 40 years.

    I know you are getting defensive here, and it is understandable with these clowns ganging up on you the way they do, when they decide they don't like someone. I suppose there also may be a bit of you, a traditional sports better/handicapper for decades, don't like that some AP's have moved into your territory and as a result you seem to be declaring war on ALL AP's.

    Here is something I have mentioned before. I don't see anybody claiming that sports betting via AP methods, math, bonuses, promotions, is something they do singularly for a living. THAT is actually very contradictory to what an advantage player is. Almost all AP's do many different things. So if someone like Axel, or mickey or anyone else is doing something with sports betting that can give them an advantage, it is only a small part of the totality of their advantage play. And like everything else they do, if it is not sustainable and bonues and promotions dry up, they move on to the next advantage play.

  19. #39
    I just gave a list of specifics that handicappers have been doing for 40 years. We bonus whore, we arbitrage, we middles shoot. No surprises there. Plus we know something about the teams. Plus we know something about the habits of the betting public. That means we can anticipate the line moves with varying degrees of accuracy once they are first posted.

    Now "APs" somehow can do better than we do because...why? They belong to a secret society? They say so? They claim A, B, and C?

    Account likes to talk about specifics. I can check off a handful of reasons why middling and/or arbitrage were easier 30 years ago. And the bonuses have been around offshore forever. I once earned 12% interest keeping my money in my offshore account rather than withdrawing it.

    This is going to come down to the "APs" claiming they have secret ways of earning money across all sports. That must be it because everything else they do can also be done by handicappers. That's the bottom line. So the "APs" must have gnosis, baby. The secret knowledge. The keys to the universe.

    Or more likely not.

  20. #40
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Redietz's main problem is that, outside of current transient bonus whoring and promotional parlay boosters, every angle that "APs" are using was available and used by handicappers for the last 40 years. Not only that, the mechanics of doing what "APs" are claiming to do to make money across all sports were easier 40 years ago. Much easier. So when "APs" claim to be cruising through sports betting, it's comical. Handicappers have been doing what the current "APs" claim to do, have done it in more favorable environments for doing it, and are aware it's logistically difficult and nowhere near guaranteed. But the crop of "APs" on this site have decided a poor old handicapper doesn't have the savvy to recognize these huge advantages featuring "soft numbers" -- my favorite, "steam chasing" -- gag me with a spoon, and arbitrage.

    All of these things were easier 40 years ago, and every handicapper worth his salt was doing them 24/7. Except, for example, we didn't call them "soft numbers" because that's a misnomer. Wrong verbiage there. Middles shooting and arbitrage have existed forever.

    The only thing the "APs" have going for them versus an experienced handicapper from 30 years ago are bonuses (gimmickry that will not sustain you), parlay boosters (the percent advantage of which are technically figured incorrectly, by the way, because the comparison should be with straight plays, not other parlays). Programs that alert one to arbitrage or middles were being used by Larry Fletcher (AKA Southern Comfort) before Windows existed. Meanwhile, the current crop of "APs," versus handicappers from 30 years ago, has numerous disadvantages of which they are blithely unaware.

    But the narrative, as so beautifully put by account, is that I just don't understand the inner secrets of "AP" sports wagering. They have secrets, abilities, and priorities that can create continual winning across all sports. I just cannot grasp it. I've done what they do, sans bonuses (which I am saving for a rainy day) for 40 years, but I just can't see the opportunities they see.

    That's quite a storyline. The secret world of "AP" sports betting. What is it that you maroons do that you think handicappers haven't been doing since the dawn of time, and under better conditions?
    Well this post is confusing and a contradiction, at least to me. On one hand you are saying the things AP's are doing in regard to sports betting are not sustainable. On the other hand, you say that handicappers have been doing these same things for 40 years.

    I know you are getting defensive here, and it is understandable with these clowns ganging up on you the way they do, when they decide they don't like someone. I suppose there also may be a bit of you, a traditional sports better/handicapper for decades, don't like that some AP's have moved into your territory and as a result you seem to be declaring war on ALL AP's.

    Here is something I have mentioned before. I don't see anybody claiming that sports betting via AP methods, math, bonuses, promotions, is something they do singularly for a living. THAT is actually very contradictory to what an advantage player is. Almost all AP's do many different things. So if someone like Axel, or mickey or anyone else is doing something with sports betting that can give them an advantage, it is only a small part of the totality of their advantage play. And like everything else they do, if it is not sustainable and bonues and promotions dry up, they move on to the next advantage play.
    The bonuses are window dressing. Arbitraging and middles shooting are much easier when you are intimately familiar with a sport and can anticipate line moves. That's not the purview of "APs." It requires a level of intimacy with a particular sport to be able to do that consistently. I'm good at college football line moves. When I commit to saying a game will move one way, I'm right about 70% of the time. That's not handicapping teams; that's handicapping the public. It's a handicapping skill.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Interesting Season -- For Boz and Regnis
    By redietz in forum Sports & Sportsbetting
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-17-2022, 04:00 PM
  2. A Note From Alan
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 91
    Last Post: 07-16-2022, 01:15 PM
  3. Video Poker Note
    By redietz in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 266
    Last Post: 02-04-2016, 03:05 PM
  4. Regnis at Horseplayer World Series
    By redietz in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-31-2015, 01:10 PM
  5. Good Luck to Regnis at the NHC!
    By redietz in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-29-2014, 12:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •