He was from El Paso but I’m posting it in the Las Vegas subforum anyways. I’m not sure what his vaccination status was.
He was from El Paso but I’m posting it in the Las Vegas subforum anyways. I’m not sure what his vaccination status was.
First reaction: Gee, every time I turn the computer on, there's more talk of death. Chastised the gematria forum, about it, just last week.
Second reaction: Make hay. "Five-time WSOP winner Scotty Nguyen tweeted that he "can't believe this day has come - you will always be held high in our hearts, the man, the myth, the legend & THE GODFATHER of poker baby! Mr Brunson, you made poker what it is baby! thank you for what you give to all of us baby! RIP Mr Doyle Brunson THE GODFATHER OF POKER."
Yeah, baby, just like my very recent remark, "I'm all you can eat, baby." https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...l=1#post157406 . Isn't this another of Nguyen's lines? Ha. Even after the conscious effort not to go there, into the psychic stuff.
They put Martha Stewart on the Cover of the Swimsuit Issue of Sports Illustrated.
I'm puking my guts out just thinking about that.
Oh yeah... RIP Doyle.
Hope you beat the shit out of Chip in Hell.
And Fuck mcap you Fucking Redskin!
Doyle was cool.
RIP
What, Me Worry?
Cool would have been "cashing out" at age, 102, to match his two famous poker hands of 10-2, and 10-2.Originally Posted by MisterV
One of my favorite death quotes relating to Poker is,"At the end of life, we all lay down the losing hand!"
https://photos.app.goo.gl/Zk2WAFzDcrJ7pjNB7
Take comfort in the fact that no one is actually backing up his wishes to have you permanantly banned.
Smart is knowing a Tomato is a fruit.
Wise is knowing a Tomato doesn't belong in a fruit salad.
Sorry, can't help you, reached my Posting Limit!
Could have been worse. Could have been Mr./Mrs Jenner!Originally Posted by monet
Same Difference.Originally Posted by jbjbCould have been worse. Could have been Mr./Mrs Jenner!Originally Posted by monet
They put another Man on the cover too.
Kim Petras Is Second Trans Model on Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Cover (PUKE)
Third if you count Martha Stewart.
https://twitter.com/#!/x/status/1658106205976371200
Originally Posted by monetSame Difference.Originally Posted by jbjbCould have been worse. Could have been Mr./Mrs Jenner!Originally Posted by monet
They put another Man on the cover too.
Kim Petras Is Second Trans Model on Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Cover (PUKE)
Third if you count Martha Stewart.
https://twitter.com/#!/x/status/1658106205976371200
Christ, when I was a kid Sports Illustrated swim suit edition was what you beat it to if you couldn’t access a Playboy.
Now if you have to hurl instead of sticking your fingers down your throat you can use it for that.
Well, I promised that I would be back for the next forum-member death. Perhaps, old Doily just set the table, say, as an honorary member.Originally Posted by OppsIdidItAgain
Looks like you might have misspelled the name of your sock puppet, "Opps."
Shouldn't it be with two O's, not two P's, i.e. "OopsiIDidItAgain?"
What, Me Worry?
Bill, why did you abandon your Grim Reaper alias ? Or at least, I am assuming you did, since you have never used a previous alias once you have created and used a new one if I remember correctly.Originally Posted by OppsIdidItAgainWell, I promised that I would be back for the next forum-member death. Perhaps, old Doily just set the table, say, as an honorary member.Originally Posted by OppsIdidItAgain
I couldn't do another anagram with or without gematria, and, had, thankfully, taken that angle as far as I could. Like the ketchup and fries running out at the same time.
Did a few more of those at the gematria forum, and, then, put up my final file(s) to show how the numerals led me back to the real world. Interestingly, while I was on my way out, someone put up a short video about the Grim Reaper interrupting the coronation, at about the 1:11 mark. So, I interpreted the interruption as the Grim Reaper's passing.
Oh, that Grim Reaper turned out to be a "nothing verger".
Ha. I bet that not even MrV has heard of that word. (You have to give up reality to reach the other side.)
A good spot to finish up my very own latest outing, and, with a bit of gematria to finish off the Reaper stuff.
Firstly, the queen died exactly 911 days after the WHO declared the pandemic. Secondly, there are 345,600 minutes from then to the coronation (end-day not included), and, alternatively, 7152 hours from then to my birthday, 2 July (end-day included). The Reaper's last post here was post #3456 in the thread, and, the Reaper's (randomly assigned) usernumeral there, at the gematria forum, was 7152. Lastly, the Opps of my new username fit in well with KJ's return, and, next, my going on to mention the OPP. So, I guess that I was right to be wrong. The part about letting go of reality to get to the other side.
Special thanks again, Tablepooey, for the bit of junk above. Have you ever studied a math proof to at least know how to begin to fake it?Originally Posted by tableplay
I really thought that after you being you so much, that old Pooey would have told you the same as me. Nothing like getting the "rug" pulled out from underneath, one more time.Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Now it's back to the attic for me to get something done. However, it takes less and less time to truly sort things out.
The magic of music is to make any instrument sound great. What a forum to thus achieve satisfaction, despite the clowns, and other miserable losers. I found the numeral, 78230, in nature, given that the time of my final post was 7:08, and, its spot #304=(2^2+300)-->230. And, by the sizes of the little, images: 7.8KB, and, 4.8KB=(2^4X0.30)-->230; p<[1/(5X050X5)^2]. (300/4)=75; (16-0.3)=15.7-->1/57-->75. (296/53.333...)=5.55. (1200/16.3)-->[10X7+2+1].[6][196√91][9][183]; (1200X16.3)-->[1961-7+2].
Daft post...as always.
Irreplaceable.
What, Me Worry?
A formula for estimating a value is not a proof retard.Originally Posted by OppsIdidItAgain
V, the above analysis is quite sound, on all points.
Say, even had old Pooey properly and fully interpreted the nature of the math question, he ended by throwing in the condition that the number of occurrences of each ticket was to be factored in, by averaging out all of the occurrences. Then the relatively very few larger number of occurrences would become quite meaningless. As well, what to do with the unknown tickets, which weren't drawn? Ie, how many tickets must have been in the drum to account for a few, some, or many, of them not having been drawn? A lot. Right? Obviously, Pooey didn't even bother to fully calculate things in his example. He must have just hoped that I couldn't decipher it. Fooled him. Right? Furthermore, where it possible to simulate the thing, old AIQ would've already done it. But, the problem with thus proceeding to reverse engineer something is that there are often many different types and degrees of scenarios that could lead to the same, or different, outcomes. If, say, character profiling of serial murderers were so simple, then all of that would have long since ceased. On the other hand, every one's a self-professed expert, like you, but, in the end, it's still all a bunch of bull garbage. Mostly, people who never figured out even themselves. The best FBI agents, by directly questioning a suspect, can detect a lie only about 53%, or 54%, of the time.
So, now's YOUR chance to try to prove me wrong, on anything that I wrote. Big boy up, or, slink away, yet again. But this time it's not a matter of submitting other than my post above. Ingest another load of pot to try to truly defend yourself for once. Shouldn't be too very hard against an attic dweller like me. Ha.
What if you're the somewhat functionally illiterate brain-damaged nutjob in a seemingly endless online tiff with Tasha, Singer et al, and me?
Last edited by OppsIdidItAgain; 05-18-2023 at 07:12 PM.
The magic of music is to make any instrument sound great. What a forum to thus achieve satisfaction, despite the clowns, and other miserable losers. I found the numeral, 78230, in nature, given that the time of my final post was 7:08, and, its spot #304=(2^2+300)-->230. And, by the sizes of the little, images: 7.8KB, and, 4.8KB=(2^4X0.30)-->230; p<[1/(5X050X5)^2]. (300/4)=75; (16-0.3)=15.7-->1/57-->75. (296/53.333...)=5.55. (1200/16.3)-->[10X7+2+1].[6][196√91][9][183]; (1200X16.3)-->[1961-7+2].
A solution isn't a proof? A proof necessarily has to be complete or generalized?Originally Posted by tableplay
Arguing with you is totally pointless. As if you think that you win by throwing mud against the barn door. Actually, the same thing from "father" Monet.
Maybe, old V can do better than KJ, and Redietz, too.
Come on, V, are you such a pussy? Can you still hear yourself talking? I own you, you motherfucker.
Last edited by OppsIdidItAgain; 05-18-2023 at 07:19 PM.
The magic of music is to make any instrument sound great. What a forum to thus achieve satisfaction, despite the clowns, and other miserable losers. I found the numeral, 78230, in nature, given that the time of my final post was 7:08, and, its spot #304=(2^2+300)-->230. And, by the sizes of the little, images: 7.8KB, and, 4.8KB=(2^4X0.30)-->230; p<[1/(5X050X5)^2]. (300/4)=75; (16-0.3)=15.7-->1/57-->75. (296/53.333...)=5.55. (1200/16.3)-->[10X7+2+1].[6][196√91][9][183]; (1200X16.3)-->[1961-7+2].
Another two daft posts.
The Old Boy is on a roll.
What, Me Worry?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote