kewlJ

[accountinquestion]

Found these photos of FraudJ, from his childhood, showing the world who was victimizing and oppressing him even way back then.....RIP

I can just hear him screaming out ... moooom mooom help me..

He is kinda like that boy from Harold and Maude .. lmao.

A seriously great movie. The first scene has Kewl pegged along with his mother's reaction.

[accountinquestion]

This movie came out during the folk craze so music is lol but movie is fantastic. Jump to 1:30 to see Kewls childhood.

[MDawg]

UNKewlJ is in a depressed state and can't bring himself to get up out of his underground sewer crib. A manic phase will ensue inevitably, and he'll be back spouting SChiZoPHreNiC UNKewl PYsCHo babble again, no doubt.

[MDawg]

Found these photos of FraudJ, from his childhood, showing the world who was victimizing and oppressing him even way back then.....RIP

I can just hear him screaming out ... moooom mooom help me..

He is kinda like that boy from Harold and Maude .. lmao.

A seriously great movie. The first scene has Kewl pegged along with his mother's reaction.

1) Yes he looked like a Pac Islander from the getgo, even as an infink.

2) Yes like Harold, UNKewLyingJ also could not die even after dying. He returned to lie some more.

[jbjb]

Found these photos of FraudJ, from his childhood, showing the world who was victimizing and oppressing him even way back then.....RIP

I can just hear him screaming out ... moooom mooom help me..

He is kinda like that boy from Harold and Maude .. lmao.

A seriously great movie. The first scene has Kewl pegged along with his mother's reaction.

1) Yes he looked like a Pac Islander from the getgo, even as an infink.

Better that than the disgusting, big nosed Arab camel fucker you are!

[MDawg]

At least I have a decent pair of shoes! Go find yourself a pair at Good Will next time you stray into High Limit trying to borrow chips off me, you won't look so out of place.

And I'm not talking about these from Balenciaga! the

frayed sneakers

you wore that day made these look like haute couture.

Balenciaga's 'Distressed' Sneakers Inspire Line of Shoes Actually Worn by the Homeless
Salvation Army's footwear is 'truly destroyed'

[MDawg]

This statement someone made today at WOV, could have just as easily applied to UNKewlJ.



I think it is more an attention-seeking personality disorder. Based on the number of threads she starts and the number of thumb-tacked posts UNKewlJ always has to be the center of attention.

your a whiny emotionally unstable attention whore.

[kewlJ]

I see your obsession with me has carried on into a new year.

The only real question is why someone who claims to be as wealthy as you do, and claims to have won millions from casinos on top of that, is so obsessed and threatened by/with a mid level advantage player making a living via fairly elementary advantage play techniques?

I am sure everyone has figured that out for themselves.

[soxfan]

Gotta say, I never understood why the kewl-J and his kid brother never counts card as a team, instead of individually when it would benefit them both to count in tandem, hey hey!!!!

[MDawg]

Neither of them plays much at all, assuming "baby bro" even exists.

UNKewlJ is a male prostitute who plays a lil blackjack as cover for his hustling is all.

[kewlJ]

Gotta say, I never understood why the kewl-J and his kid brother never counts card as a team, instead of individually when it would benefit them both to count in tandem, hey hey!!!!

Soxfan, you once said that you used to play on a card counting team. I don't know whether that is true, or if it is at what level that may have been. Frankly when I looked through some of your posts, all I really see is a bunch of gambling voodoo nonsense about baccarat play and shit like that. BUT, maybe you did, play some blackjack on a team at some point in the past.

BUT, that big player call in approach has long run it's course. That approach was invented (or credited to) Al Francesco in the 1970, long before even Kenny Uston used it. And the MIT team and movies and books alerted everyone, even non blackjack players to the concept. Casinos look for that now. They have the technology to quickly look and see who is at the table when a new bigger bettor sits down. They will spot if a player happens to be there each time. To employ this now, a team would need many players so that the same spotter and "big player" don't play together a second time at any casino.

In short, it is just a technique that has run it's course.....is too known. Now that said, my partner and I used to play my own variation of the big player call in when we were out of town. It was a little different, but I am not going to rehash that. It was too risky for me to play in my regular local rotation of casinos.

My brother and I were partners, his first year of playing for a living. But we didn't use the big player approach. We played the EMFH type partnership, where players play separately, but combine results. The benefits of this are that the two players get to the long run faster than either separately would, so it smooths out variance, making a significantly above (or below) expectation year less likely.

After that first year my brother didn't want to partner anymore. He likes doing his own thing, not answering to anyone and his results only effecting himself. And I respect that.

[MDawg]

The longer the UNKewl post, the more lies it contains.

And of course, there will be some regurgitation of theory he pulled from somewhere or other blah blah blah as he tries to make it seem like he has actually played and not just read about it.


UNKewlJ has gotten to the pitiful point where he cries over being picked on, and wonders why anyone would bother picking on such a helpless person in the first place.

Poor poor KJ. Always the victim.

[soxfan]

The team lay thing still works. If two cats are playin tandem then neither will have to reveal the meat of their bets-spread but playin individual yer both havin to reveal the bets-spread. And ultimately, I think a cat seeking longevity will have to spread his play around the whole country and not just a single town, even Vegas, hey hey.

[Treeshade]

Gotta say, I never understood why the kewl-J and his kid brother never counts card as a team, instead of individually when it would benefit them both to count in tandem, hey hey!!!!

Soxfan, you once said that you used to play on a card counting team. I don't know whether that is true, or if it is at what level that may have been. Frankly when I looked through some of your posts, all I really see is a bunch of gambling voodoo nonsense about baccarat play and shit like that. BUT, maybe you did, play some blackjack on a team at some point in the past.

BUT, that big player call in approach has long run it's course. That approach was invented (or credited to) Al Francesco in the 1970, long before even Kenny Uston used it. And the MIT team and movies and books alerted everyone, even non blackjack players to the concept. Casinos look for that now. They have the technology to quickly look and see who is at the table when a new bigger bettor sits down. They will spot if a player happens to be there each time. To employ this now, a team would need many players so that the same spotter and "big player" don't play together a second time at any casino.

In short, it is just a technique that has run it's course.....is too known. Now that said, my partner and I used to play my own variation of the big player call in when we were out of town. It was a little different, but I am not going to rehash that. It was too risky for me to play in my regular local rotation of casinos.

My brother and I were partners, his first year of playing for a living. But we didn't use the big player approach. We played the EMFH type partnership, where players play separately, but combine results. The benefits of this are that the two players get to the long run faster than either separately would, so it smooths out variance, making a significantly above (or below) expectation year less likely.

After that first year my brother didn't want to partner anymore. He likes doing his own thing, not answering to anyone and his results only effecting himself. And I respect that.

Is this around the time you started having the childhood friend of your brother shove his cock deep in your guts you pervert. Imagine grooming these poor kids waiting for years to live out this sick fantasy. GroomJ the terrible

[jdog]

If two cats are playin tandem then neither will have to reveal the meat of their bets-spread

I think that makes sense. The issue is it's always the same two guys playing together, of course it should be harder to detect.

[kewlJ]

Two card counters at the same table, raising and lower bets in unison is very bad. It is extremely easy to spot. Even if they are playing different counts and different bet spreads, the raising and lowering together is a major red flag.

For this reason it was always an unwritten rule that the second counter to the table would immediately exit once they realized the situation (you don't always know when you sit down, until the count goes positive, and both start raising wagers). Of late sometimes the second counter no longer observes that unwritten rule or courtesy, putting both in danger.

I know solo type card counters that were "linked" to other counters and teams in databases, simply because they were at the same table.

If you are a solo type card counter in it for longevity, it just isn't worth it.

[MDawg]

"I know solo type card counters that were 'linked' to other counters and teams in databases"

There is a clear trend that has developed now. All of KewlJ's implied associates are turning out to be other invented characters in his years of lies. ...RIP

The longer the UNKewl post, the more lies it contains.

And of course, there will be some regurgitation of theory he pulled from somewhere or other blah blah blah as he tries to make it seem like he has actually played and not just read about it.


UNKewlJ has gotten to the pitiful point where he cries over being picked on, and wonders why anyone would bother picking on such a helpless person in the first place.

Poor poor KJ. Always the victim.

[Treeshade]

Two card counters at the same table, raising and lower bets in unison is very bad. It is extremely easy to spot. Even if they are playing different counts and different bet spreads, the raising and lowering together is a major red flag.

For this reason it was always an unwritten rule that the second counter to the table would immediately exit once they realized the situation (you don't always know when you sit down, until the count goes positive, and both start raising wagers). Of late sometimes the second counter no longer observes that unwritten rule or courtesy, putting both in danger.

I know solo type card counters that were "linked" to other counters and teams in databases, simply because they were at the same table.

If you are a solo type card counter in it for longevity, it just isn't worth it.

When you post things like this everyone who actually runs teams (profitable) playing much higher then you claim here just laugh. Sox was trying to wise you up some, but you just don’t understand much. Your not a practitioner just a forum guy

[kewlJ]

When you post things like this everyone who actually runs teams (profitable) playing much higher then you claim here just laugh. Sox was trying to wise you up some, but you just don’t understand much. Your not a practitioner just a forum guy

Complete bullshit! Soxfan hasn't demonstrated that he knows much about card counting and his voodoo gambling comments about theories that he has posted at Gambling Forums makes it unlikely has ever won at anything. When these guys start talking about winning at Baccarat and roulette and progression wagering, they are almost always losing degenerate type gamblers. And frankly Seedvalue, YOU endorsing this kind of voodoo nonsense, doesn't say much about you and your knowledge of card counting. It puts you in the category of just another one of these haters willing to endorse anything, even complete nonsense, hoping to discredit me. You just can't accept that I know what I am talking about via blackjack card counting based on 20 years experience and networking with a number of long-time professional players.

Two card counters playing the same table raising and lowering bets in unison will put both on the fast track to running bootcamps or writing books or whatever they intend to do post blackjack career. Even the well known call-in, big player approach didn't result in two players sitting there raising wagers in unison. The spotter would exit shortly after calling in the big players, just so they weren't doing so.

There is one very unique scenario that 2 card counters could play the same table and get away with it. And that is a profitable side bet that requires a specialized count. One player would count regularly while the second would count the specialized count for the side bet. These players would not be raising their bets in unison (one likely flatbetting) and might get away with it at least for a while.

Look, blackjack card counting isn't like some of the machine plays you guys specialize in. There are several different levels of casino personnel with eyes on any blackjack player betting larger amounts. Yes, there are higher roller, higher limit players that bet thousands of dollars, but they are watched closely to make sure that they aren't spreading and counting cards. Anyone claiming they count cards and spread to a max bet greater than about $1000 or $2000 at the most, for any length of time is full of shit. A player can wager $5000 or $10,000 but they can NOT spread to that.

The only way to achieve some longevity with blackjack card counting is to identify and play limits that are better tolerated and play shorter session, so as to minimize the number of large winning sessions, and generally not make a nuisance of yourself. It isn't about tricking anyone....those days are long gone, it is about being tolerated. And that is exactly why there are so few pure card counters left (except at recreational lower limits).

[kewlJ]

This is just like Singer and the late Alan Mendelson. Both admitted they didn't play or know much about blackjack, and yet both fought me on everything I said, throwing all kinds of nonsense at the wall, hoping something sticks. ridiculous.