kewlJ

[MDawg]

MrV, you noted that KJ was a useful source of blackjack information. Can you name three things that you thus learned from him? Just curious.

I can try, but as I don't play the game my interest was purely casual.

1. The notion of counting two tables

2. The benefit of playing short sessions to avoid detection

3. Possibility of gaffed automatic shufflers

Amazing. He picked three that actually support that UNKewlJ doesn't play at all.

Then again, I guess they didn't have ready LexisNexis access when you practiced, was it that long ago? or have you just fallen out of practice with getting to the bottom of things that badly.

His mentioning those three shore did bring out the 10x multiplier responses though!

KJ keeps trying to manually rephrase the same old nervous essays over and over. Can you imagine how much time and angst that takes?

[Half Smoke]

I can try, but as I don't play the game my interest was purely casual.

1. The notion of counting two tables

2. The benefit of playing short sessions to avoid detection

3. Possibility of gaffed automatic shufflers

Amazing. He picked three that actually support that UNKewlJ doesn't play at all.

#2. - the benefit of playing short sessions to avoid detection is 100% correct


anybody who is not aware of that is simply not a pro BJ player



# 3 that he named I am less familiar with than him and I don't care to comment on


#1 - counting down 2 tables is surely possible - but very difficult - iirc it's mentioned in pro BJ literature - when I played I would take a look quickly at 2 different tables - but only at the beginning of a shoe - if one of the tables had a many more low cards than high cards come out I would sit down


I wouldn't actually say that I counted down 2 tables at the same time though

.

[MDawg]

This guy hasn't played any cards in years if not decades. Also posted about how he believes he should quit gambling altogether and has an alcohol problem.

And he's very UNKewlJ like in terms of saying that he won't comment any further on something someone says, and then being unable to keep to any resolve.

So - yeah - another winner trying to back up what the

mentally ill redchipper

has to say.

[Half Smoke]

This guy hasn't played any cards in years if not decades. Also posted about how he believes he should quit gambling altogether and has an alcohol problem.

And he's very UNKewlJ like in terms of saying that he won't comment any further on something someone says, and then being unable to keep to any resolve.

I can't comment on his personal life - I don't actually know the guy personally

but you're post is obviously trying to deflect on the fact that you called those 3 things about BJ false and I know for a fact that at least 2 of them are not false

you may think that the point of the post was to criticize you - but it wasn't - the point of the post was to have accurate info about the game of BJ posted on this forum

.

[MDawg]

Two guys who don't play cards are commenting on what they pulled from the archives....

Between you and UNKewlJ I'm the only one who is actually playing.

[Rob.Singer]

What kew conveniently leaves out of his continuing lie about his concocted "pro bj life" is how axel corrected himself several times in comments about kew's "believability". LIKELY FABRICATIONS emerged as the key phrase as more facts were carved out of kew.

Certainly, the typical degenerate gambler who moves to LV dreaming to make the casinos their personal ATM's, reads up on and plays very low level blackjack. Thus, the initial deception of experienced AP's....the easy bamboozle of a confused pothead like MrV. They also camp out at the nickel poker machines for as long as their 20's hold out. So V, if you still feel enthralled with kew's bs gambling CV ---- HAVE ANOTHER BOWL!

[Half Smoke]

Two guys who don't play cards are commenting on what they pulled from the archives....

Between you and UNKewlJ I'm the only one who is actually playing.

you're right I don't play anymore - but I've put in thousands of hours at BJ tables in my past - and I know the game backwards and forwards - don't need any archives

I gamble very little right now - just some on sports and horses

I mainly enjoy tracking and analyzing sporting events

I'm so glad I don't gamble much anymore___________________made money but lost enjoyment with all the hours I put into it - made so much more in the markets

without heavy gambling my life is so much more enjoyable -

.

[Half Smoke]

has an alcohol problem[/URL].

MDawg - I don't know why you put out false info such as this

I never stated that I have an alcohol problem and I don't have one

I did get drunk one day and made a horrible post at WoV for which I apologized

getting drunk once in a blue moon does not make a person an alcoholic

I'm don't know why you would make a false accusation about me -

for the record I normally have one drink per week - on Saturday - it's a double - that's it - as if there's anybody out there that cares

.

[Rob.Singer]

has an alcohol problem[/URL].

MDawg - I don't know why you put out false info such as this

I never stated that I have an alcohol problem and I don't have one

I did get drunk one day and made a horrible post at WoV for which I apologized

getting drunk once in a blue moon does not make a person an alcoholic

I'm don't know why you would make a false accusation about me -

for the record I normally have one drink per week - on Saturday - it's a double - that's it - as if there's anybody out there that cares

.

I care.

Depending on your size, Harvard did a study in the 70's that showed for a 200lb. guy like myself, two drinks a day is better for you than one drink a day, which is better than no drinks a day. I've tried to keep to that doctrine and I'd say it's pretty accurate. I'm 74 and I'm in better shape and health than most people half my age--which isnt difficult these days with all the soft millenial fatties we have to look at everywhere. Of course eating right, staying active, and common sense living have much to do with that.

Kew's mention about avoiding detection by playing short sessions is something every aspiring bj counter--whether successful or a failure like kew--figures out in their 1st month of play. His "count 2 tables" nonsense was stolen from reading other bj forums. No one--especially his dumb ass--does that, because it's just a stupid theory put out there to impress others. And he's been taken out to the woodshed here more than once about his shufflers baloney.

[MDawg]

halfsmoke, it was not an ad hominen attack. Per se. But background that both you and UNKewlJ don’t play any cards, is relevant, no? It implies that you’re lifting information from other sources to present an answer the same way UNKewlJ has been proven to do the same. At a minimum you are completely out of touch with anything going on anywhere near recently (same as AWolf).

As well, your saying “you want out” from gambling entirely, implies that it’s not working out for you, which it’s admirable that you realize that and decided to quit, but again, someone who quit cards maybe decades ago and then quit everything more recently, how can someone like that be a credible or relevant source to analyze the statements of UNKewlJ, especially given that UNKewlJ's a proven liar?

And questioning whether or not you were sober at the time you made this post, is certainly relevant too. And now it’s coming up on Saturday, so the timing of your weekly double shot could matter, no? especially if it turns into many double shots like it did that recent Saturday the 26th.

In any case the UNKewl shuffler lie has been debunked many times over by anyone who cared to look into it. Short sessions – the only documented play we have with UNKewlJ involves red and green chip play as cover for his male hustling, so his claiming that he darts in and out while playing at that minute level is laughable. For this particular debunked player, claiming to play short sessions is further proof of fabrication. He could stay at the tables all day long playing red and green chips and no one would care.

And the nonsense about viewing multiple tables was another exercise in lying UNKewlJ lifted from elsewhere, even when questioned about it he never went so far as to even name anyplace where he has ever done this but rather resorted, as usual, to trying to quote sources. The ridiculousness of someone who tries so hard to tell us exactly where he lives but won't name any pit where this double table view might work, is clear.

This is why MickeyCrimm said: He'd rather climb to the top of a tree just to tell a lie than stand on the ground and tell the truth.

UNKewlJ follows a regular pattern of spouting nonsense and then when challenged trying to back it up with unverifiable hearsay. Individually they don't mean as much as collectively. Collectively this draws into question his entire projected persona and existence.

[MDawg]

Now will come the SChiZoPHreNiC UNKewl PYsCHo babble, including 10x multiplier responses packed with long-winded, rambling drama-laced "I NEED TO set the record straight or I'll go OUT OF MY MIND!" paragraphs that never seem to satisfy, as he then repeats the same things over and over again complete with "Now I'd like to address..." introductory phrases.

[Gottlob1]

MrV, you noted that KJ was a useful source of blackjack information. Can you name three things that you thus learned from him? Just curious.

I can try, but as I don't play the game my interest was purely casual.

1. The notion of counting two tables

2. The benefit of playing short sessions to avoid detection

3. Possibility of gaffed automatic shufflers

Fair enough.

I think that the benefit of playing short sessions, whatever the size of the bet, is countered by then having to play more sessions (to make the same amount of money) which amounts to the same amount of play, and hence the same exposure to detection. KJ claimed to hit about thirty casinos a day so that neither caught on. But, if MDawg worked his canned posts down to thirty, wouldn't even KJ catch on? Gaffed shufflers would deter blackjack players from playing at all. And, watching, and moving between, two tables, at just the right times, may give up more exposure to detection than it's worth, especially if, most of the time, one table is as good, or bad, as the other, or, the other table is worse.


Gottlob1 Gottlob1 is online now
Gold
Gottlob1's AvatarJoin Date
Jul 2023
Posts
341

[Half Smoke]

As well, your saying “you want out” from gambling entirely, implies that it’s not working out for you,

and now it’s coming up on Saturday, so the timing of your weekly double shot could matter, no? especially if it turns into many double shots like it did that recent Saturday the 26th.

to be clear, I quit gambling not because I was losing but because I lost enjoyment of it - without saying so directly you seemed to imply that I was losing

when I played intensely for many years, I was a winner every single year at BJ - I played one day every single week for about 14 hours straight breaking only to throw down some food

in A.C. you could just walk down the Boardwalk and there were iirc about 9 casinos that enabled you not to stay in one for too long - that part was easy

at the time they had rules that prohibited barring but they could hassle you in various ways - I was hassled just a few times

I had to drive about 8 hours round trip - to A.C. & back - took a nap in my car before driving back - didn't want comps that could get me a hotel room - didn't wanna play rated and let them know who I was - they never knew - didn't wanna move there - liked it better where I lived

you brought up alcohol again - my double shots never turn into many double shots - one double shot and I'm feeling no pain - don't need any more - happened to post that one time exactly when it hit me - I hadn't eaten in several hours - usually just chillin with the TV or watching sports on YT - it was an exception, I regret it - and it won't happen again

because I only drink one day a week a double shot has a strong effect - if I had 2 drinks per day as Rob indicated he does it would be nothing


.

[MisterV]

MDawg - I don't know why you put out false info such as this.

That's a question I'd like the dawg to answer as well: what induces him to lie about his exploits and to make a litany of false claims against any who question or criticize him?

When we were kids we dealt with people like that by not playing with them; many here and on other forums have adopted that strategy as they simply ignore this braggadocio fool.

There are many different types of folks on this earth, and as the dawg clearly demonstrates not all of us are playing the game fairly, honestly, and ethically.

And this schmuck says he's a lawyer?

[MDawg]

H.Smoke said that he was drunk the day he made that post at WOV. Now he says it was just his usual double shot but that he hadn't eaten, and that because he drinks every week it affects him greatly. In any case, obviously gambling didn't work out for him, because who quits something that is not a problem? and in any case his first hand knowledge about any of this is based on the very distant past and doesn't take into account the verified fact that UNKewlJ just plays red/green, and as verified by others, does this as cover for male hustling.

I am sure too that there are times when V is less coherent than usual because he took too much Xanax or alcohol or pot or psychedelics or whatever other drugs he has mentioned frequently he keeps stocked up.

As far as UNKewLyingJ, no one here believes anything much he has to say. V might pretend to back him for sake of creating strife and what he views as enjoyable divisiveness, but no one with any sense believes him about anything much. It's not even that he cried wolf too many times (he did), or was caught lying too many times (that too), but that the overwhelming contradictions and hypocrisy in his posts just make you laugh.

No one should take your advice regarding blackjack, because you haven’t proven to be an expert. Literally they should do the opposite of what you say. I’m not your sweetheart either

[MisterV]

I am sure too that there are times when V is less coherent than usual because he took too much Xanax or alcohol or pot or psychedelics or whatever other drugs he has mentioned frequently he keeps stocked up.

Case...in...point.

The dawg is lying through his foaming muzzle.

He tries to undermine my credibility by claiming that I frequently mention being stocked up with Xanax, alcohol, pot and psychedelics: THAT"S A LIE.

Of the four things claimed, it is only true that yes, I smoke pot and keep it on hand; I've no concern about pot having negatively affected me, as I've smoked since I was a teen yet I've managed to practice law for 40 years and retire "very comfortably," without having been sued for malpractice or having a bar complaint filed and deemed founded.

I never took Xanax, and never mentioned it on any forum.

I have not consumed psychedelics since college except I did try mushrooms once after moving west decades ago.

I have not drank alcohol since the late-nineties.

These facts have been mentioned by me before, and I am certain the dawg was participating on these boards when I posted about them, yet while armed with the truth he chooses to lie, to invent shit to suit his fictional narrative.

Sort of like his bullshitting about buying a seven figure mansion in sin city, or winning fifty hands in a row.

The guy is simply not genuine, not believable, and is addicted both to gambling and prevarication.

His is a "classic case" of him trying to atone for perceived weakness by projecting an image of strength.

Alas, this "emperor" has neither clothes nor a clue...

[MDawg]

V, you've depended on drugs and alcohol all your life. Because you're an addict-alcoholic.

People who aren't addicted don't need drugs (alcohol is a drug too) to get through their lives the way you do.

At the root of addiction is low self esteem coupled with inflated ego - that's you to a T!

We've been through all this before, and denial is another attribute of addiction.

[MisterV]

Don't try to dodge the point I proved, Dawg.

You lied about Xanax, psychedelics and alcohol.

Whether or not I am an addict is not the point, but if I am it certainly is under control.

I smoke pot, but typically late at night before bed, or when playing ladder ball in my back yard with a buddy.

"low self esteem coupled with inflated ego:" pot --> kettle --> black?

I will always deny false claims made against me.

[kewlJ]

has an alcohol problem[/URL].

MDawg - I don't know why you put out false info such as this

Half Smoke, THIS is all Mdawg does now. Anybody that expresses any doubt about his far fetched claims, or anybody that says anything even remotely positive about me, even something as mild as agreeing with some blackjack knowledge that I have shared, Mdawg will immediately attack and try to discredit. This is a lawyer tactic, where the lawyer tried everything he can to discredit and smear a witness that is saying anything harmful about his client.

Unfortunately, here at VCT, we are way past the truth mattering. If the truth mattered, anyone who ever counted cards seriously, or even knows about counting cards, like Maxpen and a few others would come out and say, "yeah KJ is very knowledgeable about card counting and the techniques he describes work". But people can no longer do that. It is now about taking sides, and fuck the truth.

So instead, we get people like Rob Singer and Mdawg who obviously know shit about what it takes to succeed at card counting repeating their ignorant babble.

The things I know and used to share (don't do much of that anymore on this forum) are things a player learned from experience, not from looking shit up on the internet like Mdawg has admitted he does. Anybody that knows anything about blackjack and gambling in Las Vegas recognizes that. The haters who just have to hate and lie, no matter what...well not so much.

[kewlJ]

MDawg - I don't know why you put out false info such as this.

That's a question I'd like the dawg to answer as well: what induces him to lie about his exploits and to make a litany of false claims against any who question or criticize him?

When we were kids we dealt with people like that by not playing with them; many here and on other forums have adopted that strategy as they simply ignore this braggadocio fool.

There are many different types of folks on this earth, and as the dawg clearly demonstrates not all of us are playing the game fairly, honestly, and ethically.

And this schmuck says he's a lawyer?

Excellent Post MrV. Your first question is a question many people on several forums would like an answer to, but will never get one.

I think the second question on everyone's mind is something Druff has even asked. Why did he have to lie about all the winning bullshit. Why was it not enough to share his experiences of a higher level gambler, playing higher level stakes, winning and losing, losing more than he wins in the long run, run receiving higher end comps that to him, make his play worthwhile? Why was that not enough for him. People would have admired that and him if he had done that.