Pulling Player's Club Card out when a Jackpot is hit?

[kewlJ]

He can't help himself! He's the ultimate attention whore. He's the poster boy for any attention ( mostly negative) is good attention. I also suspect he's trying desperately before the end of the year to surpass his biggest nemesis, who pulverizes him on the regular! UNKOOL wants to beat him at something Come on Rob, wise up and don't let this snot nosed twit win!

Ozzy Nelson, you care about the absolute stupidest things that not a single person in their right mind cares about or thinks is important like posts counts, or who you perceive to be winning a troll war, getting in the best insults.

The only thing that really matters on these forums is who knows what they are talking about and who is just talking and I proved that long ago with Singer. When it comes to gambling he really knows and understands very little and what he does is voodoo/ploppy/degen gambler stuff.

I guess the other thing that matters a little bit is who has won what. I generally don't feel like I am competing with anyone else, so I avoid these pissing contests, but the fact is your hero Ron Singer is no doubt a life-long losing player. He has lost far more than he has won at casinos. So I topped him in winnings 20 years ago in 2004, my first year of playing blackjack for a living when I made a measley 11 grand playing red chip. Hell I beat him in my first month of playing.

[Ozzy]

He can't help himself! He's the ultimate attention whore. He's the poster boy for any attention ( mostly negative) is good attention. I also suspect he's trying desperately before the end of the year to surpass his biggest nemesis, who pulverizes him on the regular! UNKOOL wants to beat him at something Come on Rob, wise up and don't let this snot nosed twit win!

Ozzy Nelson, you care about the absolute stupidest things that not a single person in their right mind cares about or thinks is important like posts counts, or who you perceive to be winning a troll war, getting in the best insults.

The only thing that really matters on these forums is who knows what they are talking about and who is just talking and I proved that long ago with Singer. When it comes to gambling he really knows and understands very little and what he does is voodoo/ploppy/degen gambler stuff.

I guess the other thing that matters a little bit is who has won what. I generally don't feel like I am competing with anyone else, so I avoid these pissing contests, but the fact is your hero Ron Singer is no doubt a life-long losing player. He has lost far more than he has won at casinos. So I topped him in winnings 20 years ago in 2004, my first year of playing blackjack for a living when I made a measley 11 grand playing red chip. Hell I beat him in my first month of playing.

I could care less about who is or not a successful AP on these forums .I know with 99.95% certainty who plays with an edge overall( rated skill level) and the civilians on these boards. Of course there are the ones somewhere in the middle( evenish types). I care a hell of a lot more about comedic interesting pot stirrers then any UNKOOL poster.

[accountinquestion]

This guy kewl seems to be lying now more than ever. He gets so little. IRS wanted table numbers... for what? Huh? To waste his time or theirs?

Now he is constantly listing is betting record as if anyone here cares. Also because he is on some mission to math prove us. Just awful. Clearly a human who desires every bit of attention he can muster. None of the regular posters even give a shit. So so insufferable.

[kewlJ]

This guy kewl seems to be lying now more than ever. He gets so little. IRS wanted table numbers... for what? Huh? To waste his time or theirs?

You are lying again!! Show me where I ever said the IRS requires or wanted this or that? I have no idea what the IRS requires or wants. I haven't had a conversation with the IRS. My tax guy said the log or record of play should contain machine and table numbers played as well as dates, and amounts.

If you can't be honest in your attempt to discredit me, just fuck off you peice of shit!

[accountinquestion]

This guy kewl seems to be lying now more than ever. He gets so little. IRS wanted table numbers... for what? Huh? To waste his time or theirs?

You are lying again!! Show me where I ever said the IRS requires or wanted this or that? I have no idea what the IRS requires or wants. I haven't had a conversation with the IRS. My tax guy said the log or record of play should contain machine and table numbers played as well as dates, and amounts.

If you can't be honest in your attempt to discredit me, just fuck off you peice of shit!

"lying again" lol you can't make this up.

Look, you talked about your tax guy wanting you to update some documentation. You then said you "updated the logs". Then in the next paragraph you talk about the numbers being on the BJ tables. There is a strong implication there that your tax guy told you that you needed the numbers. I believe you even stated you didn't know they were there. Then who told you to go do it? And why did he tell you this if the IRS didn't want it?

[MDawg]

As far as this latest lie about his filing as a professional gambler,

Maybe I can step in here and help,

It Never Happened.

You're welcome....

[jdog]

Thanks to MrV here are the complete IRS guidelines from that link. I think everyone here should read it in it's entirety.


Gambling Losses Up to the Amount of Gambling Winnings
You must report the full amount of your gambling winnings
for the year on your Schedule 1 (Form 1040). You deduct
your gambling losses for the year on your Schedule A
(Form 1040). Gambling losses include the actual cost of
wagers plus expenses incurred in connection with the
conduct of the gambling activity, such as travel to and
from a casino. You can't deduct gambling losses that are
more than your winnings. Generally, nonresident aliens
can't deduct gambling losses on your Schedule A (Form
1040-NR).
You can't reduce your gambling winnings by your
gambling losses and report the difference. You
must report the full amount of your winnings as in-
come and claim your losses (up to the amount of win-
nings) as an itemized deduction. Therefore, your records
should show your winnings separately from your losses.

Diary of winnings and losses. You must keep
an accurate diary or similar record of your losses
and winnings. Your diary should contain at least the following
information.
• The date and type of your specific wager or wagering
activity.
• The name and address or location of the gambling es-
tablishment.
• The names of other persons present with you at the
gambling establishment.
• The amount(s) you won or lost.

Proof of winnings and losses. In addition to your diary,
you should also have other documentation. You can gen-
erally prove your winnings and losses through Form
W-2G, Certain Gambling Winnings; Form 5754, State-
ment by Person(s) Receiving Gambling Winnings; wager-
ing tickets; canceled checks; substitute checks; credit re-
cords; bank withdrawals; and statements of actual
winnings or payment slips provided to you by the gam-
bling establishment.
For specific wagering transactions, you can use the fol-
lowing items to support your winnings and losses.
These recordkeeping suggestions are intended
as general guidelines to help you establish your
winnings and losses. They aren't all-inclusive.
Your tax liability depends on your particular facts and cir-
cumstances.

Keno. Copies of the keno tickets you purchased that
were validated by the gambling establishment, copies of
your casino credit records, and copies of your casino
check-cashing records.

Slot machines. A record of the machine number and
all winnings by date and time the machine was played.

Table games (twenty-one (blackjack), craps,
poker, baccarat, roulette, wheel of fortune, etc.). The
number of the table at which you were playing. Casino
credit card data indicating whether the credit was issued
in the pit or at the cashier's cage.

Bingo. A record of the number of games played, cost
of tickets purchased, and amounts collected on winning
tickets. Supplemental records include any receipts from
the casino, parlor, etc.

Racing (horse, harness, dog, etc.). A record of the
races, amounts of wagers, amounts collected on winning
tickets, and amounts lost on losing tickets. Supplemental
records include unredeemed tickets and payment records
from the racetrack.

Lotteries. A record of ticket purchases, dates, win-
nings, and losses. Supplemental records include unre-
deemed tickets, payment slips, and winnings statements.

[kewlJ]

This guy kewl seems to be lying now more than ever. He gets so little. IRS wanted table numbers... for what? Huh? To waste his time or theirs?

You are lying again!! Show me where I ever said the IRS requires or wanted this or that? I have no idea what the IRS requires or wants. I haven't had a conversation with the IRS. My tax guy said the log or record of play should contain machine and table numbers played as well as dates, and amounts.

If you can't be honest in your attempt to discredit me, just fuck off you peice of shit!

"lying again" lol you can't make this up.

Look, you talked about your tax guy wanting you to update some documentation. You then said you "updated the logs". Then in the next paragraph you talk about the numbers being on the BJ tables. There is a strong implication there that your tax guy told you that you needed the numbers. I believe you even stated you didn't know they were there. Then who told you to go do it? And why did he tell you this if the IRS didn't want it?

You are implying things that I didn't say. Things that would be illegal.

[MDawg]

Thanks to MrV here are the complete IRS guidelines from that link. I think everyone here should read it in it's entirety.

Yes, and as UNKewLyingJ "studies up" on his fable about playing enough blackjack to even file any of it anywhere on any return, his story should get worn smoother with less inconsistencies and nonsense.

Tell us UNKewlJ, what about the income you receive from the Sugar Daddies you have been observed with by MaxPen, AxelWolf and by others, and all the ones SeedValue's research proves you have hustled, where/how do you report that income? Do you have a separate Schedule C for that

male whore in Pahrump

business, or is it all just unreported income?

[kewlJ]

Tell us UNKewlJ, what about the income you receive from the Sugar Daddies you have been observed with, and all the ones SeedValue's research proves you have hustled, where/how do you report that income? Do you have a separate Schedule C for thatbusiness, or is it all just unreported income?

That is all made up shit by a hater (seedvalue) who knows nothing, not a damn thing about me. And repeated by you many times over.

However, there is a pretty good chance you MDAWG, are the patron that hired a hooker, took her back to his room and was drugged and robbed of a rolex up her coochie. So tell us, do you write that off as business expense?

[MDawg]

I mean the guy's in the process of throwing the memory of his "long-time friend and partner," the 20 year older father-son Oscar Wilde style "love that dare not speak its name" under the bus, because it somehow furthers his end of not seeming like a liar at these forums. MaxPen got close to establishing that UNKewlJ lied about being in the casino database, and so he came back with a new set of lies to try to somehow explain why no one was ever going to find him listed anywhere.

What's crazy though is, just as with the lie about there being a lawsuit, what purpose does it serve? Other than trying to back up lies with more lies. We know he's going to come back with yet another version of the story in a few days, where he says OKAY GUYS, THIS part of the story WAS true, but THIS part, was not.

Remarkable though that he'd either be driven to lie about having a dead partner, or actually have a dead partner and now disavow his existence. Sociopath (with an end game that isn't even worth fighting over) to the extreme.

monet on what a flip flopping liar UNKewlJ is:
It never ends with this guy.
He posts one thing today and a week later tells everyone he was lying.
And does it how many times now?

At this point anyone who thinks FraudJ represents anything truthfully or factually correct is a fool.....RIP

[jbjb]

Anyone with a small amount of smarts can create a completely fake gambling loss log without even having to make one bet and pass it off as being real. And have that amount deducted from any amount owed to the IRS. I'm not suggesting anyone do it, but it can be done

[jdog]

My opinion after reading through all those guidelines remains the same: The IRS is requiring an unreasonable burden of documentation in order to discourage people from reporting gambling losses.

[kewlJ]

Anyone with a small amount of smarts can create a completely fake gambling loss log without even having to make one bet and pass it off as being real. And have that amount deducted from any amount owed to the IRS. I'm not suggesting anyone do it, but it can be done

Of course they can! That is what is so stupid about the IRS policies. they will accept a written log, probably completely manufactured in a couple days prior to any audit or examination (Try not to have all entries in same color ink. ) but they don't accept casino records, even as inaccurate as they can be.

It is just craziness. It is almost like they are saying, if the person goes to this extent to create the log, then....whatever. None of it, like much of the Irs code makes no sense.

[kewlJ]

There is a re-occuring theme on this forum. When I say anything about anything, the haters call me a liar. When something I said is proven true, such as just occurred with Jdog reposting IRS "recommendations", the haters will jump up and down screaming some none sense about how I looked something up or regurgitated information. NEVER, not a single time are these hating trolls man enough to ever apologize and admit they were wrong, in the face of having been proved wrong. These are just small people. But they are haters and trolls, so I guess that is par for the course.

[kewlJ]

What's crazy though is, just as with the lie about there being a lawsuit, what purpose does it serve?

This is something you detectives have never figured out. here is the question: why would I direct people to a lawsuit that didn't exist, that there was no record of, that anyone looking (I didn't think it would be Maxpen though lol) would find no record of, proving that the lawsuit was made up? Why would I do that?

I actually mention the reason once. I am not sure I want to reveal it again, although I believe the danger has passed and the information, no longer accessible. But that is the real question. I know you people think I am an idiot. That is on you. I have outsmarted and stayed ahead of casinos, and related database companies for more than a decade, so I am not as dumb as you people want to think, so the question remains, why would I have done that?

Again, I am probably not going to answer, but that is the question that if any of you great detectives had figured out, you would have understood what was happening.

I will leave you with that as I head out for the day.

[MDawg]

The "what purpose does it serve" refers to your disavowing your gay marriage and existence of your "soul mate."

No explanation is needed for why you lied about the lawsuit. You lied about that, and the settlement funds ACH, and everything else, just to try to to back up the original lie about the backrooming incident. We know exactly what purpose it served to lie about the lawsuit, the purpose was to back up your lies and try to get people to believe your fable. No other reason.

But you can tell he really intended for people to believe it, and was upset when they didn't. That's why we got the indignant responses.

Even your nonsense about it somehow "protecting" you was an easily disproven lie, which you failed to present any cogent story there, because you knew it would make no sense.

In fact, even this story doesn't make sense. He's insisting the backrooming really happened, but just the lawsuit part of it was fake. He said he told that lie in order to protect his privacy. Huh?? How does adding a fake postscript to the story protect your privacy?

How did it protect your privacy to lie there UNKewlJ, how?

I am not going to tell you about the very concerns I didn't want going public to begin with

Ah, well, saying nothing is better than this crap you tried a few minutes ago:

I made up that timeline and lawsuit portion because details of the settlement were about to become known.

Oh so, on a matter where you're worried that the details are about to come out, which you don't even explain why that would matter (including because your latest story is that all this happened a long time ago anyway), you suddenly come to the forums and tell a gaggle of online people about this matter yourself and then make up that there was a lawsuit behind it. But finally tell us that EVERYTHING HAPPENED EXACTLY THE WAY I CLAIMED other than the lawsuit.

And HOW does that prevent the details coming out? Or change anything? How does lying to a group of a dozen people change in any way what was about to become known? When you disclosed it all yourself anyway?

Which, in the end, the reason nothing became known (other than the lies you posted) is because nothing ever happened.

Truly,

You can't get to the truth with a fraud.

[MisterV]

These are just small people. But they are haters and trolls, so I guess that is par for the course.

Why then do you and I choose to tap dance before such an unappreciative audience of disenchanted, disaffected souls?

What, are we left-handed?

Then again, you and I give back as good as we get so I guess at the end of the day ... "IT DON'T MEAN NOTHIN'."

[Gottlob1]

For those who haven’t heard, Washington State just passed two new laws – gay marriage and legalized marijuana. The fact that gay marriage and marijuana were legalized on the same day makes perfect biblical sense because Leviticus 20:13 says “If a man lies with another man they should be stoned.” Evidently, we just hadn’t interpreted it correctly before!

[jdog]

It is almost like they are saying, if the person goes to this extent to create the log, then....whatever.

Well in most cases, this is hopefully what will happen. But what I believe is this code essentially gives the IRS carte blanche. The entries in your logs cannot be fully verified. So if they suspect you are being deceptive then they can ask for anything you don't have (because no one will have everything listed) to make you uncomfortable enough to admit to something. It's the same thing they do in an immigration interview. Even if you bring in 90% of the recommended (not required) documentation, they start telling you they want the stuff you didn't bring just to make you squirm.

Getting you to admit to fabricating losses is really their only move since neither party can fully prove the numbers. Not comfortable with this, I prefer things to be more cut and dried.