(I initially posted this in another thread but decided it needs its own space)
Wizard writes reviews of different games and bets available on different game. And continuing to do so, I believe was part of his agreement to continue on after the sale. What I don't understand is why he needs to out advantage plays when doing this, which he frequently does.
Nothing good can come of that. You aren't helping "gamblers" if that play will be pulled because you have alerted the game makers and casino industry to these vulnerabilities. They have people in their employ that are supposed to find such vulnerabilities. It shouldn't be Wizard doing that for them and for free. It it just an ego thing that Mike does this.... "hey look what I found that no one elese has yet".
Today mike exposed a vulnerability to an electronic game he saw at G2E, that hasn't even hit the casino floor yet. So they can now change it before it ever goes public.
I don't play baccarat so there was little chance I would have discovered this and played it unless someone directly lead me to it, but I just don't get this. Why does Shackleford do this? There are times I think he is actually out to sabatoge APs.