Johnson City Men's Book Club Meeting, Oct 27

[accountinquestion]

I can help with that research, account. Two folks recruited me to facilitate the discussion.

The first has a Ph.D. in sociology and a Harvard law degree. He is retiring this month. I think he generated $200 million in grants to the university.
The second was a Fulbright scholar (at USC) and is on the committee to choose Western Hemisphere Fulbright scholars.

If you like, I can put them in touch with you. Be happy to do so. Drop me a line at Integritysports@aol.com.

LOL. I didn't think so.

You're the same guy who claims Stanford medicine suggests Ivermectin as a "gold standard". They don't and never did. Yet you told me (as a total internet random) should email them to verify.

lol.

Good stuff. Same ol same ol.

Maybe if you work hard you can get a nice freeroll for yourself.

May you can hit a $500 lick to pay off your tax bill.

Actually, this was my error. I did the follow-up. It turns out that the original research was done at Stanford, but Stanford felt it was not conclusive and wanted no part in promoting Ivermectin, for obvious funding reasons. So two of the doctors who did the research resigned and spun it off into their own private company. I should have said, the PREVIOUS lead virologist at Stanford.

My error.

Name of these 2 doctors? Or at least the name of the company?

<crickets>

I'm sure.

[redietz]

You're the same guy who claims Stanford medicine suggests Ivermectin as a "gold standard". They don't and never did. Yet you told me (as a total internet random) should email them to verify.

lol.

Good stuff. Same ol same ol.

Maybe if you work hard you can get a nice freeroll for yourself.

May you can hit a $500 lick to pay off your tax bill.

Actually, this was my error. I did the follow-up. It turns out that the original research was done at Stanford, but Stanford felt it was not conclusive and wanted no part in promoting Ivermectin, for obvious funding reasons. So two of the doctors who did the research resigned and spun it off into their own private company. I should have said, the PREVIOUS lead virologist at Stanford.

My error.

Name of these 2 doctors? Or at least the name of the company?

<crickets>

I'm sure.

Look it up, account. I tracked it down in about half an hour. Not my job to do your work for you.

You got everything dead wrong in your summary of my wagering and so on listed above. You don't look anything up. You aren't even close to correct about anything. It's bizarre. So I'm in the Wise Guys for 30 years, picking two ATS games every week for every football season for 30 years, and I don't handicap ATS? And did you bother to look up the McCusker Report pages printed on this site under Retro Road Trip? All of that is obviously ATS. Almost anything I do is ATS.

I have never encountered such a lazy liar.

The reason, as Boz noted, that I handle all of this ridiculous and incorrect posting is that I am always critically evaluating myself. To an extreme. So I feel it part of the process to respond even when what's being said is semi-ridiculous. Like you stating that I don't handicap ATS. That's about the dumbest thing anyone has ever said about me.

If you want to bet on the Stanford virologist, email me.

[accountinquestion]

Actually, this was my error. I did the follow-up. It turns out that the original research was done at Stanford, but Stanford felt it was not conclusive and wanted no part in promoting Ivermectin, for obvious funding reasons. So two of the doctors who did the research resigned and spun it off into their own private company. I should have said, the PREVIOUS lead virologist at Stanford.

My error.

Name of these 2 doctors? Or at least the name of the company?

<crickets>

I'm sure.

Look it up, account. I tracked it down in about half an hour. Not my job to do your work for you.

You got everything dead wrong in your summary of my wagering and so on listed above. You don't look anything up. You aren't even close to correct about anything. It's bizarre. So I'm in the Wise Guys for 30 years, picking two ATS games every week for every football season for 30 years, and I don't handicap ATS? And did you bother to look up the McCusker Report pages printed on this site under Retro Road Trip? All of that is obviously ATS. Almost anything I do is ATS.

I have never encountered such a lazy liar.

The reason, as Boz noted, that I handle all of this ridiculous and incorrect posting is that I am always critically evaluating myself. To an extreme. So I feel it part of the process to respond even when what's being said is semi-ridiculous. Like you stating that I don't handicap ATS. That's about the dumbest thing anyone has ever said about me.

If you want to bet on the Stanford virologist, email me.

I love it "you didn't bother to look it up?" yet AGAIN. Straight from your bullshit cover playbook page 1.

You can't make this shit up.

Why would anyone of any intelligence spend time researching another lie of yours? Of course you won't answer. This is the same thing as you said about Stanford recommending Ivermectin. I wasted enough time researching it previously under the assumption you wouldn't make up such a bold lie. So now you make up another lie because the first one was Kewl level bullshit and start right back over. You know it doesn't exist.

Why would I bet with a welcher? You're a total broke dick and everyone on here knows it.

Handicapping to me would mean originating your own spreads specifically. You can pick sides all day ATS without doing that. It is when you actually bet cash that things change dramatically and you need the underlying EV of the bet to determine whether to bet it.

Integrity sports

haha haha oh hoho haha

Hope you can convince some rubes to "invest" in you at this club.

Good God you have no shame.

[Treeshade]

Name of these 2 doctors? Or at least the name of the company?

<crickets>

I'm sure.

Look it up, account. I tracked it down in about half an hour. Not my job to do your work for you.

You got everything dead wrong in your summary of my wagering and so on listed above. You don't look anything up. You aren't even close to correct about anything. It's bizarre. So I'm in the Wise Guys for 30 years, picking two ATS games every week for every football season for 30 years, and I don't handicap ATS? And did you bother to look up the McCusker Report pages printed on this site under Retro Road Trip? All of that is obviously ATS. Almost anything I do is ATS.

I have never encountered such a lazy liar.

The reason, as Boz noted, that I handle all of this ridiculous and incorrect posting is that I am always critically evaluating myself. To an extreme. So I feel it part of the process to respond even when what's being said is semi-ridiculous. Like you stating that I don't handicap ATS. That's about the dumbest thing anyone has ever said about me.

If you want to bet on the Stanford virologist, email me.

I love it "you didn't bother to look it up?" yet AGAIN. Straight from your bullshit cover playbook page 1.

You can't make this shit up.

Why would anyone of any intelligence spend time researching another lie of yours? Of course you won't answer. This is the same thing as you said about Stanford recommending Ivermectin. I wasted enough time researching it previously under the assumption you wouldn't make up such a bold lie. So now you make up another lie because the first one was Kewl level bullshit and start right back over. You know it doesn't exist.

Why would I bet with a welcher? You're a total broke dick and everyone on here knows it.

Handicapping to me would mean originating your own spreads specifically. You can pick sides all day ATS without doing that. It is when you actually bet cash that things change dramatically and you need the underlying EV of the bet to determine whether to bet it.

Integrity sports

haha haha oh hoho haha

Hope you can convince some rubes to "invest" in you at this club.

Good God you have no shame.

If red doesn’t have at least 20 million in the bank after all those years running other peoples money then it’s a waste of time to attend. These so called pros should at Least be verified as a top tier winner in their respected field. Considering there are guys who have made a Billion with a B sports betting I’m sure red could show 20 million. It’s doubtful he had mid six figures at this point considering he owes property tax.

[redietz]

Meeting went well, I thought. We started at 3 PM so we had a little more time.

The head of the club was MIA due to his wife testing positive for Covid yesterday, so everyone pitched in. The questions were interesting and covered the gamut. The guest who ran the high stakes cartel concomitant with The Computer Group fielded many of the questions. There were some good math questions from one guy who has taught college probability/statistics. I seemed to handle those okay.

Already got a couple of nice thank you emails from attendees, which surprised me. There were some really good observations regarding Walters' OCD tendencies and what wasn't stated in the book. Follow-up lunch next week.