Who cares! $64,000 for Todd is pocket change. He was only paid 640 for 1. Not a huge win compared to the bet amount.
Who cares! $64,000 for Todd is pocket change. He was only paid 640 for 1. Not a huge win compared to the bet amount.
egaliteOriginally Posted by jbjb
Maybe Druff will share is his Freeplay numbers for his next mailer.
I don't do the multi card thing. Is it still primarily based on coin in?
Or any chance that $64k gets him substantially more free play?
"Prior restraint" would seem inapplicable as it is the suppression of libelous or harmful info before publication.Originally Posted by coach bellyWould you invoke prior restraint, such that an image of said W2G posted online shall not be admitted, because it could be faked?Originally Posted by MisterV
While I have no problem with a W2-G being published online, depending on who posted it and the circumstances I'd likely question its probative value: I doubt I'd question the veracity of a purported original were it proferred to me for personal inspection.
What, Me Worry?
Wtf. Singer and smelly belly asking for proof of Druff's hit? Is Dan Druff now on trial as well?
This is a freaking gambling forum. Druff shared a jackpot he hit (and good for him). He shared a picture that all seems to work. No strange exercise equipment in the background or cursor on the screen.
Anyone that doesn't want to believe it....then don't believe it.
Druff dont show these fuckers shit. Who the fuck are they.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
I have the original W2G issued at the time of the win V. If you were to see it, are you saying that would be the proof you really never wanted to see? Or would you do as lying kew would do, and claim it's a fake like you and he do when you lie about my cash....or keep bringing up silly "exercise equipment" and that non-existent cursor that isn't in the original picture?Originally Posted by coach bellyWould you invoke prior restraint, such that an image of said W2G posted online shall not be admitted, because it could be faked?Originally Posted by MisterV
Make the tough choices V.
You have no reading comprehension.Originally Posted by kewlJ
I didn't ask for proof, I asked for an accepted criteria for proof.
Robert, in your case I'd have to insist on you satisfying three criteria, due to my belief that you're a clever, slippery little devil.Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
1) I'd personally hold, view and examine the W2-G you were given;
2) You'd tell me the name of the casino you won at as well as the date, and you'd sign an authorization for them to verify that yes, you won as claimed: verification to be written and mailed to me from the casino and on their letterhead: and finally
3) You'd allow me to review your IRS return for the year in question so that the circle would be unbroken.
Sorry to hold you to such strict scrutiny, but I'm sure you can understand.
What, Me Worry?
Yeah, anything shy of witnessing the casino (Where the jackpot was hit) hand over some type of documentation in person (duplicate W2, Win/loss) is subject to trickery (not referring to Druffs jackpot) and must be questioned.
That definition is only applicable in a government proceeding.Originally Posted by MisterV
It has no bearing in this venue.
Why is Druff's jackpot protected from scrutiny?Originally Posted by PositiveVariance
Because he doesn't make up outrageous claims that have proven to be false. If he had it would be a different story. Between here and PFA, no one is questioning if this was actually his Jackpot.Originally Posted by coach bellyWhy is Druff's jackpot protected from scrutiny?Originally Posted by PositiveVariance
No history of outrageous, unverifiable claims, as well as there not being any motivation to pull such a stunt. He would have zero motivation to falsely claim a $64k Jackpot.
Will $64k change his lifestyle? Doubtful. Will $64k change what others think of him? No. Does HE think a $64k Jackpot would change what others think of him? No.
Absolutely zero upside
If anything it puts him in a bad spot. He now has to potentially answer questions as to how much he tipped, which he admitted it is a position he hates to be in. As well as all the questions (Here and PFA) about the particular pay table and the potential upside to playing this particular machine to begin with.
Last edited by PositiveVariance; 11-24-2023 at 10:09 PM.
Well get to scrutinizing boy genius.Originally Posted by coach bellyWhy is Druff's jackpot protected from scrutiny?Originally Posted by PositiveVariance
It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"
Indeed; why then did you think it did?Originally Posted by coach bellyThat definition is only applicable in a government proceeding.Originally Posted by MisterV
It has no bearing in this venue.
Your query: "Would you invoke prior restraint, such that an image of said W2G posted online shall not be admitted, because it could be faked?"
Under no set of facts would your hypothetical be subject to a "prior restraint" sanction as currently defined and understood in the law.
Of course you can make up your own notions of the law, as you just did, and nobody will care, they'll only snicker.
What, Me Worry?
Here's a flash PV: inasmuch as $64k wouldn't change Dan's life, $1.5m doesn't change mine.Originally Posted by PositiveVarianceBecause he doesn't make up outrageous claims that have proven to be false. If he had it would be a different story. Between here and PFA, no one is questioning if this was actually his Jackpot.Originally Posted by coach bellyWhy is Druff's jackpot protected from scrutiny?Originally Posted by PositiveVariance
No history of outrageous, unverifiable claims, as well as there not being any motivation to pull such a stunt. He would have zero motivation to falsely claim a $64k Jackpot.
Will $64k change his lifestyle? Doubtful. Will $64k change what others think of him? No. Does HE think a $64k Jackpot would change what others think of him? No.
Absolutely zero upside
If anything it puts him in a bad spot. He now has to potentially answer questions as to how much he tipped, which he admitted it is a position he hates to be in. As well as all the questions (Here and PFA) about the particular pay table and the potential upside to playing this particular machine to begin with.
I've proven for years in published and verified articles of jackpots in GT that I played up thru the $100 machines. Yes, much, but not all, of that was from playing the DU bug--another one of your alleged "outrageous claims" from me--WHICH I'VE BASICALLY PROVEN BY PROVIDING THE EXACT AND DETAILED PLAY STEPS AFTER WIRED PURPOSELY PUBLISHED IT PROCEDURALLY WRONG.
These claims are only "outrageous" to you because I've never been one of the little people. And all those "theories" about my win that were perpetrated by envious people were disproven and rightfully ridiculed.
So Dan should absolutely be under the same scrutiny as anybody else. He's no saint, and he's been caught lying several times, and name a trustworthy poker player.
V, no casino is gonna send out verification letters, permission or not, of a jackpot hit by one of their past hi-limit players. What kind of retired lawyer ARE you anyway? And while I do still have my tax return copy with the $1.5m included, unlike nearly everyone else here as well as probably you, my wife has her financial included in our JOINT returns. Letting a highly envious stranger see them is something she'd never agree to. Really, how dumb ARE you?Originally Posted by MisterVRobert, in your case I'd have to insist on you satisfying three criteria, due to my belief that you're a clever, slippery little devil.Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
1) I'd personally hold, view and examine the W2-G you were given;
2) You'd tell me the name of the casino you won at as well as the date, and you'd sign an authorization for them to verify that yes, you won as claimed: verification to be written and mailed to me from the casino and on their letterhead: and finally
3) You'd allow me to review your IRS return for the year in question so that the circle would be unbroken.
Sorry to hold you to such strict scrutiny, but I'm sure you can understand.
The only real way for you to verify is by my meeting you in LV, handing you the signer, then taking you to the casino for verbal confirmation--all of which was tried before with Dan, who chose to claim he "fell asleep" rather than confirm he'd meet me, thereby being able to continue his and others' false claims about the win. Honestly, I really don't see you traveling anywhere out of your area after you turned down dinner with us a hundred miles from your home.
Correct.
Robert, you asked me what I'd require, and I answered.
I never asked; you did, so I answered...in the abstract.
I never said I wanted to follow up and actually travel a thousand miles to meet you to go over something that means nothing of consequence to me.
I don't have enough interest in the matter to meet with you in order for you, be it in Las Vegas or elsewhere, in order to allow you to attempt to prove your claim.
I've already passed judgment and there is no appeal.
What, Me Worry?
The last time Rob attempted to show paper documentation of anything, it was a bill of sale for his non-existent Newell RV. Rob printed out a generic bill of sale from an internet site, that had no company logo, and filled it out with 3 different signatures in the same handwriting. He then crumpled up the freshly printed piece of paper attempting to make it look several years old and posted it online. Instead, it looked like a freshly printed document that someone had crumpled up to make it look old.
Last year, after Rob's phony jackpot picture was systematically taken apart, he arranged to meet with not one but 2 different people to "show further proof of this phantom jackpot". First was MaxPen. A meeting was scheduled for noon at South Point. On the day in question Rob claims he showed up at !0:30 am, 90 minutes early, and with no one there (why would they be 90 minutes early) Rob says he drove 5 hours back to Phoenix. Like that makes any sense. Problem was Dan Druff confirmed according to IP address, Rob never left Pheonix.
Several weeks later Rob attempted this whole silliness again, this time reneging on a meet up with Dan Druff at GVR. I guess Rob thinks people have forgotten these troll games he plays and has got caught in. He now is looking for a new fish, to agree to meet him and end up wasting a whole day when Rob doesn't show.
Rob, You must be stupider than you, and I don't know if that is even possible, because you look pretty damn dumb, you Larry Fine looking fool. At the very least, get some fucking new material, instead of replaying the same BS.
Last edited by kewlJ; 11-25-2023 at 01:08 AM.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
If you add up Rob's gambling claims, The double up bug (that he stole from the news), his stupid progression wagering system, his phantom 1.2 million dollar jackpot, it adds up to over 5 million dollars. And yet, Rob lives in his daughter's house.
It is like Jerry Stiller's character in that old King of Queens sitcom, living in the daughter and son-in-laws basement. Only difference is Rob has a wife in tow, and desert homes have no basements because of the hard, dried out ground.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
There are currently 91 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 91 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
