Originally Posted by
mickeycrimm
Originally Posted by
kewlJ
That is fine mickeycrimm. We all know what the sports betting industry is and that many sports bettor do that type of touting. I don't beleive there is any rule against having your own site and doing that, is there?
And if you guys want to point out that he did that on his own site, that is fine too. My only gripe is people making up this narrative where he has used this and other forums to solicit people, when I see no evidence of that at all. Remember when Dan Druff busted Mdawg for soliciting people? And that was only involving trolling activity. If Redietz was soliciting members here, Dan Druff would have known about it and put a stop to it, don't ya think?
I am not talking specifically of you, but I am just getting really tired of this bullshit where if someone doesn't like someone it is fair game to make up whatever you want about them. THAT isn't free speech, as Druff defends it as. That is slander, and in the real world people would have their ass hauled off into court for slander and defamation.
Can't we all just not like someone, not believe someone's claims without this kind of bullshit? Redietz has done and said more than enough things to warrant legitimate criticism hasn't he? Do people really need to make up shit?
Watch the latest video in the Sports Betting thread. A syndicate sports bettor said they don't solicit for money. They can't get down enough of their own money so other people's money does them no good. It's other people's accounts they want to exploit. They will bet their money on other people's accounts and give them a cut of the win.
Do you ever read your own garbage, mickey? Jesus Christ, rub some brain cells together.
Five things, off the top of my head. First, you have to be winning consistently to do that, which is a rare, rare thing. So kudos to anyone doing that and then sharing the wealth. I don't do that, by the way. I'm not betting more than 50K a game, so no need.
Second, if a person uses someone else's accounts as beards, you run the risk of those "someone elses" withdrawing the money and hightailing it. Or you run the risk of those "someone elses" breaking site rules with their own betting and getting you labeled.
Third, if you are discovered in any way using multiple accounts, offshores will ban you and withhold your money. It's right there in most sites' rules and regs. They will also define you a certain way. Non offshores will simply ban you, and I'm sure they will spread the info of your transgressions to other non offshore books.
Four, literally 80% of my wagering is college football. That creates an idiosyncratic profile that is unmistakable. I couldn't hide who I am if I wanted to. There are only a handful of people with any betting profile resembling mine.
Five, there has been no one, on any forum or any site, going back 50 years, who has reported that I'm using their accounts. Ever. Zero.
Mickey is simply doing his usual "AP" speculation. LOL. He speculates; he uses the math of random events to predict non-random events. It's mostly ballpark guessing and making up whatever shit helps him have an excuse to bet the alphabet. And he bullshits about anyone who calls him on it. The mickey crimm "AP" playbook.
He needs to spend five seconds, at least once in awhile, thinking about the bullshit he posts. If any of you take crimm's advice on anything but pure machine gambling, God bless you. He really does think he's Leonardo Da AP. He's not.
There's really no evidence mickey knows what he's talking about outside of his machine gambling. In fact, he sometimes sounds like a naive maroon when he discusses other stuff.