Advantage Keno Play

[Mission146]

Think money, Bill. Think money. That’s the value of my knowledge of keno, lots of money.

I am absolutely convinced that no wealth in the world can help humanity forward, even in the hands of the most devoted worker in this cause. The example of great and pure characters is the only thing that can produce fine ideas and noble deeds. Money only appeals to selfishness and always tempts its owners irresistibly to abuse it. Can anyone imagine Moses, Jesus, or Gandhi armed with the money-bags of Carnegie?

― Albert Einstein, The World As I See It

Perhaps, you and Mission might want to carry on with the route of gambling messiahs, or connoisseurs, like 99% of the other gamblers, who spend their lives talking, in depth, only to themselves.

At least I'd generally like the company.

[mickeycrimm]

Unowme definitely found an exploitable play. I put it around 216%. There is available information I wasn’t aware a player could access to determine if there is an edge to be had.

[1Hit1der]

Au contraire mon ami.

Probably best to just put it out there, to begin. Like I put up my numerals for the fine-structure constants, a few months ago. For one thing, the numerals haven't changed, and, for another, to ostensively establish their origin.

A month ago, I started to review a bit of my work on the periodic table of elements. But, before I really got into it, another simple calculation seemed to take off. I tried to determined the number of thus elements for a six-dimensional universe. As I explained, before, the underlying numerical connection between 4, and, 6, and, so, to take things from a four-dimensional universe, to one with six.

Simplistically speaking, it was my position all along that our universe's periodic table has 290 possible elements because of the calculation, 17^2 = 289 plus element-0, for 290 elements. Which follows from a few already established facts, about the periodic table, to do with the numerals, 137, 172, and, the so-called "nuclear magic numbers". Anyway, the calculation for the six dimensions led me to 290 plus element-0, and, 1029 elements plus element-0. Note that 290 = 29*10, which contains the same digits as the numeral, 1029. Furthermore, the numeral, 153, fits in perfectly well, then, in addition to 137, etc, as above.

And, few more tentative calculations, from last evening, might indicate a few more numerologically striking underlying thus connections. Of the following four equations, in their raw form, the fourth didn't quite work out, on appearance, but, it was too darn close to outright dismiss.

#1. [17^2 + (002 - 01) + 0^0] = 290/291, read 1721 with 290/291,

#2. [12^3 + (-700 + 01) + 0^0] = 1029/1030, read as 1271 with 1029/1030,

#3. [19^2 - (00060 + 10) + 0^0] = 290/291, read as 1961 with 290/291, and

#4. [16^3 - (03000 + 10) + 4 + 0^0] = 1089/1090, read as 1691 with 1089/1090, depending on 0^0 = 1, in the quantum realm (of "mathematical" limits, about infinity), or, 0^0 = 0, in our realm.

The 1721, and 1961, along with a few others, historically speaking, contain my underlying go-to digits, with 2 = ᘖ rotating to 7 = ᘔ. Say, if look closely, the ᘔᘖ contains a 69.

Note, other than the same general form, for one of a few very curious things, that the 002 rotates to 700, and, the 00060 rotates to 09000 ---> [√9][000] = 3000. And, that 1090 = [10][3^2][0] ---> 1030. Usually what further happens with the 3's, and 9's - the 2's, and 7's, aren't thus relatable.

It seems that that out-of-place 4 has to do with 4 = (01 + 03) to go to the left side of equation #4, with 1090, to obtain 1090 ---> 1030 with (03 + 01) ---> 1030_0301, as if to signify both sides of the number of periodic table elements, ie, our's with the anti-matter universe's. And, if do the same with the other 3 equations, then equation #1 shifts 1, to [17^2 + (002 - 01) - 0^0] = 290/291, read 1721 with 290/291, with 0^0, so that all of the signs alternate in the first two equations, but, not in the last two equations. In other words, equations #1, and #4, are a bit off, but, #2, and #3, are a bit on.

The 0, 1, 2, and 9, digits seemed to thus stick out also in the bit more that I posted up about the fine-structure constants.


1Hit1der
1Hit1der is online now
Gold
1Hit1der's Avatar

Join Date
Nov 2023
Posts
196 ---> (10*9 + 6 + 100) ---> 1961

43 = (40 + √9) ---> 49 = 7^2 ---> 7/2, or July 2

[unowme]

Au contraire mon ami.

Probably best to just put it out there, to begin. Like I put up my numerals for the fine-structure constants, a few months ago. For one thing, the numerals haven't changed, and, for another, to ostensively establish their origin.

A month ago, I started to review a bit of my work on the periodic table of elements. But, before I really got into it, another simple calculation seemed to take off. I tried to determined the number of thus elements for a six-dimensional universe. As I explained, before, the underlying numerical connection between 4, and, 6, and, so, to take things from a four-dimensional universe, to one with six.

Simplistically speaking, it was my position all along that our universe's periodic table has 290 possible elements because of the calculation, 17^2 = 289 plus element-0, for 290 elements. Which follows from a few already established facts, about the periodic table, to do with the numerals, 137, 172, and, the so-called "nuclear magic numbers". Anyway, the calculation for the six dimensions led me to 290 plus element-0, and, 1029 elements plus element-0. Note that 290 = 29*10, which contains the same digits as the numeral, 1029. Furthermore, the numeral, 153, fits in perfectly well, then, in addition to 137, etc, as above.

And, few more tentative calculations, from last evening, might indicate a few more numerologically striking underlying thus connections. Of the following four equations, in their raw form, the fourth didn't quite work out, on appearance, but, it was too darn close to outright dismiss.

#1 [17^2 + (002 - 01) + 0^0] = 290/291, read 1721 with 290/291,

#2 [12^3 + (-700 + 01) + 0^0] = 1029/1030, read as 1271 with 1029/1030,

#3 [19^2 - (00060 + 10) + 0^0] = 290/291, read as 1961 with 290/291, and

#4 [16^3 - (03000 + 10) + 4 + 0^0] = 1089/1090, read as 1691 with 1089/1090, depending on 0^0 = 1, in the quantum realm (of "mathematical" limits, about infinity), or, 0^0 = 0, in our realm.

The 1721, and 1961, along with a few others, historically speaking, contain my underlying go-to digits, with 2 = ᘖ rotating to 7 = ᘔ. Say, if look closely, the ᘔᘖ containing a 69.

Note, other than the same general form, for one of a few very curious things, that the 002 rotates to 700, and, the 00060 rotates to 09000 ---> [√9][000] = 3000. And, that 1090 = [10][3^2][0] ---> 1030. Usually what further happens with the 3's, and 9's - the 2's, and 7's, aren't thus relatable.

It seems that that out-of-place 4 has to do with 4 = (01 + 03) to go to the left side of equation #4, with 1090, to obtain 1090 ---> 1030 with (03 + 01) ---> 1030_0301, as if to signify both sides of the number of periodic table elements, ie, our's with the anti-matter universe's. And, if do the same with the other 3 equations, then equation #1 shifts 1, to [17^2 + (002 - 01) - 0^0] = 290/291, read 1721 with 290/291, with 0^0, so that all of the signs alternate in the first two equations, but, not in the last two equations.

The 0, 1, 2, and 9, digits seemed to thus stick out also in the bit more that I posted up about the fine-structure constants.


1Hit1der
1Hit1der is online now
Gold
1Hit1der's Avatar

Join Date
Nov 2023
Posts
196 ---> (10*9 + 6 + 100) ---> 1961

43 = (40 + √9) ---> 49 = 7^2 ---> 7/2, or July 2

That explains everything.

[unowme]

Unowme definitely found an exploitable play. I put it around 216%. There is available information I wasn’t aware a player could access to determine if there is an edge to be had.

Thank you for taking the time to look at that for me. I really appreciate it.

[1Hit1der]

That explains everything.

It's based on the symmetry breaking of the mathematics side of things. In an underlying way that explains how we come to write out the digits.

My point above, was that it's best to just put it out there because, ultimately, secrets are worthless.

[unowme]

That explains everything.

My point above, was that it's best to just put it out there because, ultimately, secrets are worthless.

Of course that's why we should all turn to nudism.

[MisterV]

I sent Micky a PM. Based on his response, I'll decide how to proceed. Maybe he'll just say that I'm full of shit. Then again, maybe not.

MC said the play is "exploitable"; so, how will you "proceed" now?

[1Hit1der]

Of course that's why we should all turn to nudism.

Regarding sex education: no secrets!

― Albert Einstein

If you want your children to be intelligent, read them fairy tales. If you want them to be more intelligent, read them more fairy tales.

― Albert Einstein

Einstein's weird sex life

Albert Einstein may be regarded as one of the world's most important scientists but despite his innumerable professional successes, he found it hard to sustain a thriving personal life, according to a new book.

In his book, Einstein: His Life and Universe, Walter Isaacson has described how Einstein found maintaining a harmonious love life a battle he would never win.

In fact, so pragmatic was Einstein's approach to love, that when he found his 11-year marriage to fellow scientist Mileva Maric was floundering, he issued a list of outrageous rules that he believed would allow the two to remain together for the sake of the children, the Daily Mail reported.

Shockingly the list demanded Maric continue to act as maid to her erstwhile husband - yet should expect no affection or attention in return.

Einstein was prompted to write the list when, in 1914,he realised that after 11 years, his marriage to first wife Maric - one of the first women to study mathematics and physics in Europe - was destined for failure.

The scientist ordered that she keep his rooms tidy, bring him three meals a day (to be eaten in his room), keep his clothes and laundry in good order, and keep his bedroom and study neat (she should not use his desk, of course).

There would apparently be no benefits to Maric in return. In fact, Einstein specified in his list of conditions, printed in Isaacson''s book (via website listsofnote.com), that she must not expect Einstein to either sit with her, or accompany her outside of the house - and she must stop talking when he requests.

She must 'renounce all personal relations' not strictly necessary for social reasons - which should not include expecting to be accompanied on social engagements.

Also, Einstein stipulated that his wife should not expect any intimacy from him, should not reproach him in any way; should stop talking to him if he requested it; should leave his bedroom or study immediately without protest if requested, and should refrain from belittling him in front of the children, either through words or behaviour.

After all of that, Einstein went on to marry his first, and second, cousin. Ha.

[MisterV]

Einstein's weird sex life

Albert Einstein may be regarded as one of the world's most important scientists but despite his innumerable professional successes, he found it hard to sustain a thriving personal life, according to a new book.

In his book, Einstein: His Life and Universe, Walter Isaacson has described how Einstein found maintaining a harmonious love life a battle he would never win.

In fact, so pragmatic was Einstein's approach to love, that when he found his 11-year marriage to fellow scientist Mileva Maric was floundering, he issued a list of outrageous rules that he believed would allow the two to remain together for the sake of the children, the Daily Mail reported.

Shockingly the list demanded Maric continue to act as maid to her erstwhile husband - yet should expect no affection or attention in return.

Einstein was prompted to write the list when, in 1914,he realised that after 11 years, his marriage to first wife Maric - one of the first women to study mathematics and physics in Europe - was destined for failure.

The scientist ordered that she keep his rooms tidy, bring him three meals a day (to be eaten in his room), keep his clothes and laundry in good order, and keep his bedroom and study neat (she should not use his desk, of course).

There would apparently be no benefits to Maric in return. In fact, Einstein specified in his list of conditions, printed in Isaacson''s book (via website listsofnote.com), that she must not expect Einstein to either sit with her, or accompany her outside of the house - and she must stop talking when he requests.

She must 'renounce all personal relations' not strictly necessary for social reasons - which should not include expecting to be accompanied on social engagements.

Also, Einstein stipulated that his wife should not expect any intimacy from him, should not reproach him in any way; should stop talking to him if he requested it; should leave his bedroom or study immediately without protest if requested, and should refrain from belittling him in front of the children, either through words or behaviour.

Bravo, Al...have it YOUR way.

[unowme]

I sent Micky a PM. Based on his response, I'll decide how to proceed. Maybe he'll just say that I'm full of shit. Then again, maybe not.

MC said the play is "exploitable"; so, how will you "proceed" now?

I am taking it under advisement. As max noted early in this thread there is risk to publishing it the open. Let's have a show of hands to see who would be interested if should I decide to PM it to a few members. In the meantime, I figure that since I discovered it, I get to name the exploit. I'm working on that now.

[accountinquestion]

I sent Micky a PM. Based on his response, I'll decide how to proceed. Maybe he'll just say that I'm full of shit. Then again, maybe not.

MC said the play is "exploitable"; so, how will you "proceed" now?

I am taking it under advisement. As max noted early in this thread there is risk to publishing it the open. Let's have a show of hands to see who would be interested if should I decide to PM it to a few members. In the meantime, I figure that since I discovered it, I get to name the exploit. I'm working on that now.

I'm definitely interested in hearing what it is. I've been collecting knowledge/stories of these things over the years. Anything out there is useful just because maybe I'll come across a variant somewhere or have an idea of what to look for elsewhere. I wouldn't expect to travel specifically to the location but wouldn't particularly be against it.

[coach belly]

Let's have a show of hands to see who would be interested

+1

[jdog]

Count me in!

[1Hit1der]

I live for math.

You're not another KJ, are you?

I would have asked Max (behind the scenes) to put a team on it, for a million or so, or as long as it lasts, for 5% of the result, and, then, keep my fingers crossed.

The only thing that I know about Keno is that that area of casinos in Vegas didn't seem to be too busy. And, the guy, years, ago, who figured out that a particular casino had a game with the same random number generator seed each time the game was reset. He made a million or something - if I recall - but, the second day, he went for it, again, so, the casino shut it down.

[unowme]

I live for math.

You're not another KJ, are you?
.

You're not another Rob Singer, are you?

[theywontpayontuesday]

I also have a keno advantage I've found and cannot take advantage of personally. Probably not the same casino, but it could be. Send me a PM if you would like to pick my pocket so you can make all the money,

[1Hit1der]

I live for math.

You're not another KJ, are you?

You're not another Rob Singer, are you?

No, but, he appears to be too smart to become involved in something like this.

But, I did learn something more.

Both "involved in" and "involved with" are grammatically correct. There is a difference in meaning between the two. "Involved in" refers to participation or being a part of something. "Involved with" refers to being connected or associated with something or someone.

P.S. Call it the UKnowMeForTheBirdsPlay. Ha.

*backs away slowly


1Hit1der 1Hit1der is online now
Gold
1Hit1der's AvatarJoin Date
Nov 2023
Posts
200

[unowme]

You're not another KJ, are you?

You're not another Rob Singer, are you?

No, but, he appears to be too smart to become involved in it. Ha.

Singer? Too Smart? Ha! Instead of 'becoming involved', he'd just claim he invented it back in 1990. Ha Ha!

[Dan Druff]

I received the PM with an extensive description of the play.

It is my strong opinion that it is real, and he was telling the truth.

Unfortunately, it is not a play which can work "anytime". For example, I could not just go down to that same casino (or any casino) and pull it off. This, of course, lowers its value tremendously, due to low availability. But when you do find it under the right circumstances, it could be excellent.