Advantage Keno Play

[1Hit1der]

I give a shit.

It's beyond my ken, but I give two shits in fact.

Thank you, again, MrV. Ha.

What continues to give me the most satisfaction is my calculation of the fine-structure constants, based solely, and conclusively, on the numbers. The physics can never do any better than refinements, in the sense that there is always something else to unpack even though in a predetermined way, and, so, becomes an endless debate not worth getting into.

When I get more of it written/posted up in the right places, I will report the results. But, I'm still pretty busy with stuff of a mundane nature.

At least my typos, etc, now are limited mostly to the peripheral stuff, like 297 = 11* 3^2 ---> 113 instead of 297 = 11* 3^3 ---> 113 .

[Rob.Singer]

Only someone like MrV, who spends his lonely, declining years on mind-altering drugs, would even bother to glance at and/or try to apply any meaning to the constant gobbledygook you for some reason feel the need to post.

The rest? We simply attribute it to mental issues, and ignore.

[MisterV]

Only someone like MrV, who spends his lonely, declining years on mind-altering drugs, would even bother to glance at and/or try to apply any meaning to the constant gobbledygook you for some reason feel the need to post. The rest? We simply attribute it to mental issues, and ignore.

Garnabby is working on creating something that would outlast him.

That you dismiss it so casually is typical of you.

Me, I say "Go for it...even if I don't really understand."

Ulitimately he's trying to decode existence; as a person with a keen interest in philosophy such a thing intrigues me.

[Rob.Singer]

Garnabby is working on creating something that would outlast him.

That you dismiss it so casually is typical of you.

My left nut will outlast him.

[1Hit1der]

Everyone seems, or is institutionally forced, to think that a serious TOE must look mostly like the last (essentially failed) one. If you do that sort and degree of thing "to make a living", then the latter is exactly what you end up with. The fatal fear of starting from first principles, but here, from scratch, in the sense that there are no first principles on par with the universe. All there is to go on is that you have to start with it, and, then, after whichever calculations, end up with with exactly the same universe that you started with. Regardless, what else to try when the scientific consensus resoundingly reduces to mantras like one profound truth may totally contradict another, and, etc, and no infinite sets, and, etc, are allowed (because they totally disrupt the math (which didn't really work, anyway))?

For one thing, the math can't exist outside of the universe, and, so, also its symmetry was broken, very shortly after the "big bang". Even if God exists, whether outside of the known universe, then His mind can't be ours. And, whether the symmetry of numbers was broken, then given that virtually no scientist believes that it was, it's highly fertile ground, possibly even an entirely new branch, or area.

Who knows, someone else might thus come to find that dimensions 0, and 4, involve integer numerals, but, dimensions 1, and 3, complex numerals, and, that dimension-2 involves real numerals, instead of all of them being real numerals, (or complex numerals if you prefer those, and, can make them into something continuous, say, by the surreal numerals). Wouldn't it be something if this approach might explain a few of even the mathematical contradictions such as the sum of the positive integers being -1/12? Might explain away the whole problem with infinite sets.

BTW, MrV, you're hired! Ha. Also the MDawg is fading fast?