Definition of a liar.

[MisterV]

I haven't puffed, I simply do not understand the point you are trying to make.

BTW, they're clamoring for you back at WoV, it seems your time in exile may have come to an end.

Go get em, tiger...bwa ha ha ha

[kewlJ]

My report isn't going to conclude anything; people may draw conclusions from it if they want to. I was not asked to offer an opinion in conjunction with this project and have no plans to do so.

I join with others in asking why you wouldn't share your thoughts? There is no one that has more insight into an investigation than the person who did the investigation. I don't think you will write every detail that you see....if you did your report would be as long as the Mdawg thread, so you will always have more details and information than your report, which is precisely what would make your opinion valuable.

I understand you have no real interest in this and wouldn't be doing if if not asked (and or paid). Essentially, you have no dog <- in this fight. That objectivity is what would add to your opinion/conclusion.

And if you have completed your work, how about stop playing games and submit it. Mdawg is now off suspension, the thread re-opened. All that can happen with a further delay is more people getting suspended providing a reason for further delay. Maybe even someone intentionally doing so.

[MaxPen]

My report isn't going to conclude anything; people may draw conclusions from it if they want to. I was not asked to offer an opinion in conjunction with this project and have no plans to do so.

I join with others in asking why you wouldn't share your thoughts? There is no one that has more insight into an investigation than the person who did the investigation. I don't think you will write every detail that you see....if you did your report would be as long as the Mdawg thread, so you will always have more details and information than your report, which is precisely what would make your opinion valuable.

I understand you have no real interest in this and wouldn't be doing if if not asked (and or paid). Essentially, you have no dog <- in this fight. That objectivity is what would add to your opinion/conclusion.

And if you have completed your work, how about stop playing games and submit it. Mdawg is now off suspension, the thread re-opened. All that can happen with a further delay is more people getting suspended providing a reason for further delay. Maybe even someone intentionally doing so.

A tabulation of the portions of play reported is meaningless. A complete waste time. No meaningful opinion can be drawn with any conclusiveness. Just like everything else you had already came to your own imaginary ending and started putting your false conclusions out into the wild. Now you look like a bigger fool than you already did.....RIP

[kewlJ]

the portions of play reported i

This is my problem Max pen. Considering just my blackjack results, I have made a bit over 1.5 million in my 20 years. (For the sake of this exercise, please don't troll that number).

Now what if I considered ONLY the hands I won and ignored the hands I lost. I could probably say something like I have won 100 million dollars (ignoring the 98.5 million lost along the way). Would that be fair? Would that not be intentionally misleading? Lying?

What if I did the same by session or day, only reporting winning days or session and making no mention of losing days or sessions. Is that fair? Misleading (intentionally), lying?

Is there another term you would prefer besides, intentional misleading or lying? Maybe creatively selective results?

[Mission146]

My report isn't going to conclude anything; people may draw conclusions from it if they want to. I was not asked to offer an opinion in conjunction with this project and have no plans to do so.

I join with others in asking why you wouldn't share your thoughts? There is no one that has more insight into an investigation than the person who did the investigation. I don't think you will write every detail that you see....if you did your report would be as long as the Mdawg thread, so you will always have more details and information than your report, which is precisely what would make your opinion valuable.

I understand you have no real interest in this and wouldn't be doing if if not asked (and or paid). Essentially, you have no dog <- in this fight. That objectivity is what would add to your opinion/conclusion.

And if you have completed your work, how about stop playing games and submit it. Mdawg is now off suspension, the thread re-opened. All that can happen with a further delay is more people getting suspended providing a reason for further delay. Maybe even someone intentionally doing so.

First, I don't feel like it.

Second, I've never cared about this subject.

Third, MaxPen summarized my opinion on this quite nicely with, "A complete waste of time."

This isn't an investigation; it's rudimentary arithmetic. MDawg reports date (post date), game, result...I put date/game/result in table...I add result/game combo to the running total for that table. I complete table (usually fifteen entries) and add to the previous results.

My opinion remains the same as it was prior to my undertaking this---I don't care. I also haven't actually been reading very much; I'm mostly just looking for the game and results.

[MaxPen]

the portions of play reported i

This is my problem Max pen. Considering just my blackjack results, I have made a bit over 1.5 million in my 20 years. (For the sake of this exercise, please don't troll that number).

Now what if I considered ONLY the hands I won and ignored the hands I lost. I could probably say something like I have won 100 million dollars (ignoring the 98.5 million lost along the way). Would that be fair? Would that not be intentionally misleading? Lying?

What if I did the same by session or day, only reporting winning days or session and making no mention of losing days or sessions. Is that fair? Misleading (intentionally), lying?

Is there another term you would prefer besides, intentional misleading or lying? Maybe creatively selective results?

You are not judge, jury, and executioner regarding what people post. You lie on the regular. To protect your identity is your excuse every time you get caught. You're just upset because your MDawg deflections aren't working to have your lies accepted by the forums. Like AiQ says, "GET HELP"

[Rob.Singer]

Queers don't get help. They get butt-fucked.

[soxfan]

Some cats lie about some stuff some of the times but the kewl-J lie about everything, all of the times, hey hey.

[kewlJ]

More doggy- doo from the house of wizardry.

Mdawg's 60 straight winning hands at blackjack claim. Wizard offered Mdawg a chance to walk back this claim. Mdawg went a different direction, doubling down by saying he won "just under 70k", "betting roughly $800" (flat-betting) during that miraculous run.

Houston, we have a problem. It is called math. Someone posted that Mdawg would have needed to have needed a 146% return on each of his $800 bets during that magical streak. Yes, there are double downs and splits in blackjack, but 146% would be basically receiving a blackjack every round. More ridiculousness.

So hold on, the best is yet to come. Mdawg had an explanation. The "just under 70k" and "roughly $800" a bet flat-betting were intentionally vague.

Ok 2 things, "roughly $800" doesn't mean $800? what does it mean $789? $794? $779? remember he was flat-betting, which means betting the same amount each round. So now he was betting some odd amount, rainbow style, for 60 rounds? You just can't make this stuff up....and yet he has.

But, going back to the original post of this thread, where I posted the first months results of his 7-month, 2021 trip where he posted wins of well over $500k for the trip, and then in one sentence "about even". No big deal. Half a million to a million in winnings or "about even" He was just being vague.

[accountinquestion]

More doggy- doo from the house of wizardry.

Mdawg's 60 straight winning hands at blackjack claim. Wizard offered Mdawg a chance to walk back this claim. Mdawg went a different direction, doubling down by saying he won "just under 70k", "betting roughly $800" (flat-betting) during that miraculous run.

Houston, we have a problem. It is called math. Someone posted that Mdawg would have needed to have needed a 146% return on each of his $800 bets during that magical streak. Yes, there are double downs and splits in blackjack, but 146% would be basically receiving a blackjack every round. More ridiculousness.

So hold on, the best is yet to come. Mdawg had an explanation. The "just under 70k" and "roughly $800" a bet flat-betting were intentionally vague.

Ok 2 things, "roughly $800" doesn't mean $800? what does it mean $789? $794? $779? remember he was flat-betting, which means betting the same amount each round. So now he was betting some odd amount, rainbow style, for 60 rounds? You just can't make this stuff up....and yet he has.

But, going back to the original post of this thread, where I posted the first months results of his 7-month, 2021 trip where he posted wins of well over $500k for the trip, and then in one sentence "about even". No big deal. Half a million to a million in winnings or "about even" He was just being vague.

When you do the same thing you sit here and tell us you're 2-3 steps ahead because of nonsense like the above. lol. good stuff.

Get help.

[kewlJ]

When you do the same thing you sit here and tell us you're 2-3 steps ahead because of nonsense like the above. lol. good stuff.

You are conflating things. It is ok to be vague, to protect yourself as APs do, so the casinos can't identify them. BUT the math has to work!!!

And the big question is who is Mdawg protecting himself from? He claims to play rated, with multiple sets of eyes from pit to surveillance on his every move. So who is he hiding from or protecting himself from by "being vague"?

This is really the best part of this for me. Watching some of you here on this forum, real players and APs, defending and making excuses for Mdawg. Why? Because you don't like me. Absolutely precious!

[accountinquestion]

When you do the same thing you sit here and tell us you're 2-3 steps ahead because of nonsense like the above. lol. good stuff.

You are conflating things. It is ok to be vague, to protect yourself as APs do, so the casinos can't identify them. BUT the math has to work!!!

And the big question is who is Mdawg protecting himself from? He claims to play rated, with multiple sets of eyes from pit to surveillance on his every move. So who is he hiding from or protecting himself from by "being vague"?

This is really the best part of this for me. Watching some of you here on this forum, real players and APs, defending and making excuses for Mdawg. Why? Because you don't like me. Absolutely precious!

What do you have in life that is of more importance to you than Mdawg?

Food is an obvious answer and doesn't count.

[kewlJ]

**Yawn**

I could ask the same of you. You usually are the first to respond to anything and everything I say, usually within minutes.

[MDawg]

It's astonishing that someone could get past the age of 30 (isn't he over 40 now, assuming any of what he claims is true, which for all we know he might be a wizened 80 year old given all his health problems), and not have any sort of understanding of human nature.

I think kewlJ doesn't understand why so many people here dislike him.

It's not just that he lies. We've had lots of liars on this forum.

It's the seriousness with which kewlJ tells these lies, and then lashes out at those who doubt them. There's a certain arrogance to those posts, in the tone, "Of course this is fucking true, and you're a complete idiot for even doubting this."

We can account for (but not excuse) the constant lying by accepting that he's pathological, but how to explain the complete lack of comprehending that no one believes anything he has to say, and that he's just digging himself further into a hole daily.

And by no one, I include V, because even he by now has come around to realize that something is rotten in the state of UNKewlJ (besides his tunnel rotted shoes) and is long past accepting the UNKewl lies without question.

It defies all logic (and math!) that anyone so indecisiveness, and blind to reading people could possibly be any kind of success in a casino table game environment, or really, be successful at most anything. Hence the obvious homeless tunnel dweller inevitability.

The thing about KJ - if you actually read what he writes - is that he constantly echoes the words/phrases and themes of the immediately previous replies by others. As I noted, a while back, he's extremely suggestible. Not someone in control of even his own life. People don't always end up in places like Vegas by their own conscious volition. My guess would be some nut-job living from one day to the next, now on the internet. Certainly of negligible intelligence, etc.

[kewlJ]

Questions Mdawg?

Were you living in the mid 7 figure mansion, when you won 60 straight blackjack hands in a row, with a return of 146% per hand, winning just under 70 grand?

Were you living in the mid 7 figure mansion, when you spread $100 to $5000 (1-50) at double deck blackjack FOR 10 STRAIGHT HOURS, with a return of 146% per hand, winning 60 grand?

And just how "vague" were you in making these claims? Like the difference between 60 or 70 grand and "about even"?

[accountinquestion]

**Yawn**

I could ask the same of you. You usually are the first to respond to anything and everything I say, usually within minutes.

lol right. Sometimes I'm bored AF and hitting this site a few times an hour sometimes not. You're fucking ecstatic to have someone respond to you multiple times in an hour.

But yea.. you couldn't answer the question. Pretty much food is only thing higher on pyramid for you.

[accountinquestion]

It's astonishing that someone could get past the age of 30 (isn't he over 40 now, assuming any of what he claims is true, which for all we know he might be a wizened 80 year old given all his health problems), and not have any sort of understanding of human nature.

I think kewlJ doesn't understand why so many people here dislike him.

It's not just that he lies. We've had lots of liars on this forum.

It's the seriousness with which kewlJ tells these lies, and then lashes out at those who doubt them. There's a certain arrogance to those posts, in the tone, "Of course this is fucking true, and you're a complete idiot for even doubting this."

We can account for (but not excuse) the constant lying by accepting that he's pathological, but how to explain the complete lack of comprehending that no one believes anything he has to say, and that he's just digging himself further into a hole daily.

And by no one, I include V, because even he by now has come around to realize that something is rotten in the state of UNKewlJ (besides his tunnel rotted shoes) and is long past accepting the UNKewl lies without question.

It defies all logic (and math!) that anyone so indecisiveness, and blind to reading people could possibly be any kind of success in a casino table game environment, or really, be successful at most anything. Hence the obvious homeless tunnel dweller inevitability.

The thing about KJ - if you actually read what he writes - is that he constantly echoes the words/phrases and themes of the immediately previous replies by others. As I noted, a while back, he's extremely suggestible. Not someone in control of even his own life. People don't always end up in places like Vegas by their own conscious volition. My guess would be some nut-job living from one day to the next, now on the internet. Certainly of negligible intelligence, etc.

At the end of the day I sometimes have to remind myself kewl is an actual thinking and feeling person and not just some running internet gag which is more what he seems like.

[kewlJ]

lol right. Sometimes I'm bored AF and hitting this site a few times an hour sometimes not.

I can relate to this AinQ. The two people I live with are big "gamers" spending hours each night playing video games online with other online people. I am NOT a gamer. I spend my time in the same room (living room) watching sports from late afternoon on. And it is too easy not to log on for more entertainment here.

But here is a question for you AinQ. I don't know what your life is like, but do you ever take a trip or vacation somewhere? If so do you spend that same amount of time, trolling on the internet?

If you go back and look at the times I am out of town, on a trip to east coast, or the NW, you will notice I post much less. Maybe I log on once a day to once every few days, for a few minutes, but not like I do when I am home and bored.

So Mdawg claims he has been on a winter skiing trip to Tahoe for the last month. You know, expert skier and all. During that time he has posted over 280 times here and over 160 times at WoV. (WoV lower because he was suspended some of that time). I know Mdawg doesn't like it when we do that math, but that is 15+ times a day....while on vacation (supposedly).

Any thoughts???

[MDawg]

At the end of the day I sometimes have to remind myself kewl is an actual thinking and feeling person and not just some running internet gag which is more what he seems like.

I walk past the bum, doesn't mean I am guilted into giving him money.

[kewlJ]

I am glad you posted this Mdawg. 281 and counting BTW.

But here is the thing. You and Maxpen, on your behalf, and now even a few others post this silliness about homelessness, and tunnels and prostitution, that everyone knows is not true. It is soooooo 3rd grade and proves what a troll you are and what you will stoop to.

I have never needed to do this. I just pull the unrealistic nonsense from your posts, using your own words and claims, as I challenge it and you look foolish.

About the closest I have come to just flat-out 3rd grade trolling is comments about the coochie hooker stealing (your) watch. I don't know if that was actually, you, but if the police were doing a profile of the "john", it would fit you to a tee. I know others on these forums that I have spoken with believe in may very well be you as well.

That is the closest I have come. I could stoop to your level and post your 3rd grade stupid shit. i don't.