At the Glen, you would have already told us what it is, and, then, there would have come ten replies about others' experiences with variants of it. An actually live discussion. I guess, the reason that I was banned from a few of those boards for telling people not to play any system that they hadn't already proved out, in theory.
I think the universe is like a kaleidoscope with so many cross sections which by practicality will make making true sense of the universe impossible.
The universe cannot be one, it can only be 99.99% The way I see it, the universe cannot be defined at any moment if everything were frozen in time and space.
I think you're saying that there cannot be an objective reality and we are all living in our own subjective version of it. I agree with this, and also would add that we are all tied into a universal consciousness and as a result, have access to a deeper wisdom or intuition. But this of course has to be fully realized and accepted to have value in our daily lives.
"Universal consciousness?"
Pshaw...ain't no such thing.
Just animate beings and inanimate things existing then fading away.
Macht nichts.
Last edited by MisterV; 08-14-2024 at 11:39 AM.
What, Me Worry?
.
this is an example of the kind of posts that appear on the forum where Turbo was posting - it is a direct quote - I chose not to include the poster's screen name
what can you do if people wanna chase this kinna stuff_____? - you can do nothing - it will never end no matter what you post to criticize it
.
"Step two is to teach the characteristics of randomness. In a sense, like reading printed text is a form of an established syntax or construct, to read randomness you must have a construct for that. I developed a bunch of characteristics to watch for over the years. You hear people all the time with formations that they like, for instance, follow the last. That's nothing more than an item in a construct. The big picture is to see formations of continuation of any kind. Once you know what to look for then you look for the quality of the formation. I see singles and double or larger almost instantly. I can see it in your example once I transformed it into a visual dexterity format.
Here is an example that I love to see. When the weak side is hit, it always hits as a single while the strong side hits always at least more than once. To take advantage of that you just ride the wave in its evident form.
3.) So you get a get-out-of-jail-free card to rob a bank. What's your complaint? It's just laying there. All it takes is being trained in order to see it. If you know you are going to win the next 10 hands, because a perfect pattern keeps repeating, then why would you let the chance pass? All it takes is a single lost bet to know it ended. Meanwhile it could pay off for the next 10 or 20 hands. All I'm saying is that along with simple characteristics there includes the Elegant Pattern. There is the Global Effect too. It can be a 85% pure characteristic that goes on and on for an hour or more. But if you can't see it then there is no way to exploit that either. It's all about reading the landscape and being aware. I'm confounded why nobody has come along and establish this construct in over 200 years of gambling. Natural randomness produces far more opportunities than counting cards does in Blackjack. But the attack principle is the same. You bet big when you are in an opportunistic phase. I specialize in micro opportunities. There are things randomness does when you can't see continuation opportunities. All this is part of my construct. It's like playing lead guitar. You know how to improvise over the key and hit key tones in sequence with the music."
Last edited by Half Smoke; 08-14-2024 at 12:34 PM.
the foolish sayings of a rich man often pass for words of wisdom by the fools around him
I remember seeing his posts around too. It’s wild how some people just keep pushing their theories despite the odds. Sounds like he was convinced he had it figured out, but it’s a tough game where math usually wins. It’s sad to hear about his passing and the rumors around it.
The bots are getting better.
(Or botter, as Tasha would say).
Half Smoke, two things come to mind. You will NEVER accomplish anything you don't believe is possible. Nothing is random, there is only a lack of information to predict the outcome. Ex: it's widely known that RNGs do not produce random numbers, they only appear random to most observers.
Can you imagine being AI and reading all of this (which it undoubtedly already has)?
Sometime in the next 10-20 years, when AI makes the call as to whether we as a species should be allowed to fester, all of our foibles will be included in the decision. I have no real reason why AI should keep us around for any length of time, unless we're starring in some Flintstones remake for amusement. We don't even make good pets.
Never ceases to amaze me, but, people who truly believe the stuff above have no clue about keeping it to themselves. Certainly nuttier than just posting up one's pet roulette strategy.
And, almost as nutty as those religious songs, which I post to remind myself of just how nutty is every one, in one way, or another.
We, too, are inanimate, on a different level. Nothing is truly alive, or dead. Same as light is neither constant, nor eternal.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)