Bet on Kamala.....

[Rob.Singer]

.....and lose your ass. (Tasha, take note)

Not sure why asshats like Mark Cuban, Joy Reid, and Howard Stern don't get it yet, but they're in for a world of hurt in less than 2 weeks. I'm not saying that Trump will 100% actually make it to his Jan. swear-in ceremony because the Liberals in power just CANNOT allow him back into the White House to tear their corrupt playhouse down.

They WILL attempt to take him out again after he wins the election. Lets hope he makes it thru all the hate and lies. But if the savior of our country somehow continues to escape and defy, imagine the beautiful images on The View and MSNBC as they all down their cyanide capsules in glorious harmony, unable to cope with true decency being back in the Oval Office!

Yes libtards--fire up those pussified EV's, tighten up those old buttcheeks to hold those throbbing/bulging hemorrhoids in, and head on up to Canada for some safe-space blues.

It's gonna be F-U-N!!

[redietz]

LOL. Singer has done some decent writing in his life, but he may have topped himself in the paragraphs above.

I think Singer's a little too enthusiastic, but I'm the guy who listened to a Trump biography on tape while leisurely driving to the opening of the Taj Mahal back in whenever the hell it was (1990; I had to look it up). My compadre was the late Johny Mucha, who was a Trumpster fan. We rented a vehicle for the excursion, as damages were always a concern since we traveled a la Hunter Thompson (never stay in the same place more than two nights because one never knows who is following you).

Anyway, we were well aware of Trump's many foibles before the trip (such as his old man transferring money -- technically avoiding inheritance taxes -- into Don's name and things like the Trumpster calling in "anonymously" while discussing his own dating life on radio shows). My current better half was also privy to a call Trump made when trying to get a loan for a casino in LV. Very entertaining. Not exactly presidential, but what after all is "presidential?"

It is really quite a caveat against the current incarnation of the Dems that I, a dedicated socialist, strongly believe that the Trumpster is the only sane choice in a few weeks.

I will pay, as Singer said, to watch MSNBC on election night. I already have a few bucks on Mr. Trump, so the question is when and if I hedge.

On a serious note, it is really something that my intellectual position is that what has occurred recently vis-a-vis media and censorship and control is so insidious and far-reaching that my vote will go to Trump. But what I see from the "left" is worse than anything Orwell cooked up, and it'll just get worse, given the current trajectory.

[accountinquestion]

.....and lose your ass. (Tasha, take note)

Not sure why asshats like Mark Cuban, Joy Reid, and Howard Stern don't get it yet, but they're in for a world of hurt in less than 2 weeks. I'm not saying that Trump will 100% actually make it to his Jan. swear-in ceremony because the Liberals in power just CANNOT allow him back into the White House to tear their corrupt playhouse down.

They WILL attempt to take him out again after he wins the election. Lets hope he makes it thru all the hate and lies. But if the savior of our country somehow continues to escape and defy, imagine the beautiful images on The View and MSNBC as they all down their cyanide capsules in glorious harmony, unable to cope with true decency being back in the Oval Office!

Yes libtards--fire up those pussified EV's, tighten up those old buttcheeks to hold those throbbing/bulging hemorrhoids in, and head on up to Canada for some safe-space blues.

It's gonna be F-U-N!!

I didn't realize this is your stupid.

These clowns were all TDS TDS then after all the shit that has happened, no one would be motivated to take Trump out on their own. Never has there been a President so devisive.

[redietz]

Just because somebody wears a nametag that says "divisive" doesn't mean, objectively, that that person is the "most divisive." Maybe "most unapologetically divisive" would work, or maybe "called 'most divisive'" would be true, but superficial respectful words (aka "Singing Kumbaya") are no measure of divisive effects.

Hard to imagine anyone more "divisive" policy-wise than Lyndon Johnson. Hard to imagine anyone with more flashpoint "divisiveness" than Nixon. Carter created massive divisiveness while serving as a perfect example of textbook morals, honesty, and Christian values, which led to his landslide loss in the first election since 1932 in which an incumbent was beaten.

I think the labeling of Trump as "divisive" serves as little purpose as criticizing Jerry Springer for being "divisive" on his show. The divisions aren't about Trump or Springer. Those guys are just making a career out of riding the wave better than anybody else.

[MisterV]

Was any president more divisiive than Abraham Lincoln?

And yet..."Honest Abe" has gone down as arguably the "best" president in history.

As for Trump and Kamala: Neither is acceptable to me: l voted Libertarian.

[mcap]

LOL. Singer has done some decent writing in his life, but he may have topped himself in the paragraphs above.

I think Singer's a little too enthusiastic, but I'm the guy who listened to a Trump biography on tape while leisurely driving to the opening of the Taj Mahal back in whenever the hell it was (1990; I had to look it up). My compadre was the late Johny Mucha, who was a Trumpster fan. We rented a vehicle for the excursion, as damages were always a concern since we traveled a la Hunter Thompson (never stay in the same place more than two nights because one never knows who is following you).

Anyway, we were well aware of Trump's many foibles before the trip (such as his old man transferring money -- technically avoiding inheritance taxes -- into Don's name and things like the Trumpster calling in "anonymously" while discussing his own dating life on radio shows). My current better half was also privy to a call Trump made when trying to get a loan for a casino in LV. Very entertaining. Not exactly presidential, but what after all is "presidential?"

sorry Red,

most of that shit never happened

[The Boz]

Was any president more divisiive than Abraham Lincoln?

And yet..."Honest Abe" has gone down

And now Abe is being remembered for sucking cock. Sad what happened to his legacy, but hey, he made the choice to take it in the mouth and hoo hoo.

[Rob.Singer]

Red, I was also at the Taj Grand Opening, but it wasn't because of gambling or because I wanted to see & praise our future 45th & 47th president. I was at a conference in town.

I'm confident because there's no way more than half of US voters want to continue on with this middle and lower class-killing economy. Kamala said it starkly last week when asked what she would do differently than what the administration is and has been doing. Her reply "nothing comes to mind" told all Americans to expect high grocery, energy, renting, and home buying prices to continue to stay super high, which while inconsequential to people like us, wreck many others' lives.

You don't win elections with that kind of stupidity.

Get ready.....

[MisterV]

And now Abe is being remembered for sucking cock. Sad what happened to his legacy, but hey, he made the choice to take it in the mouth and hoo hoo.

That would explain where the expression "Lincoln log" got started.

Hey...were Abe really gay wouldn't he have wanted the South to rise again?

[DGenBen]

Actually if you look at all the evidence, James Buchanan was the most likely ex president to be gay.

Never married and lived with another non married man for a large part of his adult life.

Much of the evidence for Abraham Lincoln being gay was sharing his bed with a man who came to visit him.

But in those days heterosexual men in rural areas would often share beds as houses were small & there weren’t usually extra beds, guest rooms or couches.

Plus without central heating or space heaters it was even considered OK for men to spoon in those days, & even give each other a little tug.

[accountinquestion]

Just because somebody wears a nametag that says "divisive" doesn't mean, objectively, that that person is the "most divisive." Maybe "most unapologetically divisive" would work, or maybe "called 'most divisive'" would be true, but superficial respectful words (aka "Singing Kumbaya") are no measure of divisive effects.

Hard to imagine anyone more "divisive" policy-wise than Lyndon Johnson. Hard to imagine anyone with more flashpoint "divisiveness" than Nixon. Carter created massive divisiveness while serving as a perfect example of textbook morals, honesty, and Christian values, which led to his landslide loss in the first election since 1932 in which an incumbent was beaten.

I think the labeling of Trump as "divisive" serves as little purpose as criticizing Jerry Springer for being "divisive" on his show. The divisions aren't about Trump or Springer. Those guys are just making a career out of riding the wave better than anybody else.

It is true I should have prefaced my comment with not in my lifetime but I suspect if we could quantify it Trump would still be #1. I can give you a 100+ reasons why but I'm not a history guy to put it in context. Like I don't even know where to start .. it may not be policy based but ... if you haven't woke up and at least accepted the guy for what he is then there is nothing that can be explained to you at this point.

We live in some post-truth world.

[accountinquestion]

Was any president more divisiive than Abraham Lincoln?

And yet..."Honest Abe" has gone down

And now Abe is being remembered for sucking cock. Sad what happened to his legacy, but hey, he made the choice to take it in the mouth and hoo hoo.

Seriously? Is this a thing?

As to what is presidential or not - many many many look up to Trump. He's told thousands of lies by now publicly. This has noticeably changed the ethics of the people who worship him, IMO.

[accountinquestion]

Red, I was also at the Taj Grand Opening, but it wasn't because of gambling or because I wanted to see & praise our future 45th & 47th president. I was at a conference in town.

I'm confident because there's no way more than half of US voters want to continue on with this middle and lower class-killing economy. Kamala said it starkly last week when asked what she would do differently than what the administration is and has been doing. Her reply "nothing comes to mind" told all Americans to expect high grocery, energy, renting, and home buying prices to continue to stay super high, which while inconsequential to people like us, wreck many others' lives.

You don't win elections with that kind of stupidity.

Get ready.....

You stupid fucking retard. You can only blame what you understand. The problem is the disproportionate amount of disposable income the wealthy have which is in turn reinvested. What do they buy? Assets needed by the lower classes. Then we have trump giving them more tax breaks. The problem isn't the printed money if the lower class got their hands on equal shares - the problem is printed money winds up in the hands of the wealthy due to professionally managed tax avoidance and typically better returns.

I blame this on PE. You can go find dozens of PE firms having gutted hospitals. They take over funeral homes. They're not adding value for customers. Never has a PE firm takeover done that. Only free-market kool-aid loving simpletons believe that.

As inequality grows this whole process is compounded and allows the wealthy to do more rent seeking. Total race to the bottom for middle and own classes. Compound that with climate change related inflation/resource scarcity and it is gonna get fukkked

[pinchingyourballs]

The first draft of the Gettysburg Address had a whole section about the importance of caressing the balls, but it was omitted due to time constraints.

[Rob.Singer]

Red, I was also at the Taj Grand Opening, but it wasn't because of gambling or because I wanted to see & praise our future 45th & 47th president. I was at a conference in town.

I'm confident because there's no way more than half of US voters want to continue on with this middle and lower class-killing economy. Kamala said it starkly last week when asked what she would do differently than what the administration is and has been doing. Her reply "nothing comes to mind" told all Americans to expect high grocery, energy, renting, and home buying prices to continue to stay super high, which while inconsequential to people like us, wreck many others' lives.

You don't win elections with that kind of stupidity.

Get ready.....

You stupid fucking retard. You can only blame what you understand. The problem is the disproportionate amount of disposable income the wealthy have which is in turn reinvested. What do they buy? Assets needed by the lower classes. Then we have trump giving them more tax breaks. The problem isn't the printed money if the lower class got their hands on equal shares - the problem is printed money winds up in the hands of the wealthy due to professionally managed tax avoidance and typically better returns.

I blame this on PE. You can go find dozens of PE firms having gutted hospitals. They take over funeral homes. They're not adding value for customers. Never has a PE firm takeover done that. Only free-market kool-aid loving simpletons believe that.

As inequality grows this whole process is compounded and allows the wealthy to do more rent seeking. Total race to the bottom for middle and own classes. Compound that with climate change related inflation/resource scarcity and it is gonna get fukkked

One of the more satisfying parts of this election is watching those with liberal disease coming apart at the seams, then seeing & "feeling" their P-A-I-N on election night once they realize the candidate they hate, has won.

How do you know a liberal stopped by and got a good smacking? They include Climate Change within their word-salad answer.

And here's a teachable moment for you: Currently, the top 1% pay 45% of all taxes; 49% pay 55% of all taxes; and 50% of the people pay no taxes. When tax rates are lowered for corporations and the wealthy, that means they HIRE MORE EMPLOYEES and they get paid higher wages. Trump knows what he's doing, which was fully proven in his 1st term. Kamala? If she can't find a business genius or top economist to blow, then she'll forever duck and dodge questions on the economic problems she's created.

[The Boz]

Was any president more divisiive than Abraham Lincoln?

And yet..."Honest Abe" has gone down

And now Abe is being remembered for sucking cock. Sad what happened to his legacy, but hey, he made the choice to take it in the mouth and hoo hoo.

Seriously? Is this a thing?

As to what is presidential or not - many many many look up to Trump. He's told thousands of lies by now publicly. This has noticeably changed the ethics of the people who worship him, IMO.

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-...men-rcna169363

[redietz]

My personal bugaboo is censorship. As demonstrated by the pandemic government overreach when they had half the relevant facts wrong, nobody has a monopoly on the truth. Let facts battle it out. The strong-arm information-limiting tactics of the current Dem administration disqualify them from my vote. They were as bad as the Soviets at their height in terms of information suppression and party-line bullshit.

They still aren't reporting correctly on the biggest story of our lives -- the pandemic and the MRNA shots' (in)effectiveness for variations beyond the third incarnation of the virus.

[Rob.Singer]

And now Abe is being remembered for sucking cock. Sad what happened to his legacy, but hey, he made the choice to take it in the mouth and hoo hoo.

Seriously? Is this a thing?

As to what is presidential or not - many many many look up to Trump. He's told thousands of lies by now publicly. This has noticeably changed the ethics of the people who worship him, IMO.

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-...men-rcna169363

Many many many people look up to Trump because they see him for the very caring, very compassionate guy he really is. He helps many many people in need, which is why he's always being invited to ceremonies for veterans who died serving our country, to speak at eulogies and for victims of illegal aliens that the Biden-Harris administration allowed into this country, and as a representative for the families of fallen law enforcement officers around the country.

Few people know Trump chartered and paid for a flight for Nelson Mandela and his entourage to come to the US after being released from prison, while Joe Biden falsely claimed he traveled to S. Africa to help the guy get out. And how many people know that during Trump's visit to the stricken areas in the aftermath of the 2 latest hurricanes--where he donated several million dollars to citizens who lost everything--he also had the integrity to give $100,000 towards the effort of finding/helping/saving dogs left behind by cruel and assinine owners.

Would Kamala do any of this even if she had the resources? OF COURSE SHE WOULDN'T. All she knows how to do is claim "Trump's like Hitler!" which is one of many reasons why she hasn't a chance of winning.

[accountinquestion]

Red, I was also at the Taj Grand Opening, but it wasn't because of gambling or because I wanted to see & praise our future 45th & 47th president. I was at a conference in town.

I'm confident because there's no way more than half of US voters want to continue on with this middle and lower class-killing economy. Kamala said it starkly last week when asked what she would do differently than what the administration is and has been doing. Her reply "nothing comes to mind" told all Americans to expect high grocery, energy, renting, and home buying prices to continue to stay super high, which while inconsequential to people like us, wreck many others' lives.

You don't win elections with that kind of stupidity.

Get ready.....

You stupid fucking retard. You can only blame what you understand. The problem is the disproportionate amount of disposable income the wealthy have which is in turn reinvested. What do they buy? Assets needed by the lower classes. Then we have trump giving them more tax breaks. The problem isn't the printed money if the lower class got their hands on equal shares - the problem is printed money winds up in the hands of the wealthy due to professionally managed tax avoidance and typically better returns.

I blame this on PE. You can go find dozens of PE firms having gutted hospitals. They take over funeral homes. They're not adding value for customers. Never has a PE firm takeover done that. Only free-market kool-aid loving simpletons believe that.

As inequality grows this whole process is compounded and allows the wealthy to do more rent seeking. Total race to the bottom for middle and own classes. Compound that with climate change related inflation/resource scarcity and it is gonna get fukkked

One of the more satisfying parts of this election is watching those with liberal disease coming apart at the seams, then seeing & "feeling" their P-A-I-N on election night once they realize the candidate they hate, has won.

How do you know a liberal stopped by and got a good smacking? They include Climate Change within their word-salad answer.

And here's a teachable moment for you: Currently, the top 1% pay 45% of all taxes; 49% pay 55% of all taxes; and 50% of the people pay no taxes. When tax rates are lowered for corporations and the wealthy, that means they HIRE MORE EMPLOYEES and they get paid higher wages. Trump knows what he's doing, which was fully proven in his 1st term. Kamala? If she can't find a business genius or top economist to blow, then she'll forever duck and dodge questions on the economic problems she's created.

Lol still being so fucking simian.

As the rich gain more wealth relatively theyll pay even more taxes. So?

Still believing in trickle down..do you not notice how tech goes into getting rid of jobs? The rich aren't Gandalf with a jib making wand.

You are a good porch n.

Didn't understand math your whole life and no chance of it now.

[mcap]

oh my god, there's literally a politics subforum robert!