Originally Posted by
monet
Originally Posted by
MisterV
The covid epidemic was feared by the world when it broke out, and there was no agreed playbook.
Yeah, the pols "made it up as they went along."
So what?
What else could they do except try to "fight" the outbreak with fast-tracked vaccines?
That the government wanted all of us to take the jab makes sense, same as when they told us all to ration in WWII.
Sorry Red, but sometimes the dignity of the individual has to be sacrificed for the good of us all, even if it is a bit risky.
I get it that you didn't care for the intrusion into your life, but at the time covid was viewed as a potentially existential event requiring a unified response.
As far as this election spelling the death knell for the democrats: that ain't gonna happen; the only question is will they go down the more moderate or progressive road?
Trump Sees You.
Trump gonna put you in Ze Camp!
No more vroom vroom machines for you.
I'll be gentle to MrV. You have history wrong, and you are almost completely wrong about what I'm saying.
I'm not talking about the first 90 days of Covid. I'm talking about the fact that when you get to the mRNA shots, you are three to four major variations into the Covid virus. And those shots did little to no good overall. Initially, a benefit to older or immune compromised people. But a detriment to any males under 30. Once you get to the fourth and fifth major incarnations of the virus, negligible benefits, if any. According to some recent monstrous peer-reviewed papers, we're looking at 35 million worldwide deaths over about an 18-month period. About 10-12 million assigned to Covid as cause of death; another 14-15 million assigned to issues with the mRNA shots. The rest due to sundry and various. All speculative, but damning.
Oh, I guess this paper, all 500 pages or thereabouts, didn't get a review on CNN. Surprise, surprise.
And then you censor social media and run public campaigns that turn out to be mainly wrong. You also demonize people who, in the long run, were more right than you. You think censoring people like Brett Weinstein was a good thing. He's an evolutionary biologist who was more right than the NIH. Plenty of people in that category. To censor them was flat-out authoritarian, Soviet Union circa 1975.
You think the federal government gets to lie about a virus' origins, lie about what their shots can do and for how long, and that's better than allowing people to make their own calls using their own judgement?
Sorry, V, this is why Trump is back in the White House. People can make their own decisions about what to put in their bodies.
Reply With Quote