Machines do not have hot/cold cycles, player's do. During any good streak or bad streak the same hands are all available as the RNG cycles through hundreds of thousands of numbers. When you are having a good streak it is your own timing that produces it. Had you hit the keys slightly different you could experience a bad streak during the same time frame.
I downloaded an RNG and looked at the return through various hundred thousand hand continuous periods. The difference was usually only a couple percent (at most). That was quite a while ago and really proved beyond any doubt that it is not the machine.
There's nothing that guarantees a player is going to have a good streak. The odds are actually better they will have bad streaks. Hence, you never reach a win goal and leave with a loss. These losses match the fewer times you do have good cards and manage to hit a win goal. Overall it all averages out to your own personal ER over time.
I have no problem with Singer being lucky. I have a problem with him claiming that others will get lucky playing his system.
As I've said many times, I don't even have a problem with a progressive if a player is comfortable with it. For the gazillionth time, I simply want you to understand that none of that is going to change a person's future expectation.
Yup, and now he has another problem: damage control
I guess by "he" Singer must be referring to himself. After all he is the one that claims, not only that hot/cold machines are real, but that he can detect them. The actual mapping of the RNG that I did proves beyond any doubt that he is lying. Now, back to Robbie for some more "damage control".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)