Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: The Church of Rob

  1. #1
    Some of you may have seen those books for "The Church of Bob." Well, I suggest we drop all pretense of logical or rational defenses of Rob Singer's play strategy and just flat out admit we want a "Church of Rob."

    The man circumvents the laws of probability. In Marvel Comics, that character is the Scarlet Witch, a mutant. Well, maybe Rob's a mutant, too.

    In any case, if Rob can indeed do what he says he can do, he has super powers, and I'll be the first in line to worship him. I think each of us believers should liquidate our resources, hand them over to Rob, and watch the magic. I suggest we let Rob handle our resources and be in charge of them 24/7. Of course, so nothing bad happens to Rob, since he's our golden goose, we assign a couple of people to always be with him.

    With great power, as Spider-man says, comes great responsibility, however. Rob will take our pooled resources, and win for us, and for the Church of Rob. If he turns out to be a false prophet, however, we do what the bible says we should do with false prophets. W* **** **m.

    Sound like a plan?
    Last edited by Alan Mendelson; 11-08-2012 at 10:34 AM. Reason: Just one step over the line. Careful.

  2. #2
    For some odd reason I doubt Rob would sign up for this program.

  3. #3
    I have offered a similar thought before. Rob's followers are like cult members, and you could say he has created a cult of true believers. But, he is a likeable guy and is sincere in what he believes. I have never criticized anyone for their religious beliefs, and if they want to believe in the Church of Rob I will respect that and defend their religious freedom.

  4. #4
    If anyone or any group wants to make at least $25000, I'll be happy to play ten sessions of SPS with witnesses, and to show good faith I will contribute 25% of the bankroll to accomplish that. But again, it will have to be on my schedule and where I choose to play, since we now have a new retirement life and I don't just sit around all day waiting to step into the grave. 3 months notice please.

  5. #5
    How much of a bankroll is required to "make at least $25000"??

  6. #6
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    If anyone or any group wants to make at least $25000, I'll be happy to play ten sessions of SPS with witnesses, and to show good faith I will contribute 25% of the bankroll to accomplish that. But again, it will have to be on my schedule and where I choose to play, since we now have a new retirement life and I don't just sit around all day waiting to step into the grave. 3 months notice please.
    If your system is what you say it is, and you are what you say you are, you will front all the money necessary to "make $25,000" on behalf of your investors. When the $25,000 goal is achieved, you will be reimbursed for your outlay (up to whatever amount it is at that moment but not to exceed $25,000). Your wages for your efforts will be the opportunity to prove yourself to your doubters, which is more valuable than money. (Of course, you will not be offered any tip from your investors. It just wouldn't be the proper thing to do in a casino.) Clearly, this is a win-win for all involved.
    Last edited by Vegas Vic; 11-08-2012 at 02:00 PM.

  7. #7
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    How much of a bankroll is required to "make at least $25000"??
    The strategy requires 3X a single session bankroll of $57,200, so it's the same $171,200 I used for 11 years.

  8. #8
    Originally Posted by Vegas Vic View Post
    If your system is what you say it is, and you are what you say you are, you will front all the money necessary to "make $25,000" on behalf of your investors. When the $25,000 goal is achieved, you will be reimbursed for your outlay (up to whatever amount it is at that moment but not to exceed $25,000). Your wages for your efforts will be the opportunity to prove yourself to your doubters, which is more valuable than money. (Of course, you will not be offered any tip from your investors. It just wouldn't be the proper thing to do in a casino.) Clearly, this is a win-win for all involved.
    Forgive me, but you sound like a cheapskate. I'm in full retirement now and this home (rig) was an expensive outlay and as such, I put most of my gambling bankroll back into investments. I simply cannot afford anything more than a quarter of the required $171k these days without dipping into my account early. Besides, will winning minimum $25k over ten sessions be enough for the critics to say they'll eat crow?

  9. #9
    Well, $171,000 is a little much for me even if you can guarantee a $25,000 profit. You are talking about a return of a bit less than 15% and while there is nothing wrong with a 15% return, the idea of risking $171,000 in a casino to gain $25,000 is not something I would recommend. So I'd rather stick with something that involves a lower up-front expenditure.

    Even the idea of earning $2,500 with a $17,100 bankroll is not an attractive "casino proposition." (Ten percent of your original amounts.)

    I will have to leave the "professional gambling" to others. With the "numbers" you are talking about, I will remain a recreational player who hopes for the best.

  10. #10
    I understand your point of view Alan, which is why I think redietz opened it up for " come one, come all".

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •