The Adventures of MDawg (in progress)

[redietz]

It was a dark and stormy night at Chinook Winds casino; spume from the pounding surf wafted like light fog and coated the handrail I was holding.

So slippery.

"Jeeves, bring the sedan chair, and take me to my machine."

My slaves transported me through the maw of the casino and took me to the only game I care to play, a slot machine called "Wizard of Odds."

It's an older game, the object of which is to overwhelm the other players with inane claims of derring-do while destroying the forum via continuous babbling, groundless brags, heroic challenges and gobs of library paste.

I reached into my vest pocket and procured one dollar: that's all I ever need.

First bet and BAM, winner, winner, who's a sinner?

Second bet and BAM won again.

*Yawn*

Over the next half hour I won every pull, as always; my slaves were kept busy taking my winning tickets to the cashier to be cashed in and exchanged for stuffed animals, toy planes, and of course Pez candy.

One of the slaves, a brute named SlouchBelly, was slouching a bit too much for my pleasure so I gave him a couple of well-placed lashes with the bull whip: a look of rapture spread across his face.

The casino patrons watched in fear, as well they might: it could be their turn next.

"Jeeves, I am thirsty."

Immediately he brought me a flask of hummingbird tears; I quaffed the draft.

Satisfied, it was time to leave this hell hole and return to my lakeside estate where I'd once again corner the market.

This gambling, this investing, it is getting so boring, winning all the time; it might be nice to lose once in a while.

Nah, who am I kidding?

It's great to be me!

Now, where's that junior high school?

I feel lucky.

This is excellent! I had actually forgotten what those chairs are called, and my late wife was an archaelogist, so there's no excuse.

I suspect we'll find out our protagonist slides down a pole to enter the Dawg Cave at some point. His rogues' gallery includes all those evil bastards who win via skill, math, and burning calories, which of course are outlawed in Gotham, where the only spandex sold is extra large.

Keep it coming! And I need to get myself one of them thar sedan chairs. I bet Phil Hellmuth owns one of those.

[MDawg]

Interesting how the ones who CLAIM to have me blocked, including jbjb, UNKewlJ and MisterV, spend the most time writing about me.

They drive 'em to me!

I like that TZ episode too. Along with the one about the guy who is able to control the dice with telekinesis. The Prime Mover. Sometimes at the tables I felt as if I had that power, able to CALL 'EM, seriously, 6 2 on the hop, etc. etc. And then...other times...it felt as if some sort of telekinesis were working against me, making the dice come up 7 every three rolls.

[Dan Druff]

What's this talk about "my forum" I don't have any forum. I post at other forums I don't own any of these forums I post at.

But, you'd better all be nice to me or I'll buy VCT and boot some of you. Everything is available...for a price. Or maybe just go in and change the posts of the ratfinks who call casino security to suit their ratfink mentality. You know how ratfinks tend to wake up (or rather, not wake up) with a rat in their slit throats don't you?

Some people believe this was a death threat, but I don't think so. It's just MDawg posturing as the super-rich guy who can buy anything, even this forum.

Suffice to say that this forum isn't for sale, and if I did ever sell it, I would only do so to a neutral party who hasn't had previous issues with others here. This isn't going to become MDawgCasinoTalk.com or SingerCasinoTalk.com.

[coach belly]

Some people believe this was a death threat

Who believes that this was a death threat, and how do you know who believes that?

[MisterV]

Who believes that this was a death threat, and how do you know who believes that?

It was that no good, low down bat fink, that's who.

See post 2715.

Get your head out of your ass, open your eyes and read threads before you reply.

"Holy short bus, Batman, he's denser than osmium!"

[coach belly]

Who believes that this was a death threat, and how do you know who believes that?

It was that no good, low down bat fink, that's who.

See post 2715.

Get your head out of your ass, open your eyes and read threads before you reply.

Christ on a crutch ...

I can't view that post on my device.

I don't know who bat fink is.

I can read that Dan Druff doesn't think there was a death threat.

Are there members who believe there was a death threat, and who are they?

[MaxPen]

Who believes that this was a death threat, and how do you know who believes that?

It was that no good, low down bat fink, that's who.

See post 2715.

Get your head out of your ass, open your eyes and read threads before you reply.

Christ on a crutch ...

I can't view that post on my device.

I don't know who bat fink is.

I can read that Dan Druff doesn't think there was a death threat.

Are there members who believe there was a death threat, and who are they?

Why do you always go full retard?

[coach belly]

Why do you always go full retard?

What you are talking about?

Dan Druff wrote...

Some people believe this was a death threat

I asked...who are these people?

Mr V answered...

It was that no good, low down bat fink

Who is bat fink?

I don't know who that is, I can't find anything written here by bat fink.

I can't find any reference at all to any bat fink, other than Mr V's.

How does anybody know that bat fink believes there was a death threat made?

[MaxPen]

You were directed to read post #2715 in this thread. How hard is that?

[coach belly]

You were directed to read post #2715 in this thread.

#2715 is a cartoon.

The caption shows a conversation between comic book characters,
and there's no mention of any bat fink.

Some people believe this was a death threat

Who are these people that believe there was a death threat,
and how would Druff know what those people believe?

I'm sure he wasn't referring to the comic book characters.

Was a member privately accused of making a death threat?

Who made the accusation?

[redietz]

You were directed to read post #2715 in this thread.

#2715 is a cartoon.

The caption shows a conversation between comic book characters,
and there's no mention of any bat fink.

Some people believe this was a death threat

Who are these people that believe there was a death threat,
and how would Druff know what those people believe?

I'm sure he wasn't referring to the comic book characters.

Was a member privately accused of making a death threat?

Who made the accusation?

LOL. So let's get this straight. On Forum A, coach belly is concerned that a forum member is perhaps being threatened (although not directly or obviously). And the threat is doxing. On Forum B, coach belly is concerned that a forum member is accusing a poster of making a threat (of killing someone). Coach asks for the identity of the accuser who reported the threatening poster.

Forum B is this one, in case things are confusing or coach seems inconsistent. Coach really isn't being inconsistent. You see, in Forum A, the posters who he sees as being threatened are "friends" of MDawg. In Forum B, the poster "doing the threatening" is MDawg.

No inconsistency there at all.

[coach belly]

On Forum B, coach belly is concerned that a forum member
is accusing a poster of making a threat (of killing someone).
Forum B is this one

I wouldn't agree that I'm concerned,
but I'm interested...are they the same thing?

I'm interested to know how this came to Druff's attention,
and who brought it to his attention.

He could have stumbled across the cartoon, but I don't know,
and that's why I asked.

Which is Forum A?

[kewlJ]

I'm interested to know how this came to Druff's attention,
and who brought it to his attention.

Why on earth would you thing that any of your business? That sounds like a private conversation between someone that may have been concerned and Dan Druff, if there was in fact someone that contacted Dan with concerns.

You are not a lawyer (that you have mentioned) and if you are, you are not representing someone on this forum, so just stop with all your idiotic shit and game playing on both forums. You are just a fucking tard, you really are!

[AxelWolf]

#2715 is a cartoon.

The caption shows a conversation between comic book characters,
and there's no mention of any bat fink.

Some people believe this was a death threat

Who are these people that believe there was a death threat,
and how would Druff know what those people believe?

I'm sure he wasn't referring to the comic book characters.

Was a member privately accused of making a death threat?

Who made the accusation?

LOL. So let's get this straight. On Forum A, coach belly is concerned that a forum member is perhaps being threatened (although not directly or obviously). And the threat is doxing. On Forum B, coach belly is concerned that a forum member is accusing a poster of making a threat (of killing someone). Coach asks for the identity of the accuser who reported the threatening poster.

Forum B is this one, in case things are confusing or coach seems inconsistent. Coach really isn't being inconsistent. You see, in Forum A, the posters who he sees as being threatened are "friends" of MDawg. In Forum B, the poster "doing the threatening" is MDawg.

No inconsistency there at all.

WELL YEAH, DUH!

[jbjb]

Why on earth would you thing that any of your business? That sounds like a private conversation between someone that may have been concerned and Dan Druff, if there was in fact someone that contacted Dan with concerns.

You are not a lawyer (that you have mentioned) and if you are, you are not representing someone on this forum, so just stop with all your idiotic shit and game playing on both forums. You are just a fucking tard, you really are!

And yet, you keep quoting and responding to his trolling. Use that "There are other players at the table?" mantra and block/ignore the fucktard!

[kewlJ]

And yet, you keep quoting and responding to his trolling. Use that "There are other players at the table?" mantra and block/ignore the fucktard!

So happens I don't buy that "There are other players at the table?" reasoning, as I recently discussed. Sure it is cute to say that, even to pretend that their aren't or that they have no effect on anything. But it simply isn't true. The example I give is secondary attention: Say I split 10's which is something I rarely do, but want the option to do so in the right circumstances. So, it goes south as it sometimes does. Either the 7 or 8 that I drew to my 10's would have busted the dealer with his 6 up and 10 in the hole. But the third card out was a 4 or 5. Those other players at the table that aren't there are now bitching and moaning to the point that pit critter wonders over taking a look, when he otherwise wouldn't have noticed an attention drawing splitting of 10's.

That is just one example, there are are concerns like fewer rounds played deeper into decks, especially at double deck games. I mean if you are talking about do other players decisions to hit or stand effect you, no of course not, not in the long run, except marginally, when they take a card late in the shoe that had they not taken could have lead to another round.

So, it is cute to say "there are other players at the table?", but truth is they can effect your game.

[coach belly]

Why on earth would you thing that any of your business?

The forum owner indicated that a member has been accused of a crime.

I'm advocating that the accused be afforded the opportunity to confront his accusers.

He can't do that unless his accusers are named.

This is a societal principle that dates back to Biblical times.

In my opinion, this should be a matter of interest to all members.

If you're not interested, then you don't need to comment further,
unless you can't manage your impulse control disorder.

[Mission146]

Why on earth would you thing that any of your business?

The forum owner indicated that a member has been accused of a crime.

I'm advocating that the accused be afforded the opportunity to confront his accusers.

He can't do that unless his accusers are named.

This is a societal principle that dates back to Biblical times.

In my opinion, this should be a matter of interest to all members.

If you're not interested, then you don't need to comment further,
unless you can't manage your impulse control disorder.

1.) Only applies for the purposes of court and if you're talking to the cops.

2.) In some states, that's not even true to begin with.

3.) Why do you want everyone's names so badly?

[coach belly]

1.) Only applies for the purposes of court and if you're talking to the cops.

2.) In some states, that's not even true to begin with.

3.) Why do you want everyone's names so badly?

I see that you're still encouraging tattle tales.

I'm not advocating a legal application, it's a societal principle,
it applies beyond your pigeon hole.

I don't want everyone's names so badly. What's the basis of your question?

[MisterV]

I'm advocating that the accused be afforded the opportunity to confront his accusers. He can't do that unless his accusers are named. This is a societal principle that dates back to Biblical times..

This is a gambling forum, not a court of law.

There is no right to due process in this, the court of public opinion.

OK, let the Inquisition continue.

"Tie that wastrel to the rack, and set it on "10."

"We've no use for wannabe throat slitters, they'd just stink up the place."