Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
The only interesting post here is Axel's catch of Rob saying his betting system would have lost over time. Does this mean from AP style of playing or his actual play with win goal/loss limit style of play? I believe this to be an answer of supreme importance.

Slingshot, That is nothing new. Every AP and math guy already knew this long go. THAT is exactly why we find Rob's claims so objectionable. They defy math and logic.

I will go as far to say, YOU, one of the few that supports him and his crap already knew this. When Rob first revealed this DU bug, YOU were offended that his changing story meant that the play you were supporting was phony. You even used some strong terminology along the lines that you had been "lied to". Then as time went on, inexplicably you seemed to fall back in line again.

There is an old saying "fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me". Well I don't think he is any longer "fooling you", but for some reason, you are having a real hard time seeing the truth vs what you want (or wanted) to believe.