Originally Posted by redietz View Post
The two things I find most interesting about the entire Singer expose have to do with belief systems, commitment to prior opinions, definitions, and evidence:

1) Despite overwhelming immediate evidence, some of the same people who have consistently denigrated 18 yo's as asinine (and it is -- ed.) not only refused to accept the completely obvious with these photos, they sprinkled the thread with maybe's, perhaps's, and some kind of parallel universe possibility of an explanation. It should be as embarrassing as defending 18 consecutive yo's.

2) Dan Druff, who runs pokerfraudalert and devotes considerable time to the integrity of poker, bans "mickey's clit" for "trolling," but does NOT immediately ban somebody who clearly lied to every forum poster for hundreds if not thousands of posts and created completely fictional self-promoting narratives for a decade on the site. Not only did this person promote his own fictional narratives, he has lied hundreds if not thousands of times about legitimate gamblers on this site who know what they're doing. But this poster, as opposed to "mickey's clit," is not banned. So if it ain't poker, it ain't lying, I guess.
The two things I find very interesting these days are:

1) Slant Eyed People

2) Slurping Noodles