Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
This is interesting. I wonder if you might want to rephrase this, Arc, based on the other thread and the discussion about a game that is supposed to be a 100%+ game? You agreed that it would be difficult to come out ahead on that other game at the bar, yet here you say win goals are worthless for positive games. The point is, you don't necessarily win at positive games, do you? Otherwise, you wouldn't have said this in the the other thread:
Some games may be >100% on paper but still not positive to most gamblers. That was what the words after "I agree" was supposed to communicate.