Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post

Like I pointed out before, the image is not squared up against the photographer, it is at an oblique angle.

Given it was not taken straight on I question how the ghostly image of the person in the center could be the photographer, who was to the side, not directly in front.

The reflected image is of the person sitting at the machine, not the photographer standing to his side.
Exactly,,,, the only people who can't see that are our ace investigative reporter and the hobo planted firmly on Rob's 9.5.[/QUOTE]

If you can't see that the guy taking the picture, aka my son, has both arms raised while holding his phone, it's because once again, it's something that hurts way too much to admit. So then tell us, oh man of all answers, WTF is he doing with his arms raised up--holding a cocktail waitress's ass? And if he's seated, WTF difference does that matter. I already said I was with the suits and attendants taking care of the paperwork.

As for the assumed angle--why don't you morons get one of your local "experts" to analyze the picture rather than making yourself look so foolish.

You still haven't answered, and I'll press you until you either do or your headache makes your eyeballs pop out: are you going to admit to what I said? And are you going to force the pipsqueak to be there or else?