Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post

Zero risk? WHAT? Are you an advantage player AinQ? I ask sincerely. I don't know. I thought I read you say you were but not fulltime, which is fine. But I have to question anyone that thinks there is zero risk for any AP, posting and proving what you are asking. There is substantial risk.




Singer has posted a bill of sale with 3 different people's signatures in the same handwriting. He has posted pictures of fake movie prop money. He has posted pictures of himself inside an RV at the dealership. Are you seriously using the words "evidence" and "legitimacy" related to this person and his actions?

Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
If none of it matters then why are you stuck on disproving others? "No one is on trial" but yet you go on and on over Singer and Mdawg.
I have challenged both Singer's and Mdawg's ridiculous claims. Probably for way longer than I should. But both do this thing where they just keep repeating the claims long after they have even exposed themselves. they are like the energizer bunny. As long as they keep repeating, I feel like I have the right to keep challenging and pointing out the ridiculous of them. But I have never, ever asked for prove from either.
Dan Druff has been involved intimately with forums for the near 20 years I've been acquainted with him. Find me one time where someone has had an issue with him involving some form of trust. I don't think you will. There is NO substantial risk. IMO there is near 0 risk. The fact of the matter is I seriously doubt Todd gives much of a shit who you are. I don't.

There is only risk in your head aka Excuseville aka the Land of the Liars.

I'm not asking for proof. I don't need proof. Just like you - I am simply challenging and pointing out the ridiculousness in someone.

I dunno.. perhaps I should be a nice person and just let you go off living your fantasy.

Next time you want to tell a whopper, talk to me and lets walk through it. I'll only charge you $200.