Anyway, to those with actual knowledge of contemporary betting -
I have always found the entitlement behind 'every bettor should have the same limits and never be kicked off' a bit comical. As if sportsbooks aren't simply businesses. It is like the poker player who thinks he should be allowed into any game. There is a meta-game for all the best to keep doing what they do. If you want to tongue in cheek say you can't drive these people to illegal sports books ok wink wink but the illegal books won't want their action either. If you really truly believe this stuff then lol.
However INCREASING limits for suckers is something that I find disturbing. It is not that different from things casinos do with Hosts perhaps, but it does rub me the wrong way. Kick off winners but don't enable losers to bet more. If you're going to raise limits it should be based on some sort of credit/income verification system. I don't think I had an appreciation for that until I just saw Mickey mention it. I guess that doesn't server the interest of pro-bettors though, so you don't see the point brought up... hah
Reply With Quote