First of all, you won't find a single post among the "many, many" of mine that refers to me as either "great" or "famous." So that is a problem with your summary. If you don't report the truth, why should someone respond? Slopping around with subjective inaccurate summaries while getting facts wrong does no one a service. A real problem, actually, from a journalistic perspective. It's a problem because if you think Google is a substitute for actual research, you are sorely mistaken. Actual research requires phone calls, emails, checking sources and rechecked sources, then doing followup. It requires journalism and scholarship, not hitting a couple of buttons. The problem with this forum is meta. -- the previous owner was a journalist. Whatever his gambling deficiencies, he had an idea how research should function.