Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
He uses his real name and despite his seemingly high opinion of himself I question whether a court would consider him a "public figure" for purposes of defamation, so IN THEORY he COULD bring a claim for libel but obviously it's just bluster.

KJ immediately explained his mistaken belief which led to the post in question...so there's that.

More importantly is the fact that someone claiming they were libeled must prove not only a libelous statement but also damages flowing from it, and that he cannot do.

Oh yeah...he'd need to have a lot of money to pay a lawyer....
The unfortunate point for redietz was that he did not intend it as bluster, he really meant it.

Handicapper, handicap thyself.