Originally Posted by OnceDear View Post
Hi Rob,
For the elimination of doubt, nothing about any agers.
The original question verbatim from Alan's first post:-


The original question as posed on Wizard's forum first post:-


Verbatim the same.

Quite different to the one on your comments page: I don't know where that came from.

There was never a question about 'the second die' being a two.

There was a question about the remaining pair of dice :-

'What is the probability that both dice are showing a 2?'

There was never any mention of taking or setting aside one of the dice. There was never actually mention of 'peeking at ONE of the dice' in the OQ
It's easy to see why this isn't going as smoothly as it should. I can't post on WoV and I'm not reading everything that's said there, while Alan's running ragged between the two forums with info and more info. All I can say about the issue is what I've been saying here all along--not what some of the WoV idiots are claiming I said or pasting bits of altered posts there that I made here.

What the geniuses there are missing is that I'm using this dice issue/bet to finally get them to have the balls to back up their cowardly anonymous lies that I can't win using the Singer Play Strategy in a session. They backed out before banning me, so I'm giving them another opportunity to back up their lies. I don't care about $10 a roll whether the odds are 6-1 or 9-1 or 11-1 on a remaining die, or whether it's still, still spinning, or re-rolled. This dice problem has been interesting and thought-provoking, but I'm not a dice guy. I am and have always been a far better video poker player--with the winnings and the life to prove it--than anyone on the wizard's forum. They rely on the safety of anonymity from hiding behind their computers. I don't.