Originally Posted by regnis View Post
Nothing in the definition of quit implies returning to do the activity later.

Stick to math arc---nothing in the definition implies permanency either. Trust a lawyer on this---this is how you lose cases. The judge needs facts, not vagueness. But also it appears you googled the definition and if so, read further into the explanations and examples.
Being more technical leads me to using words that are more descriptive of events. Hence, to "quit" sounds much more permanent that "pause" or "delay". Technical writers always try to use the most descriptive terms. We can see from Alan's words that he is confusing himself by using the word "quit" when he really means "pause" or "delay".