Originally Posted by
redietz
To this degree, I agree with coach belly. I do not think Rob lied about himself. In other words, all of the speculations regarding arci and advantage video poker players, and other people, because they were presented as facts, could be considered lies. But I don't think Rob would consider himself a liar in that he very carefully avoided specifics regarding himself. Those three "mathematicians?" Never named, for example. Rob may have been counting his accountant, his son-in-law, and the neighbor kid taking eighth grade geometry, but they could all be considered "mathematicians," since the word itself does not necessarily refer to professionalism or any accreditation. Number of sessions won and amounts? Nothing ever precisely claimed. Times the martingale failed? Always avoided, but he never said it had never failed. He simply said the big wins outnumber the big losses by a lot. True, in terms of number of wins versus number of losses. But not necessarily true, in fact probably false, if net dollars total are the criteria. Rob never made it the criteria. Again, there is probably a reason for that.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote