Why is Rob allowed to post here?

[redietz]

The way I remember it.
1. There was a period of time when his strategy was discussed-and the posts are on this forum.
2. Then there was a period where "math" and derogatory remarks were used to downplay and "disprove" the strategy.
3. Now when the tables turn, no one wants to hear what they once were guilty of- filthy, stupid, senseless remarks.

Sling, you need a double shot of a good dose of reality. Singer's bs has been going on in the forums for 15 years. Go read the early days of FREEvpFREE or LVA Sports or WoV where Rob is involved. Countless individuals have tried to debate with Rob over the merit's of Rob's tactics at video poker. It starts along the lines of "Mr. Singer, I disagree with your tactics at video poker and here is why...." and Rob's response is along the lines of "You filthy disgusting addicted gambler...."

Rob has made countless attacks on Bob Dancer and Jean Scott over the years calling them filthy disgusting addicted gamblers. But have you ever read anything from them attacking him. No, you haven't. A prime example is kewlj, a new member here. Without provocation Rob made a gratuitous blistering attack on him.

Sling, you really need to wake up and smell the coffee. You need to start dealing with reality. Singer's system should of made you rich by now if it really works. Instead of doing it once a week like Rob said he did you could do it once a day, twice a day, and in short order you should have parlayed up to the 1/2/5/10/25/100 level that Rob said he played at. And then hit the big time. But you haven't done that have you?

Sling, do you have any bankroll at all? What did you say Singer has done for you?

I thought you were on the wagon??

Your problem with what sling does us you can't separate someone who's addicted to the machines like you are, from someone who does it only for low-level entertainment when they have the time to do it. Yet at the same time you readily deflect the fact that I indeed worked the strategy very successfully for ten years, and I've done even better since then by using ARTT.

Your a bad apologist for Dancer and now Jean Scott. They've both spewed lies about me many times on various forums. Only difference? Dancer's were gate & envy-based; Jean's were dunce-like. You know, sort of like the nonsense you come out with---drunk OR sober.

So Bob Dancer envies Rob Singer? And he wants your gate? Is that a code for one of those swinger abodes out on Boulder Highway? Or are you saying you swing both ways, like a gate, and Dancer envies your ability to go back and forth?

Help me out, man. I don't get any of this.