Tracking multiple BJ tables - Richard Munchkin

[kewlJ]

The photos were not taken from an end seat.

That is a lie Alan! That photo of yours that I reposted yesterday is taken from first base. You were standing directly behind the first seat. There is no other possible way that the seat in the forefront, which is 3rd base at the next table, can be in the forefront and middle of the picture UNLESS the photo is taken from first base (or standing just behind it). It's just impossible. (18 y.o.'s in a row type impossible)

I've been asking other forum members to look for themselves. Have none of you been in a casino since this discussion started?

Alan there is a very small membership here and only a couple even play blackjack and most of the members don't care bout this discussion. I wish a few more had spoken up, but they haven't. A couple people, like RS have said that they have tracked a second table, while playing one and you completely dismissed and ignored them. And now a publicly know professional blackjack player and AP (not much blackjack these days) Richard Munchkin has confirmed that he did it regularly AND That many professional blackjack players have been doing this for 40 years! And Munchkin qualifies as a bit of a blackjack historian because he interviewed a number of well know professional players for his book. What more do you want? There is apparently nothing that will satisfy you!

You've admitted the information you can gather at a second table is limited. That tells me you can't have an accurate count.

This is clear evidence that you have no idea what you are talking about. This statement that you have repeated over and over is just NOT true. Numerous blackjack players and math guys have tried to explain it to you, but you either don't listen, don't understand or just aren't willing to accept the truth.

Anyone can go to the casinos you mentioned on the West side of the Strip and see for themselves that the tables are too far apart. Then they can observe for themselves when the dealers deal -- and they would have to be in sync for you to accomplish what you claim.

You are repeating and we have covered this. I too wish a few people would have weighed in, including looking for themselves and even taking their own pictures. But they haven't. This a is a small site with a handful of members and most don't care and have tired of this discussion. But you deceitfully try to paint that as no one backing me up. NO ONE has backed you up either. (although you conveniently leave that out).

Frankly you just can't deal with someone saying the emperor has no clothes.

Don't be goofy. I'll see your "emporer with no cloths" and raise you a "There is no one so blind as he who will not see".

I don't fall for your bullshit.

No you don't "fall for" nor are interested in the truth. You predetermined an opinion and refuse to acknowledge all evidence that doesn't support your 'alternative reality'.

And regarding the package, Tony told me what was there. I didn't have to see it. Redietz wouldn't post it, so you expected me to post it? No. If it's so important let redietz post it or let him send it to you so you can post it.

I am not even going to rehash the package again. It all there. Everyone knows how you deceitfully tap danced and played games. Should we take a poll and ask the small membership here if you were honest with redietz? (and the rest of us for that matter). It would be the same results as the 18 y.o.'s poll all over again.

Now grow up.

Back at ya. Be honest for once.