Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
Unless Singer defines the term "total win from over all years" as being his NET win, i.e. the amount left after subtracting all losses from all wins, I submit that the smoke still occludes one's view of the mirrors in Singerland.
I have also raised this possibility, MrV.

Singer had a high paying career in business. No one is disputing that. I am sure that provided him with a nice pension and/or retirement or buyout or whatever. He often says he has or had more money than he would be able to spend.

So let's say he takes 2 million and plays VP with it. Over the years he "wins" a million dollars or whatever amount he wants to claim. Not net winnings of course. So when you subtract the play to get those "winnings" you are left with a negative. So his 2 million dollar starting BR is now 1 million after his 1 million or 1.5 million in "winnings".

We will refer to this as 'Singer Math', since he refuses to use real mathematics.