Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
Here's it is again:

I'm out to win a minimum $2500 with a $57.2k bankroll each session. Not so automatic on a single denomination, but within a complicated structured strategy (which none of the Einstein's here or at WoV could ever figure out) that increases and decreases in denomination and game volatility during each session, the goal becomes very simple indeed. But the one constant we have is how everyone agrees there is a very high probability of winning a single session. At least, until they begin to realize what that might mean, which is where they put on the emergency brakes before crashing.

This then transforms into the question that no one has ever attempted to answer, which I suspect is due to fear, embarrassment, or just plain not wanting the answer to be what it so obviously is: If one session has such an easy chance of attaining the win goal--whether it be $2507, $4982, $11,385, $28,443, $59,000, $97,211 or greater....then why would you suddenly NOT expect the probability of winning the NEXT session to continue to overwhelmingly be on my side? Or the next one. Or the next one. Or the next one, on and on?
I love this. Singer proceeds to tell us why his "super duper" progressive betting system is different. Different from all other progressive betting systems. And then proceeds to lay out a very typical betting progression system.

There is nothing new here, Singer. NOTHING! And it has been proven, many, many times, by people much, much smarter than both you and I that this doesn't work, longterm. No betting system can overcome negative expectation. No betting system can overcome a house edge.

And adding a stop limit to the mix, which also as been thoroughly proven to do absolutely nothing, is NOT the magical bullet that suddenly changes anything. Nothing new here Singer....It's all voodoo and has been mathematically proven so time and time again.

About the only thing I am not sure of is who you are lying to here, the gullible players that believe your nonsense or yourself? I mean, I KNOW you didn't make 900k, or 1.5 Million profit or whatever number you are using now. I know it! You know it! I think almost everyone has figured THAT out. But maybe you really think that it is possible in which case you are lying to yourself rather than intentionally lying to everyone else. But even if you truly believe this, it is just not fair to wrap this false believe up in these completely phony claims that have been proven is mathematically impossible.


Nothing freaking new here Singer... Nothing special about what you are claiming. It has all been claimed before and proven mathematically impossible. You are like a caveman saying "yeah but my square wheel is better than the other square wheels that don't work...mine is different". And then you proceed to unveil the exact same square wheel that has been proven not to work.