Originally Posted by smurgerburger View Post
Originally Posted by quahaug View Post
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

Alan pointed out on twitter that Rob's double up sequence has not been verified. But no one has disputed it either. That is true either way. But so far he's the only one that has put up what he says is the actual sequence of events to get to the big jackpot. What I have done is contacted the author of the Wired article, Kevin Paulson, and made him aware of Rob's claim plus also giving him the link to Rob's explanation of it on Alan's site. Let's see what he has to say about it.

I've also put the story up on twitter and it's getting activity. The more the story spreads, the more people know about it, the bigger the chance, if there is any, of someone coming forward and saying they taught Rob the strategy. I'll be getting around to posting up the 1K reward on twitter. Right now I'm busier than shit between vulturing, genealogy and dealing with this story so everything is not going to get done all at once. But I'm doing my part to spread the story.
So the bottom line is it's the correct sequence because Singer say's it's the correct sequence.....Uh.... OK, I guess.

I find Rob's version of the DU bug very believable and I believe Axel has verified that it's correct.

I think if you read his description with an open mind you'll conclude it's either correct (though he still may have learned it from a third party), or it's a very ingenious invention. Was it even publicly known that the WIRED story was inaccurate? If not, why wouldn't Rob just repeat the version from the story?
I HAVE NEVER PLAYED THIS GLITCH MYSELF!!!! There was more than one article about this and one had a detailed explanation of the steps it took to exploit the bug. I was told by someone that has knowledge about this(they didnt play them they know how to fix them) the article was correct.

I havent found anything online explaining the bill validator thing and how and why all that has an affect. When im not lazy I will look it up, but as I said before I have no doubt KJ and some others have been frantically searching online.

When I talked to Rob on the phone he seemed to be sincere. His story flowed in a natural manor. Perhaps Rob is a master at deception, I havent talked to him or know him well enough to know. I think I would want more evidence either way before I was willing take a side on the yes or no.

Rob, Mike does a youtube live stream now and he posts them on WOV. If he were to offer to interview you live regarding this, would you be willing to? I would defiantly try my best to convince him this would be an interesting show. Not that I would be able to move the needle on his decision but i can at least bring it up and I know lots of people will watch and it would be interesting. He might have an issue with the fact that he banned you and his normal policy is that once banned he doesn't want to hear from those members. Also, you have said a lot of nasty stuff about him and from anything I have ever heard he never disparaged you and actually said good things about how you were and acted in person.