Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
I didn’t lead you down any path with the hopes of twisting anything you said to appear unethical or illegal. The actual facts of your above post speak for itself, and makes my observations even clearer.

The facts of the laws in this country and states (which I’m sure you are a citizen of) remain the laws. Using the word circumventing the law through a bunch of undetectable maneuvers doesn’t mean you get to twist them so they fit your narrative to make what you’re doing legal.

In your own words “I certainly might be circumventing their terms and conditions. (there’s that word again) I make no apologies for that, especially since many of them fail to pay, delay and screw players outright. Even the ones that don't do that oftentimes try to use technicalities in order to void winnings. It's a very deceptive industry that preys on people”

What your saying here sounds to me like you’re saying, since many of them are crooks robbing millions and millions of dollars every year from USA idiots dumb enough to get involved with them in the first place, and who have absolutely no legal place to contact and help recover the monies they stole: makes it okay for you to break banking laws in the USA using cryto, launder, or whatever means you use, along with deceiving the online casinos just fine. It’s all okay as long as you get paid. Please don’t mention Sad-Shack-Mike as any type or form of any regulator source. If the DOJ ever seizes your banking funds, you’ll never see or hear from him again.

I’m certain most AP’s hustling land casinos with promos, using other people’s cards, convincing seniors to move to another machine so you could vulture that one, just to name a few and I mean just a few maneuvers is all okay with you. Doing this nonsense your whole life makes it hard for any of you to see it as any type of hustling. After all AP’s need a job also. Your post above confirms how you view your AP actions and your tunnel vision.

You could circumvent my opinion any way you like if it makes you feel better.

I stand by my opinion of a hustling con and rest my case.

Oh, and for the record I couldn’t care less if Nathan was your sock. I love the back and forth banter and pointing out my opinion. I don’t care if any discussion I’m having involves the same person but a different name, does it really matter? After all what good is a forum without discussion?

Thanks for the reply.
So, when you were questioning me as to why I was using multiple different machines, VPN's and whatnot, you thought I might possibly be using that stuff to anonymously give to charity and save lives?
Of course, you knew where it was headed. You try to b******* me all you want, there's plenty of stuff I don't know understand, and there's hey s*** ton of people smarter than be but I but be careful to underestimate me.



And there you go twisting s*** again, I never said I was doing anything to the circumvent the law. I don't use a Bitcoin to circumvent anything, I use it as a tool, it's basically the only cost effective fast option they give me, some places only allow crypto. My crypto account is attached to my name and verified by my ID. The only thing I'm circumventing is the terms and services of an offshore private business. It no different than breaking Dan's no sockpuppet rule. It might be illegal for a grocery store to sell you something past its expiration date it doesn't make it illegal for you to buy it.

You claim what I am doing is illegal, please show us proof of this. Maybe you can go make some citizen's arrest considering the fact that there are millions of people doing it. I thought you mentioned that you played poker online or something previously(perhaps it was someone else)? There's a good chance have a family member or friend that plays online. I know you hate the fact that I figured out how to Go the extra steps and profit from it.

Perhaps you missed it, but I rarely vulture machines. I've made posts before chastising people who do anything to f*** with the customers that's included people trying to do things to get customers off the machines. I've pointed out creators to security. I think all that stuff is deplorable. You want to lump everyone in together since it fits your narrative. That's like saying all lawyers are unethical pieces of s***.

It's good to see you're no longer stating your opinions as facts. You know what they say about opinions don't you?