Originally Posted by redietz View Post
Current assumptions are that a good chunk, possibly more than half of transmission of the virus occurs from asymptomatic people. This would mean that the thermal cameras, while useful in that they might reduce infected individuals on property by half, would of course fail to detect the other half who are asymptomatic. While catching half of those who are contagious is useful, what does cutting number of infected on property by half really mean?

It's a nice loud public relations move, certainly. It makes properties safer, but it surely doesn't make them safe. It does eliminate the obvious hacking, coughing seriously ill, so that may help Wynn customers relax a bit. Relaxation, however, doesn't solve the core problem. The virus hides in asymptomatic people.
So what's the answer? Is there anything we can reasonably do to knock this out permanently?