Alan (Andrew) is 100% correct in this situation. And you won't read where I have written that very often.

This isn't that difficult. Rob Singer has made a rather extraordinary claim, that he discovered and played the double up bug to the tune of 2.8 million dollars, for 5 years before Nester and Kane got busted. Again, this is an extraordinary claim. It would be one of the biggest stories in the AP/Gambling community EVER. And Rob would be a rockstar and deservedly so.

But a claim of this magnitude requires a little something more than just a persons say so. Especially a person with questionable credibility and I am being nice with that description. To date Rob has resisted providing any kind of supporting evidence. No evidence but plenty of excuses why he can't.

Alan (Andrew) has come up with a simple and fair solution, one that Rob should have no excuse for. Show documentation for the purchase of the 1.5 million RV that Singer has stated a number of times was purchased with the winnings from the double-up bug. There is no excuse for not being able to provide this. Now Rob rightfully says this doesn't prove that the money to purchase the RV came from the double up. It could have come from a lifetime of saving. Rob is correct. BUT it supports the claim, if the timing is correct. That is what supporting evidence is. In a sense we are lowing the bar and saying we are willing to accept this as proof.

There is absolutely no excuse why Rob should reject this offer. If he does so, it closes the case for me. I mean, honestly the case is already closed for me, but I am trying as hard as I can to have an open mind and fairly give Rob a chance to prove his extraordinary claim and change my mind.

Now likely Rob will respond with a nasty name calling post directed at me. And Rob's supporters and enablers like Mickeycrimm and coach belly will demand that I prove this or that. That is all fluff and misdirection. This is an entirely different level. Rob's claim is extraordinary. It would be the biggest story in the AP/gambling community. It requires special verification. Otherwise, Rob might just as well be saying he has his own space rocket and a summer compound on the dark side of the moon that he visits regularly.

Balls in your court Rob. And I know you are moving ahead with the Wizard interview part of this and that is great. But there is no way Wizard accepts this claim without some sort of supporting documentation. Alan has made it simple. He has lowered the bar for proof as low as it can be. Time to put up or shut up.