Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
If this interview is anything like the first one he did with you, it's going to be pointless and get nowhere. I made a few suggestions to Mike, however, if he's setting it up within a week, I highly doubt my suggestions will take place. Rob, I asked that sometime in the future you reserve another interview that I'm involved with personally. A simple Q&A of you telling your story is not going to get to the bottom of this whatsoever. There needs to be much more.
Can I ask what exactly is the purpose of this? Is Mike trying or intending to get to the bottom of this? And what exactly are we talking about getting to the bottom of? All Rob's claims? I mean the thread Alan started over there (at WoV) was about Rob's Progression wagering system with special plays. THAT is what Alan claims Rob told him was BS. Now over here discussion sort of evolved back to the double up bug claim. And while they are separate claims and there are some distinct differences, like the double-up is mathematically possible, so it clears that hurdle whereas the Singer system claim does not, I really consider them both just different parts of fantasy claims. So what exactly are Mike and Rob going to be discussing and trying to get to the bottom of?